There used to be time when ->d_revalidate() couldn't return an error.
So intents code had lookup_instantiate_filp() stash ERR_PTR(error)
in nd->intent.open.filp and had it checked after lookup_hash(), to
catch the otherwise silent failures. That had been introduced by
commit 4af4c52f34. These days
->d_revalidate() can and does propagate errors back to callers
explicitly, so this check isn't needed anymore.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
We have a bunch of diverging codepaths in do_last(); some of
them converge, but the case of having to create a new file
duplicates large part of common tail of the rest and exits
separately. Massage them so that they could be merged.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Lift it to lookup_one_len() and link_path_walk() resp. into the
same place where we calculated default hash function of the same
name.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Instead of path_lookupat() doing trailing symlink resolution,
use the same scheme as on the O_CREAT side. Walk with
LOOKUP_PARENT, then (in do_last()) look the final component
up, then either open it or return error or, if it's a symlink,
give the symlink back to path_openat() to be resolved there.
The really messy complication here is RCU. We don't want to drop
out of RCU mode before the final lookup, since we don't want to
bounce parent directory ->d_count without a good reason.
Result is _not_ pretty; later in the series we'll clean it up.
For now we are roughly back where we'd been before the revert
done by Nick's series - top-level logics of path_openat() is
cleaned up, do_last() does actual opening, symlink resolution is
done uniformly.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Don't stash the struct file * used as starting point of walk in nameidata;
pass file ** to path_init() instead.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
New helper: terminate_walk(). An error has happened during pathname
resolution and we either drop nd->path or terminate RCU, depending
the mode we had been in. After that, nd is essentially empty.
Switch link_path_walk() to using that for cleanup.
Now the top-level logics in link_path_walk() is back to sanity. RCU
dependencies are in the lower-level functions.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Now we have do_follow_link() guaranteed to leave without dangling RCU
and the next step will get LOOKUP_RCU logics completely out of
link_path_walk().
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
new helper: path_openat(). Does what do_filp_open() does, except
that it tries only the walk mode (RCU/normal/force revalidation)
it had been told to.
Both create and non-create branches are using path_lookupat() now.
Fixed the double audit_inode() in non-create branch.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
take calculation of open_flags by open(2) arguments into new helper
in fs/open.c, move filp_open() over there, have it and do_sys_open()
use that helper, switch exec.c callers of do_filp_open() to explicit
(and constant) struct open_flags.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
No point messing with passing shitloads of "operation mode" arguments
to do_open() one by one, especially since they are not going to change
during do_filp_open(). Collect them into a struct, fill it and pass
to do_last() by reference.
Make sure that lookup intent flags are correctly set and removed - we
want them for do_last(), but they make no sense for __do_follow_link().
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
instead of ad-hackery around need_reval_dot(), do the following:
set a flag (LOOKUP_JUMPED) in the beginning of path, on absolute
symlink traversal, on ".." and on procfs-style symlinks. Clear on
normal components, leave unchanged on ".". Non-nested callers of
link_path_walk() call handle_reval_path(), which checks that flag
is set and that fs does want the final revalidate thing, then does
->d_revalidate(). In link_path_walk() all the return_reval stuff
is gone.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Actual dependency on whether we want RCU or not is in 3 small areas
(as it ought to be) and everything around those is the same in both
versions. Since each function has only one caller and those callers
are on two sides of if (flags & LOOKUP_RCU), it's easier and cleaner
to merge them and pull the checks inside.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Al Viro