The principal motivation for this was to try and eliminate the
struct_mutex from i915_gem_suspend - but we still need to hold the mutex
current for the i915_gem_context_lost(). (The issue there is that there
may be an indirect lockdep cycle between cpu_hotplug (i.e. suspend) and
struct_mutex via the stop_machine().) For the moment, enabling last
request tracking for the engine, allows us to do busyness checking and
waiting without requiring the struct_mutex - which is useful in its own
right.
As a side-effect of having a robust means for tracking engine busyness,
we can replace our other busyness heuristic, that of comparing against
the last submitted seqno. For paranoid reasons, we have a semi-ordered
check of that seqno inside the hangchecker, which we can now improve to
an ordered check of the engine's busyness (removing a locked xchg in the
process).
v2: Pass along "bool interruptible" as being unlocked we cannot rely on
i915->mm.interruptible being stable or even under our control.
v3: Replace check Ironlake i915_gpu_busy() with the common precalculated value
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470388464-28458-6-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Before suspending (or unloading), we would first wait upon all rendering
to be completed and then disable the rings. This later step is a remanent
from DRI1 days when we did not use request tracking for all operations
upon the ring. Now that we are sure we are waiting upon the very last
operation by the engine, we can forgo clobbering the ring registers,
though we do keep the assert that the engine is indeed idle before
sleeping.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470388464-28458-5-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Space reservation is already safe with respect to the ring->size
modulus, but hardware only expects to see values in the range
0...ring->size-1 (inclusive) and so requires the modulus to prevent us
writing the value ring->size instead of 0. As this is only required for
the register itself, we can defer the modulus to the register update and
not perform it after every command packet. We keep the
intel_ring_advance() around in the code to provide demarcation for the
end-of-packet (which then can be compared against intel_ring_begin() as
the number of dwords emitted must match the reserved space).
v2: Assert that the ring size is a power-of-two to match assumptions in
the code. Simplify the comment before writing the tail value to explain
why the modulus is necessary.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470174640-18242-13-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Rather than passing a complete set of GPU cache domains for either
invalidation or for flushing, or even both, just pass a single parameter
to the engine->emit_flush to determine the required operations.
engine->emit_flush(GPU, 0) -> engine->emit_flush(EMIT_INVALIDATE)
engine->emit_flush(0, GPU) -> engine->emit_flush(EMIT_FLUSH)
engine->emit_flush(GPU, GPU) -> engine->emit_flush(EMIT_FLUSH | EMIT_INVALIDATE)
This allows us to extend the behaviour easily in future, for example if
we want just a command barrier without the overhead of flushing.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470174640-18242-8-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The state stored in this struct is not only the information about the
buffer object, but the ring used to communicate with the hardware. Using
buffer here is overly specific and, for me at least, conflates with the
notion of buffer objects themselves.
s/struct intel_ringbuffer/struct intel_ring/
s/enum intel_ring_hangcheck/enum intel_engine_hangcheck/
s/describe_ctx_ringbuf()/describe_ctx_ring()/
s/intel_ring_get_active_head()/intel_engine_get_active_head()/
s/intel_ring_sync_index()/intel_engine_sync_index()/
s/intel_ring_init_seqno()/intel_engine_init_seqno()/
s/ring_stuck()/engine_stuck()/
s/intel_cleanup_engine()/intel_engine_cleanup()/
s/intel_stop_engine()/intel_engine_stop()/
s/intel_pin_and_map_ringbuffer_obj()/intel_pin_and_map_ring()/
s/intel_unpin_ringbuffer()/intel_unpin_ring()/
s/intel_engine_create_ringbuffer()/intel_engine_create_ring()/
s/intel_ring_flush_all_caches()/intel_engine_flush_all_caches()/
s/intel_ring_invalidate_all_caches()/intel_engine_invalidate_all_caches()/
s/intel_ringbuffer_free()/intel_ring_free()/
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469432687-22756-15-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470174640-18242-4-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Chris Wilson