membarrier: Provide expedited private command

Implement MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED with IPIs using cpumask built
from all runqueues for which current thread's mm is the same as the
thread calling sys_membarrier. It executes faster than the non-expedited
variant (no blocking). It also works on NOHZ_FULL configurations.

Scheduler-wise, it requires a memory barrier before and after context
switching between processes (which have different mm). The memory
barrier before context switch is already present. For the barrier after
context switch:

* Our TSO archs can do RELEASE without being a full barrier. Look at
  x86 spin_unlock() being a regular STORE for example.  But for those
  archs, all atomics imply smp_mb and all of them have atomic ops in
  switch_mm() for mm_cpumask(), and on x86 the CR3 load acts as a full
  barrier.

* From all weakly ordered machines, only ARM64 and PPC can do RELEASE,
  the rest does indeed do smp_mb(), so there the spin_unlock() is a full
  barrier and we're good.

* ARM64 has a very heavy barrier in switch_to(), which suffices.

* PPC just removed its barrier from switch_to(), but appears to be
  talking about adding something to switch_mm(). So add a
  smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() for now, until this is settled on the PPC
  side.

Changes since v3:
- Properly document the memory barriers provided by each architecture.

Changes since v2:
- Address comments from Peter Zijlstra,
- Add smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() after finish_lock_switch() in
  finish_task_switch() to add the memory barrier we need after storing
  to rq->curr. This is much simpler than the previous approach relying
  on atomic_dec_and_test() in mmdrop(), which actually added a memory
  barrier in the common case of switching between userspace processes.
- Return -EINVAL when MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED is used on a nohz_full
  kernel, rather than having the whole membarrier system call returning
  -ENOSYS. Indeed, CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED is compatible with nohz_full.
  Adapt the CMD_QUERY mask accordingly.

Changes since v1:
- move membarrier code under kernel/sched/ because it uses the
  scheduler runqueue,
- only add the barrier when we switch from a kernel thread. The case
  where we switch from a user-space thread is already handled by
  the atomic_dec_and_test() in mmdrop().
- add a comment to mmdrop() documenting the requirement on the implicit
  memory barrier.

CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CC: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
CC: Andrew Hunter <ahh@google.com>
CC: Maged Michael <maged.michael@gmail.com>
CC: gromer@google.com
CC: Avi Kivity <avi@scylladb.com>
CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
CC: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Dave Watson <davejwatson@fb.com>

kernel/sched/core.c

@@ -2640,6 +2640,16 @@ static struct rq *finish_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
 	prev_state = prev->state;
 	vtime_task_switch(prev);
 	perf_event_task_sched_in(prev, current);
+	/*
+	 * The membarrier system call requires a full memory barrier
+	 * after storing to rq->curr, before going back to user-space.
+	 *
+	 * TODO: This smp_mb__after_unlock_lock can go away if PPC end
+	 * up adding a full barrier to switch_mm(), or we should figure
+	 * out if a smp_mb__after_unlock_lock is really the proper API
+	 * to use.
+	 */
+	smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
 	finish_lock_switch(rq, prev);
 	finish_arch_post_lock_switch();
 
@@ -3329,6 +3339,21 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(bool preempt)
 	if (likely(prev != next)) {
 		rq->nr_switches++;
 		rq->curr = next;
+		/*
+		 * The membarrier system call requires each architecture
+		 * to have a full memory barrier after updating
+		 * rq->curr, before returning to user-space. For TSO
+		 * (e.g. x86), the architecture must provide its own
+		 * barrier in switch_mm(). For weakly ordered machines
+		 * for which spin_unlock() acts as a full memory
+		 * barrier, finish_lock_switch() in common code takes
+		 * care of this barrier. For weakly ordered machines for
+		 * which spin_unlock() acts as a RELEASE barrier (only
+		 * arm64 and PowerPC), arm64 has a full barrier in
+		 * switch_to(), and PowerPC has
+		 * smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() before
+		 * finish_lock_switch().
+		 */
 		++*switch_count;
 
 		trace_sched_switch(preempt, prev, next);