Due to the missing variants there are messages that lack the information
printed by btrfs_info etc helpers.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
btrfs_error() and btrfs_std_error() does the same thing
and calls _btrfs_std_error(), so consolidate them together.
And the main motivation is that btrfs_error() is closely
named with btrfs_err(), one handles error action the other
is to log the error, so don't closely name them.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Suggested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The code using 'ordered_extent_flush_mutex' mutex has removed by below
commit.
- 8d875f95da
btrfs: disable strict file flushes for renames and truncates
But the mutex still lives in struct 'btrfs_fs_info'.
So, this patch removes the mutex from struct 'btrfs_fs_info' and its
initialization code.
Signed-off-by: Byongho Lee <bhlee.kernel@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
These arguments are not used in functions, remove them for cleanup
and make kernel stack happy.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
More than one code call set_block_group_ro() and restore rw in fail.
Old code use bool bit to save blockgroup's ro state, it can not
support parallel case(it is confirmd exist in my debug log).
This patch use ref count to store ro state, and rename
set_block_group_ro/set_block_group_rw
to
inc_block_group_ro/dec_block_group_ro.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
When we clear the dirty bits in btrfs_delete_unused_bgs for extents
in the empty block group, it results in btrfs_finish_extent_commit being
unable to discard the freed extents.
The block group removal patch added an alternate path to forget extents
other than btrfs_finish_extent_commit. As a result, any extents that
would be freed when the block group is removed aren't discarded. In my
test run, with a large copy of mixed sized files followed by removal, it
left nearly 2/3 of extents undiscarded.
To clean up the block groups, we add the removed block group onto a list
that will be discarded after transaction commit.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Tested-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
lockdep report following warning in test:
[25176.843958] =================================
[25176.844519] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
[25176.845047] 4.1.0-rc3 #22 Tainted: G W
[25176.845591] ---------------------------------
[25176.846153] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
[25176.846713] fsstress/26661 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
[25176.847246] (&wr_ctx->wr_lock){+.?...}, at: [<ffffffffa04cdc6d>] scrub_free_ctx+0x2d/0xf0 [btrfs]
[25176.847838] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
[25176.848396] [<ffffffff810bf460>] __lock_acquire+0x6a0/0xe10
[25176.848955] [<ffffffff810bfd1e>] lock_acquire+0xce/0x2c0
[25176.849491] [<ffffffff816489af>] mutex_lock_nested+0x7f/0x410
[25176.850029] [<ffffffffa04d04ff>] scrub_stripe+0x4df/0x1080 [btrfs]
[25176.850575] [<ffffffffa04d11b1>] scrub_chunk.isra.19+0x111/0x130 [btrfs]
[25176.851110] [<ffffffffa04d144c>] scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x27c/0x510 [btrfs]
[25176.851660] [<ffffffffa04d3b87>] btrfs_scrub_dev+0x1c7/0x6c0 [btrfs]
[25176.852189] [<ffffffffa04e918e>] btrfs_dev_replace_start+0x36e/0x450 [btrfs]
[25176.852771] [<ffffffffa04a98e0>] btrfs_ioctl+0x1e10/0x2d20 [btrfs]
[25176.853315] [<ffffffff8121c5b8>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x318/0x570
[25176.853868] [<ffffffff8121c851>] SyS_ioctl+0x41/0x80
[25176.854406] [<ffffffff8164da17>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
[25176.854935] irq event stamp: 51506
[25176.855511] hardirqs last enabled at (51506): [<ffffffff810d4ce5>] vprintk_emit+0x225/0x5e0
[25176.856059] hardirqs last disabled at (51505): [<ffffffff810d4b77>] vprintk_emit+0xb7/0x5e0
[25176.856642] softirqs last enabled at (50886): [<ffffffff81067a23>] __do_softirq+0x363/0x640
[25176.857184] softirqs last disabled at (50949): [<ffffffff8106804d>] irq_exit+0x10d/0x120
[25176.857746]
other info that might help us debug this:
[25176.858845] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[25176.859981] CPU0
[25176.860537] ----
[25176.861059] lock(&wr_ctx->wr_lock);
[25176.861705] <Interrupt>
[25176.862272] lock(&wr_ctx->wr_lock);
[25176.862881]
*** DEADLOCK ***
Reason:
Above warning is caused by:
Interrupt
-> bio_endio()
-> ...
