This is obviously wrong and makes ./check -r skip over tests on ext4
with "ext4 on $DEV not configured with metadata journaling".
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
The check script requires that it be run as root, so adding
individualized checks for this in each teat is not needed.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To avoid having many tests repeating the following pattern:
_load_flakey_table $FLAKEY_DROP_WRITES
_unmount_flakey
_load_flakey_table $FLAKEY_ALLOW_WRITES
_mount_flakey
add the helper function _flakey_drop_and_remount to remove
the existing duplicated code and serve as a shortcut.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
generic/085 was failing on a machine w/o devicemapper kernel
support because it requires the linear target, but didn't
explicitly test for it.
I could have cut & pasted _require_dm_linear(), but chose
to go the route of a generic helper, _require_dm_target $FOO,
because some day someone will need the zero target, the error
target, or who knows.
Add the helper, use it in test generic/085, and convert
_require_dm_flakey, _require_dm_snapshot, and
_dmerror_required with this new helper.
Reported-by: Angelo Dureghello <angelo.dureghello@nomovok.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
generic tests 039, 059 and 325 need _require_metadata_journaling too,
they use dm_flakey to trigger log replay. I've seen 039 and 059 failed
post-test fsck on ext2, 325 could possibly fail too.
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
The test case passes 32K as the offset value to msync. This fails on machines
with 64K page size. Fix this by creating a larger file and passing offset
values which are multiples of 64K.
Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This test is motivated by a btrfs issue where a ranged fsync would
prevent a subsequent fsync from persisting any extents that were
dirty at the time of the first fsync but that were outside the range
of that first fsync (which should have been persisted by the second
fsync).
This bug in btrfs is fixed by the following linux kernel patch:
Btrfs: fix fsync data loss after a ranged fsync
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Dave Chinner
Ilya Dryomov
Theodore Ts'o
Filipe Manana
Eric Sandeen
Eryu Guan
Chandan Rajendra