You've already forked linux-apfs
mirror of
https://github.com/linux-apfs/linux-apfs.git
synced 2026-05-01 15:00:59 -07:00
kill I_LOCK
After I_SYNC was split from I_LOCK the leftover is always used together with I_NEW and thus superflous. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Al Viro
parent
7a0ad10c36
commit
eaff8079d4
+13
-13
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static void wake_up_inode(struct inode *inode)
|
||||
* Prevent speculative execution through spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
|
||||
*/
|
||||
smp_mb();
|
||||
wake_up_bit(&inode->i_state, __I_LOCK);
|
||||
wake_up_bit(&inode->i_state, __I_NEW);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
@@ -690,17 +690,17 @@ void unlock_new_inode(struct inode *inode)
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This is special! We do not need the spinlock when clearing I_LOCK,
|
||||
* This is special! We do not need the spinlock when clearing I_NEW,
|
||||
* because we're guaranteed that nobody else tries to do anything about
|
||||
* the state of the inode when it is locked, as we just created it (so
|
||||
* there can be no old holders that haven't tested I_LOCK).
|
||||
* there can be no old holders that haven't tested I_NEW).
|
||||
* However we must emit the memory barrier so that other CPUs reliably
|
||||
* see the clearing of I_LOCK after the other inode initialisation has
|
||||
* see the clearing of I_NEW after the other inode initialisation has
|
||||
* completed.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
smp_mb();
|
||||
WARN_ON((inode->i_state & (I_LOCK|I_NEW)) != (I_LOCK|I_NEW));
|
||||
inode->i_state &= ~(I_LOCK|I_NEW);
|
||||
WARN_ON(!(inode->i_state & I_NEW));
|
||||
inode->i_state &= ~I_NEW;
|
||||
wake_up_inode(inode);
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(unlock_new_inode);
|
||||
@@ -731,7 +731,7 @@ static struct inode *get_new_inode(struct super_block *sb,
|
||||
goto set_failed;
|
||||
|
||||
__inode_add_to_lists(sb, head, inode);
|
||||
inode->i_state = I_LOCK|I_NEW;
|
||||
inode->i_state = I_NEW;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Return the locked inode with I_NEW set, the
|
||||
@@ -778,7 +778,7 @@ static struct inode *get_new_inode_fast(struct super_block *sb,
|
||||
if (!old) {
|
||||
inode->i_ino = ino;
|
||||
__inode_add_to_lists(sb, head, inode);
|
||||
inode->i_state = I_LOCK|I_NEW;
|
||||
inode->i_state = I_NEW;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Return the locked inode with I_NEW set, the
|
||||
@@ -1083,7 +1083,7 @@ int insert_inode_locked(struct inode *inode)
|
||||
ino_t ino = inode->i_ino;
|
||||
struct hlist_head *head = inode_hashtable + hash(sb, ino);
|
||||
|
||||
inode->i_state |= I_LOCK|I_NEW;
|
||||
inode->i_state |= I_NEW;
|
||||
while (1) {
|
||||
struct hlist_node *node;
|
||||
struct inode *old = NULL;
|
||||
@@ -1120,7 +1120,7 @@ int insert_inode_locked4(struct inode *inode, unsigned long hashval,
|
||||
struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
|
||||
struct hlist_head *head = inode_hashtable + hash(sb, hashval);
|
||||
|
||||
inode->i_state |= I_LOCK|I_NEW;
|
||||
inode->i_state |= I_NEW;
|
||||
|
||||
while (1) {
|
||||
struct hlist_node *node;
|
||||
@@ -1510,7 +1510,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(inode_wait);
|
||||
* until the deletion _might_ have completed. Callers are responsible
|
||||
* to recheck inode state.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* It doesn't matter if I_LOCK is not set initially, a call to
|
||||
* It doesn't matter if I_NEW is not set initially, a call to
|
||||
* wake_up_inode() after removing from the hash list will DTRT.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This is called with inode_lock held.
|
||||
@@ -1518,8 +1518,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(inode_wait);
|
||||
static void __wait_on_freeing_inode(struct inode *inode)
|
||||
{
|
||||
wait_queue_head_t *wq;
|
||||
DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wait, &inode->i_state, __I_LOCK);
|
||||
wq = bit_waitqueue(&inode->i_state, __I_LOCK);
|
||||
DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wait, &inode->i_state, __I_NEW);
|
||||
wq = bit_waitqueue(&inode->i_state, __I_NEW);
|
||||
prepare_to_wait(wq, &wait.wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
|
||||
schedule();
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user