-> scrub_put_ctx()
-> scrub_free_ctx() *1
-> ...
-> mutex_lock(&wr_ctx->wr_lock);
scrub_put_ctx() is allowed to be called in end_bio interrupt, but
in code design, it will never call scrub_free_ctx(sctx) in interrupe
context(above *1), because btrfs_scrub_dev() get one additional
reference of sctx->refs, which makes scrub_free_ctx() only called
withine btrfs_scrub_dev().
Now the code runs out of our wish, because free sequence in
scrub_pending_bio_dec() have a gap.
Current code:
-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------
scrub_pending_bio_dec() | btrfs_scrub_dev
-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------
atomic_dec(&sctx->bios_in_flight); |
wake_up(&sctx->list_wait); |
| scrub_put_ctx()
| -> atomic_dec_and_test(&sctx->refs)
scrub_put_ctx(sctx); |
-> atomic_dec_and_test(&sctx->refs)|
-> scrub_free_ctx() |
-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------
We expected:
-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------
scrub_pending_bio_dec() | btrfs_scrub_dev
-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------
atomic_dec(&sctx->bios_in_flight); |
wake_up(&sctx->list_wait); |
scrub_put_ctx(sctx); |
-> atomic_dec_and_test(&sctx->refs)|
| scrub_put_ctx()
| -> atomic_dec_and_test(&sctx->refs)
| -> scrub_free_ctx()
-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------
Fix:
Move scrub_pending_bio_dec() to a workqueue, to avoid this function run
in interrupt context.
Tested by check tracelog in debug.
Changelog v1->v2:
Use workqueue instead of adjust function call sequence in v1,
because v1 will introduce a bug pointed out by:
Filipe David Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
When allocating a new chunk or removing one we need to update num_devs
device items and insert or remove a chunk item in the chunk tree, so
in the worst case the space needed in the chunk space_info is:
btrfs_calc_trunc_metadata_size(chunk_root, num_devs) +
btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size(chunk_root, 1)
That is, in the worst case we need to cow num_devs paths and cow 1 other
path that can result in splitting every node and leaf, and each path
consisting of BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL - 1 nodes and 1 leaf. We were requiring
some additional chunk_root->nodesize * BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL * num_devs bytes,
which were unnecessary since updating the existing device items does
not result in splitting the nodes and leaf since after updating them
they remain with the same size.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Unlike when attempting to allocate a new block group, where we check
that we have enough space in the system space_info to update the device
items and insert a new chunk item in the chunk tree, we were not checking
if the system space_info had enough space for updating the device items
and deleting the chunk item in the chunk tree. This often lead to -ENOSPC
error when attempting to allocate blocks for the chunk tree (during btree
node/leaf COW operations) while updating the device items or deleting the
chunk item, which resulted in the current transaction being aborted and
turning the filesystem into read-only mode.
While running fstests generic/038, which stresses allocation of block
groups and removal of unused block groups, with a large scratch device
(750Gb) this happened often, despite more than enough unallocated space,
and resulted in the following trace:
[68663.586604] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1521 at fs/btrfs/super.c:260 __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]()
[68663.600407] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28)
(...)
