The test shared/243 really is ext4 specific even though currently we
would run it on other file systems as well, it would not actually do any
testing.
So move it to ext4 specific directory and rename it to 002.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
There are couple of tests in shared directory which really should be
made generic, so move it. It is mostly collapse range tests, which
really can be generic to make super we test every file system which adds
collapse range support.
Here is what we're moving in this commit.
shared/001 -> generic/021
shared/002 -> generic/022
shared/003 -> generic/012
shared/004 -> generic/016
shared/005 -> generic/017
shared/218 -> generic/018
shared/305 -> generic/019
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Unmount TEST_DEV and SCRATCH_DEV after each test run to avoid
mounting multiple devices on the same mount point which might result
in xfstest not being able to unmount the device later down the path.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
When MOUNT_OPTIONS change we should remount TEST_DEV to put the changes
in effect. This will allow us to have different MOUNT_OPTIONS in sections
in configuration file.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Add config option RECREATE_TEST_DEV to allow to recreate file system on
the TEST_DEV device. Permitted values are true and false.
If RECREATE_TEST_DEV is set to true the TEST_DEV device will be
unmounted and FSTYP file system will be created on it. Afterwards it
will be mounted to TEST_DIR again with the default, or specified mount
options.
Also recreate the file system if FSTYP differs from the previous
section.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This patch add support for sections in the config file. Each section can
contain configuration options in the format
OPTION=value
when one section is processed xfstests will proceed to next section
until all secitons are processed, or an error occur.
The name of the section can consist of alphanumeric characters + '_',
nothing else is allowed. Name of the section is also used to create
results subdirectory for each section. After all the sections are
processed summary of all runs is printed out.
If the config file does not contain sections, or we're not using config
file at all, nothing is changed and xfstests will work the same way as
it used to.
This is very useful for testing file system with different options. Here
is an example of the config file with sections:
[ext4_4k_block_size]
TEST_DEV=/dev/sda
TEST_DIR=/mnt/test
SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/sdb
SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt/test1
MKFS_OPTIONS="-q -F -b4096"
FSTYP=ext4
[ext4_1k_block_size]
MKFS_OPTIONS="-q -F -b1024"
[ext4_nojournal]
MKFS_OPTIONS="-q -F -b4096 -O ^has_journal"
[ext4_discard_ssd]
MKFS_OPTIONS="-q -F -b4096"
TEST_DEV=/dev/sdc
SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/sdd
MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o discard"
Note that once the variable is set it remains set across the sections, so
you do not have to specify all the options in all sections. However one
have to make sure that unwanted options are not set from previous
sections.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This patch only adds the indentation in place so we will be able
to clearly see and review changes made in the second patch which will
add a loop (instead of always-true condition introduced in this patch)
adding support for config sections. There are no changes in the logic,
only indentation changes.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Test fs by using up all inodes and check fs.
Also a regression test for xfsprogs commit
d586858 xfs_repair: fix sibling pointer tests in verify_dir2_path()
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This is based on xfs/242. This is very similar to ext4/001 however this
test has some tweaks to make it work test zero range on generic file
system. This includes turning off ext4 extents zeroout and disabling
the test for xfs on systems where PAGE_SIZE > 4096.
It is testing extent tree manipulation with fallocate zero range
operation.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Regression test for a btrfs incremental send issue where the kernel failed
to build paths strings. This resulted either in sending a wrong path string
to the send stream or entering an infinite loop when building it.
This happened in the following scenarios:
1) A directory was made a child of another directory which has a lower inode
number and has a pending move/rename operation or there's some non-direct
ancestor directory with a higher inode number that was renamed/moved too.
This made the incremental send code go into an infinite loop when building
a path string;
2) A directory was made a child of another directory which has a higher inode
number, but the new parent wasn't moved nor renamed. Instead some other
ancestor higher in the hierarchy, with an higher inode number too, was
moved/renamed too. This made the incremental send code go into an infinite
loop when building a path string;
3) An orphan directory is created and at least one of its non-immediate
descendent directories have a pending move/rename operation. This made
an incremental send issue to the send stream an invalid path string that
didn't account for the orphan ancestor directory.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Regression test for a btrfs incremental send issue where invalid paths for
utimes, chown and chmod operations were sent to the send stream, causing
btrfs receive to fail.
If a directory had a move/rename operation delayed, and none of its parent
directories, except for the immediate one, had delayed move/rename operations,
after processing the directory's references, the incremental send code would
issue invalid paths for utimes, chown and chmod operations.
This issue is fixed by the following linux kernel btrfs patch:
Btrfs: fix send issuing outdated paths for utimes, chown and chmod
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Regression test for btrfs incremental send issue where a rmdir instruction
is sent against an orphan directory inode which is not empty yet, causing
btrfs receive to fail when it attempts to remove the directory.
This issue is fixed by the following linux kernel btrfs patch:
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This test was written before a solution was in place, I think,
and so the expected output wasn't well tested.
The test does a loop of sparse writes from 6 to 0, but the
.out file expects 6 (not 7) extents. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
On old kernel we return EINVAL if hit the limits of maximum number of
ACLs but return E2BIG on new kernel, which cause the test failes on new
kernel as the output is mismatch to the goldens. This patch fix it by
updating the golden output with the new error message and replacing the
old error message with it via a filter.
Signed-off-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Add missing test for btrfs quota groups feature,test idea is to create
a parent qgroup that groups some subvolume groups, we try to write
some data into every subvolume and then check if we exceed parent
qgroup's limit size.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This is based on xfs/242. However it's better to make it file system
specific because the range can be zeroes either directly by writing
zeroes, or converting to unwritten extent, so the actual result might
differ from file system to file system. Also xfs results differ
depending on the page size which is not the case for ext4.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This commit adds fzero operation support for fsstress, which is meant to
exercise fallocate FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE support.
Also reorganise the common fallocate code into a single do_fallocate()
function and use flags use the right mode.
Also in order to make more obvious which fallocate mode fsstress is
testing translate fallocate flags into human readable strings.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Move the inclusion of falloc.h with all it's possible defines for the
fallocate mode into global.h header file so we do not have to include
and define it manually in every tool using fallocate.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Add test for fallocate zero range at block boundary. This is similar to
the test xfs/290 however this one is generic and we're testing different
block sizes as well - namely 1k, 2k, 4k and 64k. Note that we're not
creating file systems with given block size buy rather test all 4
options.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Create new function _test_block_boundaries() which is testing content of
the blocks after the operation such as zero, or punch hole. The test is
doing the operation around block boundaries to assure correct behaviour
of the operation on block unaligned ranges.
This has been based on test xfs/290 which has been changed to use this
new function. A small change to the output file was required.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Lukas Czerner
Eryu Guan
Filipe Manana
Christoph Hellwig
Eric Sandeen
Dmitry Monakhov
Jie Liu
Wang Shilong