Commit Graph

58 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Filipe Manana 0870295b23 Btrfs: collect only the necessary ordered extents on ranged fsync
Instead of collecting all ordered extents from the inode's ordered tree
and then wait for all of them to complete, just collect the ones that
overlap the fsync range.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-11-21 11:59:56 -08:00
Josef Bacik 50d9aa99bd Btrfs: make sure logged extents complete in the current transaction V3
Liu Bo pointed out that my previous fix would lose the generation update in the
scenario I described.  It is actually much worse than that, we could lose the
entire extent if we lose power right after the transaction commits.  Consider
the following

write extent 0-4k
log extent in log tree
commit transaction
	< power fail happens here
ordered extent completes

We would lose the 0-4k extent because it hasn't updated the actual fs tree, and
the transaction commit will reset the log so it isn't replayed.  If we lose
power before the transaction commit we are save, otherwise we are not.

Fix this by keeping track of all extents we logged in this transaction.  Then
when we go to commit the transaction make sure we wait for all of those ordered
extents to complete before proceeding.  This will make sure that if we lose
power after the transaction commit we still have our data.  This also fixes the
problem of the improperly updated extent generation.  Thanks,

cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-11-21 11:58:32 -08:00
Chris Mason 8d875f95da btrfs: disable strict file flushes for renames and truncates
Truncates and renames are often used to replace old versions of a file
with new versions.  Applications often expect this to be an atomic
replacement, even if they haven't done anything to make sure the new
version is fully on disk.

Btrfs has strict flushing in place to make sure that renaming over an
old file with a new file will fully flush out the new file before
allowing the transaction commit with the rename to complete.

This ordering means the commit code needs to be able to lock file pages,
and there are a few paths in the filesystem where we will try to end a
transaction with the page lock held.  It's rare, but these things can
deadlock.

This patch removes the ordered flushes and switches to a best effort
filemap_flush like ext4 uses. It's not perfect, but it should fix the
deadlocks.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-08-15 07:43:42 -07:00
Qu Wenruo d458b0540e btrfs: Cleanup the "_struct" suffix in btrfs_workequeue
Since the "_struct" suffix is mainly used for distinguish the differnt
btrfs_work between the original and the newly created one,
there is no need using the suffix since all btrfs_workers are changed
into btrfs_workqueue.

Also this patch fixed some codes whose code style is changed due to the
too long "_struct" suffix.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:17:16 -04:00
Qu Wenruo fccb5d86d8 btrfs: Replace fs_info->endio_* workqueue with btrfs_workqueue.
Replace the fs_info->endio_* workqueues with the newly created
btrfs_workqueue.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:17:08 -04:00
Qu Wenruo a44903abe9 btrfs: Replace fs_info->flush_workers with btrfs_workqueue.
Replace the fs_info->submit_workers with the newly created
btrfs_workqueue.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:17:07 -04:00
Miao Xie 827463c49f Btrfs: don't mix the ordered extents of all files together during logging the inodes
There was a problem in the old code:
If we failed to log the csum, we would free all the ordered extents in the log list
including those ordered extents that were logged successfully, it would make the
log committer not to wait for the completion of the ordered extents.

This patch doesn't insert the ordered extents that is about to be logged into
a global list, instead, we insert them into a local list. If we log the ordered
extents successfully, we splice them with the global list, or we will throw them
away, then do full sync. It can also reduce the lock contention and the traverse
time of list.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:15:36 -04:00
Miao Xie b02441999e Btrfs: don't wait for the completion of all the ordered extents
It is very likely that there are lots of ordered extents in the filesytem,
if we wait for the completion of all of them when we want to reclaim some
space for the metadata space reservation, we would be blocked for a long
time. The performance would drop down suddenly for a long time.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-11 22:13:44 -05:00
Josef Bacik 0ef8b72607 Btrfs: return an error from btrfs_wait_ordered_range
I noticed that if the free space cache has an error writing out it's data it
won't actually error out, it will just carry on.  This is because it doesn't
check the return value of btrfs_wait_ordered_range, which didn't actually return
anything.  So fix this in order to keep us from making free space cache look
valid when it really isnt.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-11 22:07:35 -05:00
Josef Bacik f0de181c9b Btrfs: kill delay_iput arg to the wait_ordered functions
This is a left over of how we used to wait for ordered extents, which was to
grab the inode and then run filemap flush on it.  However if we have an ordered
extent then we already are holding a ref on the inode, and we just use
btrfs_start_ordered_extent anyway, so there is no reason to have an extra ref on
the inode to start work on the ordered extent.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-21 11:05:27 -04:00
Josef Bacik 77cef2ec54 Btrfs: allow partial ordered extent completion
We currently have this problem where you can truncate pages that have not yet
been written for an ordered extent.  We do this because the truncate will be
coming behind to clean us up anyway so what's the harm right?  Well if truncate
fails for whatever reason we leave an orphan item around for the file to be
cleaned up later.  But if the user goes and truncates up the file and tries to
read from the area that had been discarded previously they will get a csum error
because we never actually wrote that data out.

