You've already forked linux-apfs
mirror of
https://github.com/linux-apfs/linux-apfs.git
synced 2026-05-01 15:00:59 -07:00
Merge branch 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull locking updates from Ingo Molnar:
"The main changes in this cycle were:
- Implement wraparound-safe refcount_t and kref_t types based on
generic atomic primitives (Peter Zijlstra)
- Improve and fix the ww_mutex code (Nicolai Hähnle)
- Add self-tests to the ww_mutex code (Chris Wilson)
- Optimize percpu-rwsems with the 'rcuwait' mechanism (Davidlohr
Bueso)
- Micro-optimize the current-task logic all around the core kernel
(Davidlohr Bueso)
- Tidy up after recent optimizations: remove stale code and APIs,
clean up the code (Waiman Long)
- ... plus misc fixes, updates and cleanups"
* 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (50 commits)
fork: Fix task_struct alignment
locking/spinlock/debug: Remove spinlock lockup detection code
lockdep: Fix incorrect condition to print bug msgs for MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS
lkdtm: Convert to refcount_t testing
kref: Implement 'struct kref' using refcount_t
refcount_t: Introduce a special purpose refcount type
sched/wake_q: Clarify queue reinit comment
sched/wait, rcuwait: Fix typo in comment
locking/mutex: Fix lockdep_assert_held() fail
locking/rtmutex: Flip unlikely() branch to likely() in __rt_mutex_slowlock()
locking/rwsem: Reinit wake_q after use
locking/rwsem: Remove unnecessary atomic_long_t casts
jump_labels: Move header guard #endif down where it belongs
locking/atomic, kref: Implement kref_put_lock()
locking/ww_mutex: Turn off __must_check for now
locking/atomic, kref: Avoid more abuse
locking/atomic, kref: Use kref_get_unless_zero() more
locking/atomic, kref: Kill kref_sub()
locking/atomic, kref: Add kref_read()
locking/atomic, kref: Add KREF_INIT()
...
This commit is contained in:
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline void __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (unlikely(atomic_long_inc_return_acquire((atomic_long_t *)&sem->count) <= 0))
|
||||
if (unlikely(atomic_long_inc_return_acquire(&sem->count) <= 0))
|
||||
rwsem_down_read_failed(sem);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
|
||||
long tmp;
|
||||
|
||||
tmp = atomic_long_add_return_acquire(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
|
||||
(atomic_long_t *)&sem->count);
|
||||
&sem->count);
|
||||
if (unlikely(tmp != RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS))
|
||||
rwsem_down_write_failed(sem);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static inline int __down_write_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
|
||||
long tmp;
|
||||
|
||||
tmp = atomic_long_add_return_acquire(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
|
||||
(atomic_long_t *)&sem->count);
|
||||
&sem->count);
|
||||
if (unlikely(tmp != RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS))
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(rwsem_down_write_failed_killable(sem)))
|
||||
return -EINTR;
|
||||
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static inline void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
|
||||
{
|
||||
long tmp;
|
||||
|
||||
tmp = atomic_long_dec_return_release((atomic_long_t *)&sem->count);
|
||||
tmp = atomic_long_dec_return_release(&sem->count);
|
||||
if (unlikely(tmp < -1 && (tmp & RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK) == 0))
|
||||
rwsem_wake(sem);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static inline void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
|
||||
static inline void __up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (unlikely(atomic_long_sub_return_release(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
|
||||
(atomic_long_t *)&sem->count) < 0))
|
||||
&sem->count) < 0))
|
||||
rwsem_wake(sem);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -120,8 +120,7 @@ static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
|
||||
* read-locked region is ok to be re-ordered into the
|
||||
* write side. As such, rely on RELEASE semantics.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
tmp = atomic_long_add_return_release(-RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS,
|
||||
(atomic_long_t *)&sem->count);
|
||||
tmp = atomic_long_add_return_release(-RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, &sem->count);
|
||||
if (tmp < 0)
|
||||
rwsem_downgrade_wake(sem);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user