Commit Graph

200 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Christoph Hellwig 6fd9210bc9 fstests: add a seek group
This groups all tests exercising SEEK_DATA / SEEK_HOLE behavior.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
2019-02-21 09:48:27 +08:00
Filipe Manana 53fc54907b btrfs: test for corruption when reading compressed files
Regression test for read corruption of compressed and shared extents
after punching holes into a file. The same extent is shared by the
same file in consecutive ranges (without other extents in between).

This is motivated by a bug recently found in btrfs for which there
is a patch for the linux kernel titled:

  "Btrfs: fix corruption reading shared and compressed extents after hole
   punching"

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
2019-02-16 18:24:43 +08:00
Qu Wenruo 7f3a0bf60d btrfs: Test if btrfs will report false ENOSPC error balancing small metadata chunk
This is a test case for a long existing bug, caused by
over-estimated metadata space_info::bytes_may_use.

There is one proposed patch for btrfs-progs to fix it, titled:
"btrfs-progs: balance: Sync the fs before balancing metadata chunks"

The test case itself is almost the same as btrfs/181, which uses
small files to bump the reserved space to trigger the false alert.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
2019-01-30 09:39:08 +08:00
Qu Wenruo 3bea049648 btrfs: Test if btrfs will commit too many transactions for balance
Kernel commit 64403612b73a ("btrfs: rework
btrfs_check_space_for_delayed_refs") is introducing a regression for
btrfs balance performance.

Since that commit will cause btrfs to commit too many transactions
for nothing during balance/relocation, it will slow balance
dramatically even we only need to relocate several megabytes.

This test case will catch the problem by using super block
generation as failure criteria.

For small chunk relocated, we will commit 6 transactions for each
block group, and the test case should only have 2 block groups, it
should only commit 12 transactions.

This test case will use 120 as the threshold to detect the failure.

And in my test environment, with kernel fix btrfs committed 14
transactions. While without the fix btrfs committed 209
transactions.

So the test case should be enough to detect the regression, while still
keep the runtime small enough for failure.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
2019-01-30 09:39:08 +08:00
Qu Wenruo 04e1a5e067 btrfs: Test if btrfs hits EDQUOT without trying to reclaim some space
Commit a514d63882c3 ("btrfs: qgroup: Commit transaction in advance
to reduce early EDQUOT") is no longer forcing transaction commit to
reclaim space, and only commits transaction asynchronously in
advance to address it.

However the criteria used in async transaction commit is not
comprehensive, thus it doesn't reclaim space automatically.

This test case will check the behavior by:
1) Falloc a large padding file
   This file will take 90% of the qgroup limit

2) Sync the fs
   To reflect the qgroup changes

3) Delete the file
   Qgroup won't reclaim the space until transaction committed.

4) Try to write a file
   If kernel not fixed, qgroup will not automatically commit transaction
   to reclaim the freed space and hit EDQUOT.

This bug is going to be fixed by a patch for kernel titled:
"btrfs: qgroup: Make qgroup async transaction commit more aggressive".

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
2019-01-30 09:38:44 +08:00
Qu Wenruo 8fc1e7c157 btrfs: test for deadlock between snapshot delete and other read-write operations
Commit fb235dc06fac ("btrfs: qgroup: Move half of the qgroup
accounting time out of commit trans") could cause ABBA deadlock
between backref lookup with write lock hold (subvolume deletion) and
other read/write operations.

It's going to be fixed by "btrfs: qgroup: Don't trigger backref walk
at delayed ref insert time".

This test will generate pwrite background workload, along with
constant subvolume creation and deletion to trigger the bug.

It needs some time to generate enough files to bump the tree height
to trigger the bug.

In my test environment, with 'unsafe' cache mode for the VM, it
triggers the bug at around 70~90 seconds. So I leave the default
runtime to 120s to make sure the bug will be triggered.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
2019-01-12 15:44:04 +08:00
Qu Wenruo a4235f29f7 btrfs: Make seed device test cases into their own group
btrfs/16[123] are all seed device related test cases, make them into
'seed' group.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
2019-01-10 22:14:21 +08:00
Filipe Manana ad91ed8a66 btrfs: test send after radical changes in a complex directory hierarchy
Test an incremental send operation in a scenario where the relationship
of ancestor-descendant between multiple directories is inversed, and
where multiple directories that were previously ancestors of another
directory now become descendents of multiple directories that used to be
their ancestors in the parent snapshot. This used to trigger an
infinite loop in the kernel code.

This is motivated by a bug found in btrfs which is fixed by the following
patch for the linux kernel:

  "Btrfs: send, fix infinite loop due to directory rename dependencies"

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
2018-11-18 20:48:30 +08:00
Omar Sandoval 96c40c9fc4 btrfs: test balance and resize with an active swap file
Make sure we don't shrink the device past an active swap file, but allow
shrinking otherwise, as well as growing and balance.

Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
2018-11-11 22:36:15 +08:00
Omar Sandoval 7f67220a23 btrfs: test device add/remove/replace with an active swap file
Make sure that we don't remove or replace a device with an active swap
file but can add, remove, and replace other devices.

Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
2018-11-11 22:34:40 +08:00
Omar Sandoval 1ab8f151db btrfs: test swap files on multiple devices
Swap files currently need to exist on exactly one device in exactly one
place.

Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
2018-11-11 22:33:12 +08:00
Omar Sandoval 42fc98da1b btrfs: test invalid operations on a swap file
Btrfs forbids some operations which should not be done on a swap file.

Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
2018-11-11 22:33:12 +08:00
Omar Sandoval d69918100b btrfs: test swap file activation restrictions
Swap files on Btrfs have some restrictions not applicable to other
filesystems.

Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
2018-11-11 22:30:28 +08:00
Filipe Manana 03f07aaba6 fstests: add some tests to the 'log' group that use dmflakey
Some tests that use dmflakey to test filesystem consistency after a power
failure are in the 'log' group while others are not. So fix the
incosistency and put them all under the 'log' group.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
2018-10-28 21:23:26 +08:00
Filipe Manana 3193e55a97 btrfs: fix classification of a couple btrfs tests
Test btrfs/108 does not test collapse, in fact btrfs does not even support
the fallocate collapse operation, so remove it.
Test btrfs/159 does not test collapse either, it tests hole punching, so
replace the collapse group with the punch group.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
2018-10-28 21:15:26 +08:00
Anand Jain 4c2c678cd5 btrfs: test unaligned punch hole at ENOSPC
Try to punch hole with unaligned size and offset when the FS is
full. Mainly holes are punched at locations which are unaligned
with the file extent boundaries when the FS is full by data.
As the punching holes at unaligned location will involve
truncating blocks instead of just dropping the extents, it shall
involve reserving data and metadata space for delalloc and so data
alloc fails as the FS is full.

btrfs_punch_hole()
 btrfs_truncate_block()
   btrfs_check_data_free_space() <-- ENOSPC

We don't fail punch hole if the holes are aligned with the file
extent boundaries as it shall involve just dropping the related
extents, without truncating data extent blocks.

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
2018-10-06 17:40:09 +08:00
Qu Wenruo 55566e7f7c btrfs: Add test for corrupted childless qgroup numbers
This bug is exposed by populating a high level qgroup, and then make
it childless with old qgroup numbers, and finally do rescan.

Normally rescan should zero out all qgroups' accounting number, but
due to a kernel bug which won't mark childless qgroups dirty, their
on-disk data is never updated, thus old numbers remain and cause
qgroup corruption.

Fixed by the following kernel patch:
"btrfs: qgroup: Dirty all qgroups before rescan"

[Eryu: removed useless _filter_xfs_io]

Reported-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
2018-08-19 20:10:58 +08:00
Filipe Manana 7931e0696c btrfs: test writing into unwritten extent right before snapshotting
Test that if we write into an unwritten extent of a file when there
is no more space left to allocate in the filesystem and then
snapshot the file's subvolume, after a clean shutdown the data was
not lost.

This test is motivated by a bug found by Robbie Ko for which there
is a fix whose patch title is:

  "Btrfs: fix unexpected failure of nocow buffered writes after
   snapshotting when low on space"

Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
2018-08-12 19:42:40 +08:00
Filipe Manana df949b94f0 btrfs: test send with prealloc extent beyond EOF and hole punching
Test that an incremental send operation produces correct results if
a file that has a prealloc (unwritten) extent beyond its EOF gets a
hole punched in a section of that prealloc extent.

This test is motivated by a bug found in btrfs which is fixed by a
patch for the linux kernel titled:

 "Btrfs: send, fix incorrect file layout after hole punching beyond eof"

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
2018-08-05 20:51:08 +08:00
Filipe Manana 6eab1aafe2 btrfs: test send with snapshots that have files deleted while open
Test that we are able to do send operations when one of the source
snapshots (or subvolume) has a file that is deleted while there is
still a open file descriptor for that file.

This test is motivated by a bug found in btrfs which is fixed by a patch
for the linux kernel titled:

  "Btrfs: fix send failure when root has deleted files still open"

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
2018-07-29 13:13:58 +08:00
Qu Wenruo 73576ea71e btrfs: test if btrfs will corrupt nodatasum compressed extent when replacing device
This is a long existing bug (from 2012) but exposed by a reporter
recently, that when compressed extent without data csum get written
to device-replace target device, the written data is in fact
uncompressed data other than the original compressed data.

And since btrfs still consider the data is compressed and will try
to read it as compressed, it can cause read error.

This is fixed by kernel commit ac0b4145d662 ("btrfs: scrub: Don't
use inode pages for device replace")

Reported-by: James Harvey <jamespharvey20@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
2018-07-01 20:35:27 +08:00
Filipe Manana 89ee377df5 btrfs: test power failure while qgroups rescan is in progress
Test that if a power failure happens on a filesystem with quotas
(qgroups) enabled while the quota rescan kernel thread is running,
we will be able to mount the filesystem after the power failure.

This test is motivated by a recent regression introduced in the
linux kernel's 4.18 merge window and is fixed by a patch with the
title:

  "Btrfs: fix mount failure when qgroup rescan is in progress"

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
2018-07-01 20:35:27 +08:00
Misono Tomohiro e1ca827f83 btrfs: Add test that checks rmdir(2) can delete a subvolume
Add btrfs test that checks "rmdir" or "rm -r" command can delete a
subvolume like an ordinary directory.

This behavior has been restricted long time but becomes allowed by
kernel commit a79a464d5675 ("btrfs: Allow rmdir(2) to delete an
empty subvolume")

The test will be skipped if kernel does not support the feature,
which can be checked whether /sys/fs/btrfs/features/rmdir_subvol
exists or not.

Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
2018-06-13 15:00:50 +08:00
Anand Jain 144c8463d3 btrfs: introduce btrfs/volume group
The btrfs/volume group represent a set of btrfs test-cases, which
shall intend to verify the relevant btrfs volume operations.

Under this new group all the existing btrfs/replace group would come
under, and also the device operations test cases which does not have
any group as of now. This group is helpful to verify the btrfs
volume related changes.

Run as
  ./check -g btrfs/volume

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
2018-06-03 22:16:15 +08:00
Anand Jain f3a33a9dda btrfs: seed device delete test
Test case to verify that a seed device can be deleted

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
2018-06-03 22:16:15 +08:00