The following scenario can occur when running btrfs/066,
Task A Task B Task C
run_test()
- Execute _btrfs_stress_subvolume()
in a background shell.
_btrfs_stress_subvolme()
...
- fork & exec "mount"
Mount subvolume on directory in $TEST_DIR
- Wait for fsstress to finish do_mount()
- kill shell process executing - btrfs_mount()
_btrfs_stress_subvolume()
i.e. Task B.
- Init process becomes the parent
of "subvolume mount" task
i.e. Task C.
- In case subvolume is mounted
(which is not the case),
unmount it.
- Complete mounting subvolume
Hence on the completion of one iteration of run_test(), the subvolume
created inside the filesystem on $SCRATCH_DEV continues to be mounted on
$TEST_DIR/$seq.mnt. Subsequent invocations of run_test() (called for
remaining Btrfs profile configs) fail during _scratch_pool_mkfs.
Instead of killing the 'subvolume stress' task this commit makes
_btrfs_stress_subvolume() to break out of the loop when a file exists
on the filesystem. The commit also makes relevant changes to other
users of _btrfs_stress_subvolume() i.e. btrfs/060, btrfs/065,
btrfs/067 & btrfs/068.
Suggested-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Run btrfs subvolume create/mount/umount/delete and btrfs scrub
operation simultaneously, with fsstress running in background.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Dave Chinner
Chandan Rajendra
Eryu Guan