When building this driver as a module, we get a helpful warning
about the return type:
drivers/cpufreq/integrator-cpufreq.c:232:2: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
.remove = __exit_p(integrator_cpufreq_remove),
If the remove callback returns void, the caller gets an undefined
value as it expects an integer to be returned. This fixes the
problem by passing down the value from cpufreq_unregister_driver.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Several years ago there was an effort to convert all uses of
set_cpus_allowed to use set_cpus_allowed_ptr with the goal of eventually
removing the current definition of set_cpus_allowed and renaming
set_cpus_allowed_ptr as set_cpus_allowed
(https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/26/59). This is another step in this
direction.
The Coccinelle semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
// <smpl>
@@
expression E1,E2;
@@
- set_cpus_allowed(E1, cpumask_of_cpu(E2))
+ set_cpus_allowed_ptr(E1, cpumask_of(E2))
@@
expression E;
identifier I;
@@
- set_cpus_allowed(E, I)
+ set_cpus_allowed_ptr(E, &I)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Himangi Saraogi <himangi774@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
CPUFreq core has new infrastructure that would guarantee serialized calls to
target() or target_index() callbacks. These are called
cpufreq_freq_transition_begin() and cpufreq_freq_transition_end().
This patch converts existing drivers to use these new set of routines.
Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Sometimes boot loaders set CPU frequency to a value outside of frequency table
present with cpufreq core. In such cases CPU might be unstable if it has to run
on that frequency for long duration of time and so its better to set it to a
frequency which is specified in frequency table.
On some systems we can't really say what frequency we're running at the moment
and so for these we shouldn't check if we are running at a frequency present in
frequency table. And so we really can't force this for all the cpufreq drivers.
Hence we are created another flag here: CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK that
will be marked by platforms which want to go for this check at boot time.
Initially this is done for all ARM platforms but others may follow if required.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This makes the Integrator cpufreq driver probe from the core
module device tree node through it's registered platforms
device, getting the memory base from the device tree,
remapping it and removing dependencies to <mach/platform.h>
and <mach/hardware.h> by moving the two affected CM
register offsets into the driver.
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.
Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init(). And so we don't need to set policy->cur from driver anymore.
Over that it sets policy->min and max correctly. They were earlier set to
current frequency of CPU but they should be set to max and min freq of cpu.
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Most of the users of cpufreq_verify_within_limits() calls it for
limiting with min/max from policy->cpuinfo. We can make that code
simple by introducing another routine which will do this for them
automatically.
This patch adds another routine cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits()
and updates others to use it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>