lockdep: get_user_chars() redo

Generic, states independent, get_user_chars().

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:53:47 +01:00
committed by Ingo Molnar
parent 3ff176ca47
commit f510b233cf
4 changed files with 36 additions and 31 deletions
+17 -13
View File
@@ -27,33 +27,37 @@ lock-class.
State
-----
The validator tracks lock-class usage history into 5 separate state bits:
The validator tracks lock-class usage history into 4n + 1 separate state bits:
- 'ever held in hardirq context' [ == hardirq-safe ]
- 'ever held in softirq context' [ == softirq-safe ]
- 'ever held with hardirqs enabled' [ == hardirq-unsafe ]
- 'ever held with softirqs and hardirqs enabled' [ == softirq-unsafe ]
- 'ever held in STATE context'
- 'ever head as readlock in STATE context'
- 'ever head with STATE enabled'
- 'ever head as readlock with STATE enabled'
Where STATE can be either one of (kernel/lockdep_states.h)
- hardirq
- softirq
- reclaim_fs
- 'ever used' [ == !unused ]
When locking rules are violated, these 4 state bits are presented in the
locking error messages, inside curlies. A contrived example:
When locking rules are violated, these state bits are presented in the
locking error messages, inside curlies. A contrived example:
modprobe/2287 is trying to acquire lock:
(&sio_locks[i].lock){--..}, at: [<c02867fd>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24
(&sio_locks[i].lock){-.-...}, at: [<c02867fd>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24
but task is already holding lock:
(&sio_locks[i].lock){--..}, at: [<c02867fd>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24
(&sio_locks[i].lock){-.-...}, at: [<c02867fd>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24
The bit position indicates hardirq, softirq, hardirq-read,
softirq-read respectively, and the character displayed in each
indicates:
The bit position indicates STATE, STATE-read, for each of the states listed
above, and the character displayed in each indicates:
'.' acquired while irqs disabled
'+' acquired in irq context
'-' acquired with irqs enabled
'?' read acquired in irq context with irqs enabled.
'?' acquired in irq context with irqs enabled.
Unused mutexes cannot be part of the cause of an error.