The semantic patch that makes this change is available
in scripts/coccinelle/api/memdup.cocci.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
According to rfc5661 18.50, implement DESTROY_CLIENTID operation.
Signed-off-by: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
RFC5661 says:
The client may set one or both of
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_SIGNAL_DELEG_WHEN_RESRC_AVAIL and
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_PUSH_DELEG_WHEN_UNCONTENDED.
Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@tonian.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
This should be a bitwise negate here. It silences a Sparse warning:
fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c:693:16: warning: dubious: x & !y
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
I'd rather put more of these sorts of checks into standardized xdr
decoders for the various types rather than have them cluttering up the
core logic in nfs4proc.c and nfs4state.c.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Use a separate stateid idr per client, and lookup a stateid by first
finding the client, then looking up the stateid relative to that client.
Also some minor refactoring.
This allows us to improve error returns: we can return expired when the
clientid is not found and bad_stateid when the clientid is found but not
the stateid, as opposed to returning expired for both cases.
I hope this will also help to replace the state lock mostly by a
per-client lock, but that hasn't been done yet.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Test_stateid is 4.1-only and only allowed after a sequence operation, so
this check is unnecessary.
Cc: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Keep around an unhashed copy of the final stateid after the last close
using an openowner, and when identifying a replay, match against that
stateid instead of just against the open owner id. Free it the next
time the seqid is bumped or the stateowner is destroyed.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
For checking the size of reply before calling a operation,
we need try to get maxsize of the operation's reply.
v3: using new method as Bruce said,
"we could handle operations in two different ways:
- For operations that actually change something (write, rename,
open, close, ...), do it the way we're doing it now: be
very careful to estimate the size of the response before even
processing the operation.
- For operations that don't change anything (read, getattr, ...)
just go ahead and do the operation. If you realize after the
fact that the response is too large, then return the error at
that point.
So we'd add another flag to op_flags: say, OP_MODIFIES_SOMETHING. And for
operations with OP_MODIFIES_SOMETHING set, we'd do the first thing. For
operations without it set, we'd do the second."
Signed-off-by: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
[bfields@redhat.com: crash, don't attempt to handle, undefined op_rsize_bop]
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
The current code is sort of hackish in that it assumes a referral is always
matched to an export. When we add support for junctions that may not be the
case.
We can replace nfsd4_path() with a function that encodes the components
directly from the dentries. Since nfsd4_path is currently the only user of
the 'ex_pathname' field in struct svc_export, this has the added benefit
of allowing us to get rid of that.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
The stateowner has some fields that only make sense for openowners, and
some that only make sense for lockowners, and I find it a lot clearer if
those are separated out.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Now that the replay owner is in the cstate we can remove it from a lot
of other individual operations and further simplify
nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op().
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Set the stateowner associated with a replay in one spot in
nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op() and keep it in cstate. This allows removing
a few lines of boilerplate from all the nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op()
callers.
Also turn ENCODE_SEQID_OP_TAIL into a function while we're here.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
The values here represent highest slotid numbers. Since slotid's are
numbered starting from zero, the highest should be one less than the
number of slots.
Reported-by: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
The nfsd4 code has a bunch of special exceptions for error returns which
map nfserr_symlink to other errors.
In fact, the spec makes it clear that nfserr_symlink is to be preferred
over less specific errors where possible.
The patch that introduced it back in 2.6.4 is "kNFSd: correct symlink
related error returns.", which claims that these special exceptions are
represent an NFSv4 break from v2/v3 tradition--when in fact the symlink
error was introduced with v4.
I suspect what happened was pynfs tests were written that were overly
faithful to the (known-incomplete) rfc3530 error return lists, and then
code was fixed up mindlessly to make the tests pass.
Delete these unnecessary exceptions.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
A slightly unconventional approach to make the code more compact I could
live with, but let's give the poor reader *some* chance.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
The set of errors here does *not* agree with the set of errors specified
in the rfc!
While we're there, turn this macros into a function, for the usual
reasons, and move it to the one place where it's actually used.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
It's sort of ridiculous that we've never had a working reply cache for
NFSv4.
On the other hand, we may still not: our current reply cache is likely
not very good, especially in the TCP case (which is the only case that
matters for v4). What we really need here is some serious testing.
Anyway, here's a start.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>