apfs/linux-apfs
0
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/linux-apfs/linux-apfs.git synced 2026-05-01 15:00:59 -07:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

cpufreq: Handle sorted frequency tables more efficiently

Browse Source 
cpufreq drivers aren't required to provide a sorted frequency table
today, and even the ones which provide a sorted table aren't handled
efficiently by cpufreq core.

This patch adds infrastructure to verify if the freq-table provided by
the drivers is sorted or not, and use efficient helpers if they are
sorted.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Viresh Kumar
2016-06-27 16:04:07 +05:30
committed by Rafael J. Wysocki
parent 8d540ea792
commit da0c6dc00c
2 changed files with 296 additions and 11 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
+65 -8
View File
@@ -113,9 +113,9 @@ int cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify);
int cpufreq_frequency_table_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq,
unsigned int relation)
int cpufreq_table_index_unsorted(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq,
unsigned int relation)
{
struct cpufreq_frequency_table optimal = {
.driver_data = ~0,
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
table[index].frequency);
return index;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_frequency_table_target);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_table_index_unsorted);
int cpufreq_frequency_table_get_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int freq)
@@ -297,15 +297,72 @@ struct freq_attr *cpufreq_generic_attr[] = {
};
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_generic_attr);
static int set_freq_table_sorted(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *table = policy->freq_table;
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *prev = NULL;
int ascending = 0;
policy->freq_table_sorted = CPUFREQ_TABLE_UNSORTED;
cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
if (!prev) {
prev = pos;
continue;
}
if (pos->frequency == prev->frequency) {
pr_warn("Duplicate freq-table entries: %u\n",
pos->frequency);
return -EINVAL;
}
/* Frequency increased from prev to pos */
if (pos->frequency > prev->frequency) {
/* But frequency was decreasing earlier */
if (ascending < 0) {
pr_debug("Freq table is unsorted\n");
return 0;
}
ascending++;
} else {
/* Frequency decreased from prev to pos */
/* But frequency was increasing earlier */
if (ascending > 0) {
pr_debug("Freq table is unsorted\n");
return 0;
}
ascending--;
}
prev = pos;
}
if (ascending > 0)
policy->freq_table_sorted = CPUFREQ_TABLE_SORTED_ASCENDING;
else
policy->freq_table_sorted = CPUFREQ_TABLE_SORTED_DESCENDING;
pr_debug("Freq table is sorted in %s order\n",
ascending > 0 ? "ascending" : "descending");
return 0;
}
int cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table)
{
int ret = cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, table);
int ret;
if (!ret)
policy->freq_table = table;
ret = cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, table);
if (ret)
return ret;
return ret;
policy->freq_table = table;
return set_freq_table_sorted(policy);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_table_validate_and_show);