This patch fixes this by allowing us to either discard the ordered extent
completely, by which I mean we just free up the space we had allocated and not
add the file extent, or adjust the length of the file extent we write.  We do
this by setting the length we truncated down to in the ordered extent, and then
we set the file extent length and ram bytes to this length.  The total disk
space stays unchanged since we may be compressed and we can't just chop off the
disk space, but at least this way the file extent only points to the valid data.
Then when the file extent is free'd the extent and csums will be freed normally.

This patch is needed for the next series which will give us more graceful
recovery of failed truncates.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:34 -04:00
Miao Xie f51a4a1826 Btrfs: remove btrfs_sector_sum structure
Using the structure btrfs_sector_sum to keep the checksum value is
unnecessary, because the extents that btrfs_sector_sum points to are
continuous, we can find out the expected checksums by btrfs_ordered_sum's
bytenr and the offset, so we can remove btrfs_sector_sum's bytenr. After
removing bytenr, there is only one member in the structure, so it makes
no sense to keep the structure, just remove it, and use a u32 array to
store the checksum value.

By this change, we don't use the while loop to get the checksums one by
one. Now, we can get several checksum value at one time, it improved the
performance by ~74% on my SSD (31MB/s -> 54MB/s).

test command:
 # dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/btrfs/file0 bs=1M count=1024 oflag=sync

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-07-02 11:50:47 -04:00
Miao Xie 199c2a9c3d Btrfs: introduce per-subvolume ordered extent list
The reason we introduce per-subvolume ordered extent list is the same
as the per-subvolume delalloc inode list.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-06-14 11:29:41 -04:00
Miao Xie e4100d987b Btrfs: improve the performance of the csums lookup
It is very likely that there are several blocks in bio, it is very
inefficient if we get their csums one by one. This patch improves
this problem by getting the csums in batch.

According to the result of the following test, the execute time of
__btrfs_lookup_bio_sums() is down by ~28%(300us -> 217us).

 # dd if=<mnt>/file of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1024

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-05-06 15:54:35 -04:00
Chris Mason b2c6b3e061 Merge branch 'master' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-next into for-linus-3.9
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Conflicts:
	fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
2013-02-20 14:05:45 -05:00
Josef Bacik 569e0f358c Btrfs: place ordered operations on a per transaction list
Miao made the ordered operations stuff run async, which introduced a
deadlock where we could get somebody (sync) racing in and committing the
transaction while a commit was already happening.  The new committer would
try and flush ordered operations which would hang waiting for the commit to
finish because it is done asynchronously and no longer inherits the callers
trans handle.  To fix this we need to make the ordered operations list a per
transaction list.  We can get new inodes added to the ordered operation list
by truncating them and then having another process writing to them, so this
makes it so that anybody trying to add an ordered operation _must_ start a
transaction in order to add itself to the list, which will keep new inodes
from getting added to the ordered operations list after we start committing.
This should fix the deadlock and also keeps us from doing a lot more work
than we need to during commit.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-02-20 12:59:57 -05:00
Josef Bacik 2ab28f322f Btrfs: wait on ordered extents at the last possible moment
Since we don't actually copy the extent information from the source tree in
the fast case we don't need to wait for ordered io to be completed in order
to fsync, we just need to wait for the io to be completed.  So when we're
logging our file just attach all of the ordered extents to the log, and then
when the log syncs just wait for IO_DONE on the ordered extents and then
write the super.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-02-20 09:37:04 -05:00
Linus Torvalds a22180d266 Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs
Pull btrfs update from Chris Mason:
 "A big set of fixes and features.

  In terms of line count, most of the code comes from Stefan, who added
  the ability to replace a single drive in place.  This is different
  from how btrfs normally replaces drives, and is much much much faster.

  Josef is plowing through our synchronous write performance.  This pull
  request does not include the DIO_OWN_WAITING patch that was discussed
  on the list, but it has a number of other improvements to cut down our
  latencies and CPU time during fsync/O_DIRECT writes.

  Miao Xie has a big series of fixes and is spreading out ordered
  operations over more CPUs.  This improves performance and reduces
  contention.

  I've put in fixes for error handling around hash collisions.  These
  are going back to individual stable kernels as I test against them.

