On some old IBM workstations and desktop computers, the BIOS presents in the
DSDT an SMBus object that is missing the HID identifier that the i2c-scmi
driver looks for. Modify the ACPI device scan code to insert the missing HID
if it finds an IBM system with such an object.
Affected machines: IntelliStation Z20/Z30. Note that the i2c-i801 driver no
longer works on these machines because of ACPI resource conflicts.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Although the majority of PCI devices can generate PMEs that in
principle may be used to wake up devices suspended at run time,
platform support is generally necessary to convert PMEs into wake-up
events that can be delivered to the kernel. If ACPI is used for this
purpose, PME signals generated by a PCI device will trigger the ACPI
GPE associated with the device to generate an ACPI wake-up event that
we can set up a handler for, provided that everything is configured
correctly.
Unfortunately, the subset of PCI devices that have GPEs associated
with them is quite limited. The devices without dedicated GPEs have
to rely on the GPEs associated with other devices (in the majority of
cases their upstream bridges and, possibly, the root bridge) to
generate ACPI wake-up events in response to PME signals from them.
Add ACPI platform support for PCI PME wake-up:
o Add a framework making is possible to use ACPI system notify
handlers for run-time PM.
o Add new PCI platform callback ->run_wake() to struct
pci_platform_pm_ops allowing us to enable/disable the platform to
generate wake-up events for given device. Implemet this callback
for the ACPI platform.
o Define ACPI wake-up handlers for PCI devices and PCI root buses and
make the PCI-ACPI binding code register wake-up notifiers for all
PCI devices present in the ACPI tables.
o Add function pci_dev_run_wake() which can be used by PCI drivers to
check if given device is capable of generating wake-up events at
run time.
Developed in cooperation with Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Use the run_wake flag to mark all devices for which run-time wake-up
events may be generated by the platform. Introduce a new wake-up
flag, always_enabled, for marking devices that should be permanently
enabled to generate run-time events. Also, introduce a reference
counter for run-wake devices and a function that will initialize all
of the run-time wake-up fields for given device.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Callers (acpi_memhotplug.c, dock.c and others) check for the return
value of acpi_bus_add() and assume a valid device was returned in
case zero was returned.
Thus return -ENODEV if no device was found in acpi_bus_scan and
propagate this through acpi_bus_add and acpi_bus_start.
Also remove a confusing comment in acpiphp_glue.c, acpi_bus_scan
will and cannot invoke if acpi_bus_add returns no valid device.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
If acpi_bus_add does not return a device and it's passed
to acpi_bus_start, bad things will happen:
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008
IP: [<ffffffff8128402d>] acpi_bus_start+0x14/0x24
...
[<ffffffffa008977a>] acpiphp_bus_add+0xba/0x130 [acpiphp]
[<ffffffffa008aa72>] enable_device+0x132/0x2ff [acpiphp]
[<ffffffffa0089b68>] acpiphp_enable_slot+0xb8/0x130 [acpiphp]
[<ffffffffa0089df7>] handle_hotplug_event_func+0x87/0x190 [acpiphp]
Next patch would make this NULL pointer check obsolete, but
better having one more than one missing...
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
CC: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Minor code cleanup, no functional change. Instead of remembering
what HIDs & CIDs to add later, just add them immediately.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Every acpi_device has at least one ID (if there's no _HID or _CID, we
give it a synthetic or default ID). So there's no longer a need to
check whether an ID exists; we can just use it.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
We now keep a single list of IDs that includes both the _HID and any
_CIDs. We no longer need to keep track of whether the device has a _CID.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
There's no need to treat _HID and _CID differently. Keeping them in
a single list makes code that uses the IDs a little simpler because it
can just traverse the list rather than checking "do we have a HID?",
"do we have any CIDs?"
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This makes sure every acpi_device has at least one ID. If we build an
acpi_device for a namespace node with no _HID or _CID, we sometimes
synthesize an ID like "LNXCPU" or "LNXVIDEO". If we don't even have
that, give it a default "device" ID.
Note that this means things like:
/sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/HWP0001:00/HWP0002:04/device:00
(a PCI slot SxFy device) will have "hid" and "modprobe" entries, where
they didn't before. These aren't very useful (a HID of "device" doesn't
tell you what *kind* of device it is, so it doesn't help find a driver),
but I don't think they're harmful.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Use acpi_device_hid() rather than accessing acpi_device.pnp.hardware_id
directly.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This makes \_SB_ show up as /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00
rather than "device:00". This has been broken for a loooong time
(at least since 2.6.13) because device->parent is an acpi_device
pointer, not a handle.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
acpi_bus_scan() traverses the namespace to enumerate devices and uses
acpi_add_single_object() to create acpi_devices. When the platform
notifies us of a hot-plug event, we need to traverse part of the namespace
again to figure out what appeared or disappeared. (We don't yet call
acpi_bus_scan() during hot-plug, but I plan to do that in the future.)
This patch makes acpi_add_single_object() notice when we already have
an acpi_device, so we don't need to make a new one.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This patch adds acpi_bus_type_and_status(), which determines the type
of the object and whether we want to build an acpi_device for it. If
it is acpi_device-worthy, it returns the type and the device's current
status.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
acpi_bus_scan() currently walks the namespace manually. This patch changes
it to use acpi_walk_namespace() instead.
Besides removing some complicated code, this means we take advantage of the
namespace locking done by acpi_walk_namespace(). The locking isn't so
important at boot-time, but I hope to eventually use this same path to
handle hot-addition of devices, when it will be important.
Note that acpi_walk_namespace() does not actually visit the starting node
first, so we need to do that by hand first.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
We can identify the root of the ACPI device tree by the fact that it
has no parent. This is simpler than passing around ACPI_BUS_TYPE_SYSTEM
and will help remove special treatment of the device tree root.
Currently, we add the root by hand with ACPI_BUS_TYPE_SYSTEM. If we
traverse the tree treating the root as just another device and use
acpi_get_type(), the root shows up as ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This patch changes the order so we enumerate in the "root, namespace,
functional fixed" order instead of the "root, functional fixed, namespace"
order. When I change acpi_bus_scan() to use acpi_walk_namespace(), it
will use the former order, so this patch isolates the order change for
bisectability.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This patch changes acpi_bus_scan() to take an acpi_handle rather than an
acpi_device pointer. I plan to use acpi_bus_scan() in the hotplug path,
and I'd rather not assume that notifications only go to nodes that already
have acpi_devices.
This will also help remove the special case for adding the root node. We
currently add the root by hand before acpi_bus_scan(), but using a handle
here means we can start the acpi_bus_scan() directly with the root even
though it doesn't have an acpi_device yet.
Note that acpi_bus_scan() currently adds and/or starts the *children* of
its device argument. It doesn't do anything with the device itself.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This patch adds acpi_bus_get_parent(), which ascends the namespace until
it finds a parent with an acpi_device.
Then we use acpi_bus_get_parent() in acpi_add_single_object(), so callers
don't have to figure out or keep track of the parent acpi_device.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
acpi_add_single_object() is static, and all callers supply a valid "child"
argument, so we don't need to check it. This patch also remove some
unnecessary initializations.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
We now save the ACPI bus "device_type" in the acpi_device structure, so
we don't need to pass it around explicitly anymore.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
We only pass the "type" to acpi_device_set_context() so we know whether
the device has a handle to which we can attach the acpi_device pointer.
But it's safer to just check for the handle directly, since it's in the
acpi_device already.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>