[68663.730829] Call Trace:
[68663.732585] [<ffffffff8142fa46>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b
[68663.734334] [<ffffffff8108b6a2>] ? console_unlock+0x361/0x3ad
[68663.739980] [<ffffffff81045ea5>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[68663.757153] [<ffffffffa036ca6d>] ? __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]
[68663.760925] [<ffffffff81045f05>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
[68663.762854] [<ffffffffa03b159d>] ? btrfs_update_device+0x15a/0x16c [btrfs]
[68663.764073] [<ffffffffa036ca6d>] __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]
[68663.765130] [<ffffffffa03b3638>] btrfs_remove_chunk+0x597/0x5ee [btrfs]
[68663.765998] [<ffffffffa0384663>] ? btrfs_delete_unused_bgs+0x245/0x296 [btrfs]
[68663.767068] [<ffffffffa0384676>] btrfs_delete_unused_bgs+0x258/0x296 [btrfs]
[68663.768227] [<ffffffff8143527f>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2d/0x4c
[68663.769081] [<ffffffffa038b109>] cleaner_kthread+0x13d/0x16c [btrfs]
[68663.799485] [<ffffffffa038afcc>] ? btrfs_alloc_root+0x28/0x28 [btrfs]
[68663.809208] [<ffffffff8105f367>] kthread+0xef/0xf7
[68663.828795] [<ffffffff810e603f>] ? time_hardirqs_on+0x15/0x28
[68663.844942] [<ffffffff8105f278>] ? __kthread_parkme+0xad/0xad
[68663.846486] [<ffffffff81435a88>] ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90
[68663.847760] [<ffffffff8105f278>] ? __kthread_parkme+0xad/0xad
[68663.849503] ---[ end trace 798477c6d6dbaad6 ]---
[68663.850525] BTRFS: error (device sdc) in btrfs_remove_chunk:2652: errno=-28 No space left
So fix this by verifying that enough space exists in system space_info,
and reserving the space in the chunk block reserve, before attempting to
delete the block group and allocate a new system chunk if we don't have
enough space to perform the necessary updates and delete in the chunk
tree. Like for the block group creation case, we don't error our if we
fail to allocate a new system chunk, since we might end up not needing
it (no node/leaf splits happen during the COW operations and/or we end
up not needing to COW any btree nodes or leafs because they were already
COWed in the current transaction and their writeback didn't start yet).
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
While creating a block group, we often end up getting ENOSPC while updating
the chunk tree, which leads to a transaction abortion that produces a trace
like the following:
[30670.116368] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 20735 at fs/btrfs/super.c:260 __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x106 [btrfs]()
[30670.117777] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28)
(...)
[30670.163567] Call Trace:
[30670.163906] [<ffffffff8142fa46>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b
[30670.164522] [<ffffffff8108b6a2>] ? console_unlock+0x361/0x3ad
[30670.165171] [<ffffffff81045ea5>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[30670.166323] [<ffffffffa035daa7>] ? __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x106 [btrfs]
[30670.167213] [<ffffffff81045f05>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
[30670.167862] [<ffffffffa035daa7>] __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x106 [btrfs]
[30670.169116] [<ffffffffa03743d7>] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x101/0x130 [btrfs]
[30670.170593] [<ffffffffa038426a>] __btrfs_end_transaction+0x84/0x366 [btrfs]
[30670.171960] [<ffffffffa038455c>] btrfs_end_transaction+0x10/0x12 [btrfs]
[30670.174649] [<ffffffffa036eb6b>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x11f/0x27c [btrfs]
[30670.176092] [<ffffffffa039450d>] btrfs_fallocate+0x7c8/0xb96 [btrfs]
[30670.177218] [<ffffffff812459f2>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x15
[30670.178622] [<ffffffff81152447>] vfs_fallocate+0x14c/0x1de
[30670.179642] [<ffffffff8116b915>] ? __fget_light+0x2d/0x4f
[30670.180692] [<ffffffff81152863>] SyS_fallocate+0x47/0x62
[30670.186737] [<ffffffff81435b32>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17
[30670.187792] ---[ end trace 0373e6b491c4a8cc ]---
This is because we don't do proper space reservation for the chunk block
reserve when we have multiple tasks allocating chunks in parallel.
