You've already forked linux-apfs
mirror of
https://github.com/linux-apfs/linux-apfs.git
synced 2026-05-01 15:00:59 -07:00
KVM: Introduce CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQ_ROUTING
Quite a bit of code in KVM has been conditionalized on availability of IOAPIC emulation. However, most of it is generically applicable to platforms that don't have an IOPIC, but a different type of irq chip. Make code that only relies on IRQ routing, not an APIC itself, on CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQ_ROUTING, so that we can reuse it later. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -6,6 +6,9 @@ config HAVE_KVM
|
||||
config HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP
|
||||
bool
|
||||
|
||||
config HAVE_KVM_IRQ_ROUTING
|
||||
bool
|
||||
|
||||
config HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD
|
||||
bool
|
||||
select EVENTFD
|
||||
|
||||
+3
-3
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
#include "iodev.h"
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef __KVM_HAVE_IOAPIC
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQ_ROUTING
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* --------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
* irqfd: Allows an fd to be used to inject an interrupt to the guest
|
||||
@@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ fail:
|
||||
void
|
||||
kvm_eventfd_init(struct kvm *kvm)
|
||||
{
|
||||
#ifdef __KVM_HAVE_IOAPIC
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQ_ROUTING
|
||||
spin_lock_init(&kvm->irqfds.lock);
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->irqfds.items);
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->irqfds.resampler_list);
|
||||
@@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ kvm_eventfd_init(struct kvm *kvm)
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->ioeventfds);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef __KVM_HAVE_IOAPIC
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQ_ROUTING
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* shutdown any irqfd's that match fd+gsi
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
+1
-1
@@ -2404,7 +2404,7 @@ static long kvm_dev_ioctl_check_extension_generic(long arg)
|
||||
case KVM_CAP_SIGNAL_MSI:
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
#ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQ_ROUTING
|
||||
case KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING:
|
||||
return KVM_MAX_IRQ_ROUTES;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user