Some tests deliberately corrupt scratch devices and so will fail
the post-test check. Add a "_require_scratch_nocheck" helper
function for such tests to avoid false test failure detection.
Also, ensure that _notrun cleans up the trigger for the post-test
checks. Otherwise the next test to run may try to validate the
scratch/test devices even though they are not used by the test.
Further, _check_xfs_filesystem() causes check to exit if it finds a
corruption. This is extremely annoying as it terminates the entire
test run rather than just reporting that the test fails. Hence add
an "iam != check" test before exiting so that calls from tests will
cause the test to fail, but calls from check won't cause the harness
to exit.
There are still some tests that fail the scratch check, these are
not obvious test failures and so need further investigation to
determine the cause of the failures.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Number of helpers for checking xfs_io functionality is slowly
growing. But it's as easy to simply use _require_xfs_io_command()
directly and just specify the command we want to check. It will also
avoid the need to create helper every time we need to check a new
command in xfs_io.
Remove all the helpers and use _require_xfs_io_command() in the
tests.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Generic/311 fails when run on a test filesystem that does not
support fallocate(). Its I/O load is produced by fsync-tester,
which uses fallocate() system calls to allocate blocks for some of
its test cases. This causes EOPNOTSUPP failures when the test is
run on indirect block-mapped ext4 filesystems.
Verify that the test filesystem supports fallocate() before
proceeding with the test, checking for block allocation
capabilities. Also, fix a minor error message typo.
Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Btrfs had some issues with fsync()'ing directories and fsync()'ing
after renames. These three new tests cover the 3 different issues
we were seeing. This breaks out the dmflakey stuff into a common
helper to be shared between generic/311 and this new test.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
xfs was having issues with generic/311 because of caching issues. Make
_check_scratch_fs take an optional argument to use as the device to fsck.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
Now in tests/ there are some test cases whose mode is 0644. But they
should be 0755. So fix it.
Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
This test sets up a dm flakey target and then runs my fsync tester I've been
using to verify btrfs's fsync() is working properly. It will create a dm flakey
device, mount it, run my test, make the flakey device start dropping writes, and
then unmount the fs. Then we mount it back up and make sure the md5sums match
and then run fsck on the device to make sure we got a consistent fs. I used the
output from a run on BTRFS since it's the only one that passes this test
properly. I verified each test manually to make sure they were in fact valid
files. XFS and Ext4 both fail this test in one way or another.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
[rjohnston@sgi.com changed syncfs() to sync() for older kernels]
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
This test sets up a dm flakey target and then runs my fsync tester I've been
using to verify btrfs's fsync() is working properly. It will create a dm flakey
device, mount it, run my test, make the flakey device start dropping writes, and
then unmount the fs. Then we mount it back up and make sure the md5sums match
and then run fsck on the device to make sure we got a consistent fs. I used the
output from a run on BTRFS since it's the only one that passes this test
properly. I verified each test manually to make sure they were in fact valid
files. XFS and Ext4 both fail this test in one way or another.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
[rjohnston@sgi.com changed syncfs() to sync() for older kernels]
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
Dave Chinner
Lukas Czerner
Eric Whitney
Josef Bacik
Zheng Liu
Rich Johnston