You've already forked linux-apfs
mirror of
https://github.com/linux-apfs/linux-apfs.git
synced 2026-05-01 15:00:59 -07:00
percpu: update incorrect comment for this_cpu_*() operations
this_cpu_*() ops have been protected against both preemption and interrupts for quite a while now. We apparently forgot to update the comment. Fix it. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -488,10 +488,8 @@ do { \
|
|||||||
#define __this_cpu_dec_return(pcp) __this_cpu_add_return(pcp, -1)
|
#define __this_cpu_dec_return(pcp) __this_cpu_add_return(pcp, -1)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* Operations with implied preemption protection. These operations can be
|
* Operations with implied preemption/interrupt protection. These
|
||||||
* used without worrying about preemption. Note that interrupts may still
|
* operations can be used without worrying about preemption or interrupt.
|
||||||
* occur while an operation is in progress and if the interrupt modifies
|
|
||||||
* the variable too then RMW actions may not be reliable.
|
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
#define this_cpu_read(pcp) __pcpu_size_call_return(this_cpu_read_, pcp)
|
#define this_cpu_read(pcp) __pcpu_size_call_return(this_cpu_read_, pcp)
|
||||||
#define this_cpu_write(pcp, val) __pcpu_size_call(this_cpu_write_, pcp, val)
|
#define this_cpu_write(pcp, val) __pcpu_size_call(this_cpu_write_, pcp, val)
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user