Generic/300 fails when run on a test filesystem that does not
support fallocate(). It uses fio's falloc ioengine to generate part
of its I/O load and both allocates blocks and punches holes. This
causes EOPNOTSUPP failures when the test is run on indirect
block-mapped ext4 filesystems or pre-3.14 ext4 filesystems created
with bigalloc.
Verify that the test filesystem supports fallocate() before
proceeding with the test, checking for both block allocation and
hole punching capabilities. Also, delete any pre-existing test
output.
Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Check with RENAME_EXCHANGE flag. This flag indicates that the
source and destination files are to be exchanged.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Check with RENAME_NOREPLACE flag. This flag indicates that the
rename must fail if the target of the rename exists.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Check with zero flags. This is what rename(2) and renameat(2) now
call, so this actually tests the behavior of these syscalls as well.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
In commit 21723cdb, renumbering the test wasn't completed entirely,
leaving the output file with a wrong test number. It should be 022,
fix it.
[dchinner: Yup, my mistake. editted the commit message to reflect
that.]
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
generic/204 fails on device with Advanced Format of 4096 bytes per
physical sector and when partition starts at the 4K boundary/./In
this case filesystem sector/block size will be of 4096 bytes size
and _scratch_mkfs_sized fails because mkfs reports that 5Mb log size
is not enough to create a filesystem, for example attempt to make
filesystem on such partition:
mkfs.xfs -f -bsize=4096 -l size=5m -d size=109051904 /dev/sdb2"
results to:
"log size 1280 blocks too small, minimum size is 1605 blocks"
and generic/204 fails with ENOSPC before it has finished creating
the necessary files. Log size of 7MB is enough for this test to pass.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Tsvetkov <alexander.tsvetkov@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
mke2fs ext4 without extent feature will fail if 64bit feature is
enabled in mke2fs.conf
mke2fs 1.42.9 (28-Dec-2013)
Extents MUST be enabled for a 64-bit filesystem. Pass -O extents to rectify.
So disable 64bit feature together with extent explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Regression test for the btrfs incremental send feature, where the kernel
would incorrectly consider a range of a file as a hole and send a stream
of 0 bytes to the destination (send stream) that would overwrite the
corresponding file region.
This issue is fixed by the following linux kernel btrfs patch:
Btrfs: send, fix data corruption due to incorrect hole detection
(https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3910081/)
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
The test shared/243 really is ext4 specific even though currently we
would run it on other file systems as well, it would not actually do any
testing.
So move it to ext4 specific directory and rename it to 002.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
There are couple of tests in shared directory which really should be
made generic, so move it. It is mostly collapse range tests, which
really can be generic to make super we test every file system which adds
collapse range support.
Here is what we're moving in this commit.
shared/001 -> generic/021
shared/002 -> generic/022
shared/003 -> generic/012
shared/004 -> generic/016
shared/005 -> generic/017
shared/218 -> generic/018
shared/305 -> generic/019
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Test fs by using up all inodes and check fs.
Also a regression test for xfsprogs commit
d586858 xfs_repair: fix sibling pointer tests in verify_dir2_path()
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This is based on xfs/242. This is very similar to ext4/001 however this
test has some tweaks to make it work test zero range on generic file
system. This includes turning off ext4 extents zeroout and disabling
the test for xfs on systems where PAGE_SIZE > 4096.
It is testing extent tree manipulation with fallocate zero range
operation.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Regression test for a btrfs incremental send issue where the kernel failed
to build paths strings. This resulted either in sending a wrong path string
to the send stream or entering an infinite loop when building it.
This happened in the following scenarios:
1) A directory was made a child of another directory which has a lower inode
number and has a pending move/rename operation or there's some non-direct
ancestor directory with a higher inode number that was renamed/moved too.
This made the incremental send code go into an infinite loop when building
a path string;
2) A directory was made a child of another directory which has a higher inode
number, but the new parent wasn't moved nor renamed. Instead some other
ancestor higher in the hierarchy, with an higher inode number too, was
moved/renamed too. This made the incremental send code go into an infinite
loop when building a path string;
3) An orphan directory is created and at least one of its non-immediate
descendent directories have a pending move/rename operation. This made
an incremental send issue to the send stream an invalid path string that
didn't account for the orphan ancestor directory.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Regression test for a btrfs incremental send issue where invalid paths for
utimes, chown and chmod operations were sent to the send stream, causing
btrfs receive to fail.
If a directory had a move/rename operation delayed, and none of its parent
directories, except for the immediate one, had delayed move/rename operations,
after processing the directory's references, the incremental send code would
issue invalid paths for utimes, chown and chmod operations.
This issue is fixed by the following linux kernel btrfs patch:
Btrfs: fix send issuing outdated paths for utimes, chown and chmod
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Regression test for btrfs incremental send issue where a rmdir instruction
is sent against an orphan directory inode which is not empty yet, causing
btrfs receive to fail when it attempts to remove the directory.
This issue is fixed by the following linux kernel btrfs patch:
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This test was written before a solution was in place, I think,
and so the expected output wasn't well tested.
The test does a loop of sparse writes from 6 to 0, but the
.out file expects 6 (not 7) extents. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
On old kernel we return EINVAL if hit the limits of maximum number of
ACLs but return E2BIG on new kernel, which cause the test failes on new
kernel as the output is mismatch to the goldens. This patch fix it by
updating the golden output with the new error message and replacing the
old error message with it via a filter.
Signed-off-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Add missing test for btrfs quota groups feature,test idea is to create
a parent qgroup that groups some subvolume groups, we try to write
some data into every subvolume and then check if we exceed parent
qgroup's limit size.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This is based on xfs/242. However it's better to make it file system
specific because the range can be zeroes either directly by writing
zeroes, or converting to unwritten extent, so the actual result might
differ from file system to file system. Also xfs results differ
depending on the page size which is not the case for ext4.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Add test for fallocate zero range at block boundary. This is similar to
the test xfs/290 however this one is generic and we're testing different
block sizes as well - namely 1k, 2k, 4k and 64k. Note that we're not
creating file systems with given block size buy rather test all 4
options.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Create new function _test_block_boundaries() which is testing content of
the blocks after the operation such as zero, or punch hole. The test is
doing the operation around block boundaries to assure correct behaviour
of the operation on block unaligned ranges.
This has been based on test xfs/290 which has been changed to use this
new function. A small change to the output file was required.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This is a regression test to verify that the restore feature of btrfs-progs
is able to correctly recover files that have compressed extents, specially when
the respective file extent items have a non-zero data offset field.
This issue is fixed by the following btrfs-progs patch:
Btrfs-progs: fix restore dealing with compressed extents
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Eric Whitney
Miklos Szeredi
Lukas Czerner
Alexander Tsvetkov
Eryu Guan
Filipe David Borba Manana
Hannes Frederic Sowa
Christoph Hellwig
Eric Sandeen
Dmitry Monakhov
Jie Liu
Wang Shilong