  Otherwise we have a lot of fixes and cleanups, thanks everyone!
  raid5/6 is being rebased against the device replacement code.  I'll
  have it posted this Friday along with a nice series of benchmarks."

* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs: (115 commits)
  Btrfs: fix a bug of per-file nocow
  Btrfs: fix hash overflow handling
  Btrfs: don't take inode delalloc mutex if we're a free space inode
  Btrfs: fix autodefrag and umount lockup
  Btrfs: fix permissions of empty files not affected by umask
  Btrfs: put raid properties into global table
  Btrfs: fix BUG() in scrub when first superblock reading gives EIO
  Btrfs: do not call file_update_time in aio_write
  Btrfs: only unlock and relock if we have to
  Btrfs: use tokens where we can in the tree log
  Btrfs: optimize leaf_space_used
  Btrfs: don't memset new tokens
  Btrfs: only clear dirty on the buffer if it is marked as dirty
  Btrfs: move checks in set_page_dirty under DEBUG
  Btrfs: log changed inodes based on the extent map tree
  Btrfs: add path->really_keep_locks
  Btrfs: do not mark ems as prealloc if we are writing to them
  Btrfs: keep track of the extents original block length
  Btrfs: inline csums if we're fsyncing
  Btrfs: don't bother copying if we're only logging the inode
  ...
2012-12-18 09:42:05 -08:00
Miao Xie 9afab8820b Btrfs: make ordered extent be flushed by multi-task
Though the process of the ordered extents is a bit different with the delalloc inode
flush, but we can see it as a subset of the delalloc inode flush, so we also handle
them by flush workers.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-11 13:31:38 -05:00
Miao Xie 25287e0a16 Btrfs: make ordered operations be handled by multi-task
The process of the ordered operations is similar to the delalloc inode flush, so
we handle them by flush workers.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-11 13:31:37 -05:00
Adam Buchbinder 48fc7f7e78 Fix misspellings of "whether" in comments.
"Whether" is misspelled in various comments across the tree; this
fixes them. No code changes.

Signed-off-by: Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2012-11-19 14:31:35 +01:00
Liu Bo 6bbe3a9c80 Btrfs: kill obsolete arguments in btrfs_wait_ordered_extents
nocow_only is now an obsolete argument.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
2012-10-04 09:39:57 -04:00
Miao Xie 6352b91da1 Btrfs: use a slab for ordered extents allocation
The ordered extent allocation is in the fast path of the IO, so use a slab
to improve the speed of the allocation.

 "Size of the struct is 280, so this will fall into the size-512 bucket,
  giving 8 objects per page, while own slab will pack 14 objects into a page.

  Another benefit I see is to check for leaked objects when the module is
  removed (and the cache destroy takes place)."
						-- David Sterba

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
2012-10-01 15:19:11 -04:00
Miao Xie b9a8cc5bef Btrfs: fix file extent discount problem in the, snapshot
If a snapshot is created while we are writing some data into the file,
the i_size of the corresponding file in the snapshot will be wrong, it will
be beyond the end of the last file extent. And btrfsck will report:
  root 256 inode 257 errors 100

Steps to reproduce:
 # mkfs.btrfs <partition>
 # mount <partition> <mnt>
 # cd <mnt>
 # dd if=/dev/zero of=tmpfile bs=4M count=1024 &
 # for ((i=0; i<4; i++))
 > do
 > btrfs sub snap . $i
 > done

This because the algorithm of disk_i_size update is wrong. Though there are
some ordered extents behind the current one which we use to update disk_i_size,
it doesn't mean those extents will be dealt with in the same transaction. So
We shouldn't use the offset of those extents to update disk_i_size. Or we will
get the wrong i_size in the snapshot.

We fix this problem by recording the max real i_size. If we find there is a
ordered extent which is in front of the current one and doesn't complete, we
will record the end of the current one into that ordered extent. Surely, if
the current extent holds the end of other extent(it must be greater than
the current one because it is behind the current one), we will record the
number that the current extent holds. In this way, we can exclude the ordered
extents that may not be dealth with in the same transaction, and be easy to
know the real disk_i_size.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
2012-10-01 15:19:10 -04:00
Josef Bacik 5fd0204355 Btrfs: finish ordered extents in their own thread
We noticed that the ordered extent completion doesn't really rely on having
a page and that it could be done independantly of ending the writeback on a
page.  This patch makes us not do the threaded endio stuff for normal
buffered writes and direct writes so we can end page writeback as soon as
possible (in irq context) and only start threads to do the ordered work when
it is actually done.  Compression needs to be reworked some to take
advantage of this as well, but atm it has to do a find_get_page in its endio
handler so it must be done in its own thread.  This makes direct writes
quite a bit faster.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2012-05-30 10:23:33 -04:00