In generic/019, if we hadn't install fio, we will get following output:
generic/019 [not run] utility required, skipped this test <- *
Not run: generic/019
Passed all 0 tests
When fio is not installed, "$FIO_PROG" is set to blank, and
_require_fio() call _require_command() with none arguments.
This patch fixed all misuse of _require_command(), add 2nd argument
to let _require_command() output right message, and add quotes to
first argument to avoid argument shifting.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
- expand shortened command names
- use $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG instead of 'btrfs'
- fix test 024 header number
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
_require_scratch_dev_pool() checks the devices number in
SCRATCH_DEV_POOL, but it's not enough since some btrfs RAID10 tests
needs 4 devices, but when 3 or less devices are provided, the check is
useless and related test case will fail(btrfs/003 btrfs/011 btrfs/023).
Also _require_deletable_scratch_dev_pool only checks whether it is
virtul, like virtio(not including virtio-scsi) disk will pass the check
but is unable to delete.
This patch enhance _require_scratch_dev_pool by add optional $1 as
needed device number to do extra check.
And enhance _require_deletable_scratch_dev_pool by directly check
/sys/class/block/$DEV/device/delete file.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
I've been periodically failing btrfs/003 because my box sometimes takes a little
longer to unregister the device when we remove it and so the output from btrfs
dev show doesn't match what we are wanting since it still sees the device. To
fix this just stat and sleep if we still see the device node and only continue
once udev or whatever actually removes the device node so that we don't get
random failures.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
We changed btrfs device add to check and see if there is an existing fs on the
device we are adding, so you now have to do -f if you want to do this. In order
to get around checking to see if we have this version of btrfs-progs just wipefs
the device we're adding to make sure the device add will pass no matter which
version of btrfs-progs you have. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
Since common/config is executed twice, if SCRATCH_DEV_POOL is configured
via the environment, the current code removes the first device entry twice
which means that you lose the second device for the test.
The fix is to not remove anything from SCRATCH_DEV_POOL anymore.
That used to be done (I can only guess) to allow to pass the
SCRATCH_DEV_POOL as an argument to _scratch_mkfs. Since _scratch_mkfs adds
the SCRATCH_DEV, the pool mustn't contain that device anymore.
A new function _scratch_pool_mkfs is introduced that does the expected
thing.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
This test failed for me with output from 'btrfs balance':
QA output created by 003
+Done, had to relocate 4 out of 4 chunks
+Done, had to relocate 5 out of 5 chunks
Silence is golden
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
Current numbering is inheried from the single testsuite series. There
are only 6 btrfs-specific tests and it makes more sense to start adding
new ones at a more natural place than 300-something. There's no overlap
with the old and new numbers and I hope there' will be no confusion when
referencing them.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
Zhao Lei
David Sterba
Miao Xie
Josef Bacik
Stefan Behrens