mirror of
https://github.com/linux-apfs/apfstests.git
synced 2026-05-01 15:01:44 -07:00
21616145d2
There have been a couple of logic bugs in `btrfs_get_extent()` which
could lead to spurious -EEXIST errors from read or write. This test
exercises those conditions by having two threads race to add an
extent to the extent map.
This is fixed by Linux commit 8dff9c853410 ("Btrfs: deal with
duplciates during extent_map insertion in btrfs_get_extent") and the
patch "Btrfs: deal with existing encompassing extent map in
btrfs_get_extent()"
(http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=147873402311143&w=2).
Although the bug is Btrfs-specific, nothing about the test is.
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
3 lines
43 B
Plaintext
3 lines
43 B
Plaintext
QA output created by 391
|
|
Silence is golden
|