So block group creation has 2 phases, and the first phase essentially
checks if there is enough space in the system space_info, allocating a
new system chunk if there isn't, while the second phase updates the
device, extent and chunk trees. However, because the updates to the
chunk tree happen in the second phase, if we have N tasks, each with
its own transaction handle, allocating new chunks in parallel and if
there is only enough space in the system space_info to allocate M chunks,
where M < N, none of the tasks ends up allocating a new system chunk in
the first phase and N - M tasks will get -ENOSPC when attempting to
update the chunk tree in phase 2 if they need to COW any nodes/leafs
from the chunk tree.
Fix this by doing proper reservation in the chunk block reserve.
The issue could be reproduced by running fstests generic/038 in a loop,
which eventually triggered the problem.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Old csum type check is wrong and can't catch csum_type 1(not supported).
Fix it to avoid hostile 0 division.
Reported-by: Lukas Lueg <lukas.lueg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
The annotated functios will be placed into .text.unlikely section. The
annotation also hints compiler to move the code out of the hot paths,
and may implicitly mark if-statement leading to that block as unlikely.
This is a heuristic, the impact on the generated code is not
significant.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
WARN is called from a single location and all bugreports say that's in
super.c __btrfs_abort_transaction. This is slightly confusing as we'd
rather want to know the exact callsite. Whereas this information is
printed in the syslog below the stacktrace, this requires further look
and we usually see only the headline from WARNING.
Moving the WARN into the macro has to inline some code and increases
code by a few kilobytes:
text data bss dec hex filename
835481 20305 14120 869906 d4612 btrfs.ko.before
842883 20305 14120 877308 d62fc btrfs.ko.after
The delta is +7k (130+ calls), measured on 3.19 x86_64, distro config.
The increase is not small and could lead to worse icache use. The code
is on error/exit paths that can be recognized by compiler as cold and
moved out of the way so the impact is speculated to be low, if
measurable at all.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
This patch will provide a framework and help to create attributes
from the structure btrfs_fs_devices which are available even before
fs_info is created. So by moving the parent kobject super_kobj from
fs_info to btrfs_fs_devices, it will help to create attributes
from the btrfs_fs_devices as well.
Patches on top of this patch now will be able to create the
sys/fs/btrfs/fsid kobject and attributes from btrfs_fs_devices
when devices are scanned and registered to the kernel.
Just to note, this does not change any of the existing btrfs sysfs
external kobject names and its attributes and not even the life
cycle of them. Changes are internal only. And to ensure the same,
this path has been tested with various device operations and,
checking and comparing the sysfs kobjects and attributes with
sysfs kobject and attributes with out this patch, and they remain
same.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Btrfs will create qgroup on subvolume creation if quota is enabled, but
qgroup uses the high bits(currently 16 bits) as level, to build the
inheritance.
However it is fully possible a subvolume can be created with a
subvolumeid larger than 1 << BTRFS_QGROUP_LEVEL_SHIFT, so it will be
considered as level 1 and can't be assigned to other qgroup in level 1.
This patch will prevent such things so qgroup inheritance will not be
screwed up.
The downside is very clear, btrfs subvolume number limit will decrease
from (u64 max - 256(fisrt free objectid) - 256(last free objectid)) to
(u48 max -256(first free objectid)).
But we still have near u48(that's 15 digits in dec), so that should not
be a huge problem.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Although we have qgroup level check in btrfs-progs, it's not enough
since other programe may still call ioctl directly not using
btrfs-progs. For example, systemd.
But it's btrfs-progs to be blame since we don't provide a
full-function(like subvolume create things) btrfs library with enough
check, and only rely on kernel ioctl.
So Add level checks in kernel too.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Chris Mason
David Sterba
Anand Jain
Byongho Lee
Zhaolei
Jeff Mahoney
Filipe Manana
Qu Wenruo
David Sterba