This reverts commit 53855d10f4.
It shouldn't have come in yet - it depends on the changes in linux-next
that will come in during the next merge window. As Matthew Wilcox says,
the test suite is broken with the current state without the revert.
Requested-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
When the underflow checks were added to workingset_node_shadow_dec(),
they triggered immediately:
kernel BUG at ./include/linux/swap.h:276!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
Modules linked in: isofs usb_storage fuse xt_CHECKSUM ipt_MASQUERADE nf_nat_masquerade_ipv4 tun nf_conntrack_netbios_ns nf_conntrack_broadcast ip6t_REJECT nf_reject_ipv6
soundcore wmi acpi_als pinctrl_sunrisepoint kfifo_buf tpm_tis industrialio acpi_pad pinctrl_intel tpm_tis_core tpm nfsd auth_rpcgss nfs_acl lockd grace sunrpc dm_crypt
CPU: 0 PID: 20929 Comm: blkid Not tainted 4.8.0-rc8-00087-gbe67d60ba944 #1
Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/Z170-K, BIOS 1803 05/06/2016
task: ffff8faa93ecd940 task.stack: ffff8faa7f478000
RIP: page_cache_tree_insert+0xf1/0x100
Call Trace:
__add_to_page_cache_locked+0x12e/0x270
add_to_page_cache_lru+0x4e/0xe0
mpage_readpages+0x112/0x1d0
blkdev_readpages+0x1d/0x20
__do_page_cache_readahead+0x1ad/0x290
force_page_cache_readahead+0xaa/0x100
page_cache_sync_readahead+0x3f/0x50
generic_file_read_iter+0x5af/0x740
blkdev_read_iter+0x35/0x40
__vfs_read+0xe1/0x130
vfs_read+0x96/0x130
SyS_read+0x55/0xc0
entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x13/0x8f
Code: 03 00 48 8b 5d d8 65 48 33 1c 25 28 00 00 00 44 89 e8 75 19 48 83 c4 18 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 5d c3 0f 0b 41 bd ef ff ff ff eb d7 <0f> 0b e8 88 68 ef ff 0f 1f 84 00
RIP page_cache_tree_insert+0xf1/0x100
This is a long-standing bug in the way shadow entries are accounted in
the radix tree nodes. The shrinker needs to know when radix tree nodes
contain only shadow entries, no pages, so node->count is split in half
to count shadows in the upper bits and pages in the lower bits.
Unfortunately, the radix tree implementation doesn't know of this and
assumes all entries are in node->count. When there is a shadow entry
directly in root->rnode and the tree is later extended, the radix tree
implementation will copy that entry into the new node and and bump its
node->count, i.e. increases the page count bits. Once the shadow gets
removed and we subtract from the upper counter, node->count underflows
and triggers the warning. Afterwards, without node->count reaching 0
again, the radix tree node is leaked.
Limit shadow entries to when we have actual radix tree nodes and can
count them properly. That means we lose the ability to detect refaults
from files that had only the first page faulted in at eviction time.
Fixes: 449dd6984d ("mm: keep page cache radix tree nodes in check")
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reported-and-tested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The fixes to the radix tree test suite show that the multi-order case is
broken. The basic reason is that the radix tree code uses tagged
pointers with the "internal" bit in the low bits, and calculating the
pointer indices was supposed to mask off those bits. But gcc will
notice that we then use the index to re-create the pointer, and will
avoid doing the arithmetic and use the tagged pointer directly.
This cleans the code up, using the existing is_sibling_entry() helper to
validate the sibling pointer range (instead of open-coding it), and
using entry_to_node() to mask off the low tag bit from the pointer. And
once you do that, you might as well just use the now cleaned-up pointer
directly.
[ Side note: the multi-order code isn't actually ever used in the kernel
right now, and the only reason I didn't just delete all that code is
that Kirill Shutemov piped up and said:
"Well, my ext4-with-huge-pages patchset[1] uses multi-order entries.
It also converts shmem-with-huge-pages and hugetlb to them.
I'm okay with converting it to other mechanism, but I need
something. (I looked into Konstantin's RFC patchset[2]. It looks
okay, but I don't feel myself qualified to review it as I don't
know much about radix-tree internals.)"
[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160915115523.29737-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
[2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/147230727479.9957.1087787722571077339.stgit@zurg ]
Reported-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Cedric Blancher <cedric.blancher@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Radix trees may be used not only for storing page cache pages, so
unconditionally accounting radix tree nodes to the current memory cgroup
is bad: if a radix tree node is used for storing data shared among
different cgroups we risk pinning dead memory cgroups forever.
So let's only account radix tree nodes if it was explicitly requested by
passing __GFP_ACCOUNT to INIT_RADIX_TREE. Currently, we only want to
account page cache entries, so mark mapping->page_tree so.
Fixes: 58e698af4c ("radix-tree: account radix_tree_node to memory cgroup")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1470057188-7864-1-git-send-email-vdavydov@virtuozzo.com
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [4.6+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
In addition to replacing the entry, we also clear all associated tags.
This is really a one-off special for page_cache_tree_delete() which had
far too much detailed knowledge about how the radix tree works.
For efficiency, factor node_tag_clear() out of radix_tree_tag_clear() It
can be used by radix_tree_delete_item() as well as
radix_tree_replace_clear_tags().
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
1. Rename the existing variable 'slot' to 'child'.
2. Introduce a new variable called 'slot' which is the address of the
slot we're dealing with. This lets us simplify the tree insertion,
and removes the recalculation of 'slot' at the end of the function.
3. Using 'slot' in the sibling pointer insertion part makes the code
more readable.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Convert radix_tree_next_chunk to use 'child' instead of 'slot' as the
name of the child node. Also use node_maxindex() where it makes sense.
The 'rnode' variable was unnecessary; it doesn't overlap in usage with
'node', so we can just use 'node' the whole way through the function.
Improve the testcase to start the walk from every index in the carefully
constructed tree, and to accept any index within the range covered by
the entry.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
I had previously decided that tagging a single multiorder entry would
count as tagging 2^order entries for the purposes of 'nr_to_tag'. I now
believe that decision to be a mistake, and it should count as a single
entry. That's more likely to be what callers expect.
When walking back up the tree from a newly-tagged entry, the current
code assumed we were starting from the lowest level of the tree; if we
have a multiorder entry with an order at least RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT in
size then we need to shift the index by 'shift' before we start walking
back up the tree, or we will end up not setting tags on higher entries,
and then mistakenly thinking that entries below a certain point in the
tree are not tagged.
If the first index we examine is a sibling entry of a tagged multiorder
entry, we were not tagging it. We need to examine the canonical entry,
and the easiest way to do that is to use radix_tree_descend(). We then
have to skip over sibling slots when looking for the next entry in the
tree or we will end up walking back to the canonical entry.
Add several tests for radix_tree_range_tag_if_tagged().
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Linus Torvalds
Matthew Wilcox
Johannes Weiner
Vladimir Davydov
Kirill A. Shutemov
Matthew Wilcox
Ross Zwisler