Add tests for overlayfs mounts with:
- Same upperdir/lowerdir
- Overlapping upperdir/lowerdir
- Overlapping lowerdir layers
- Overlapping lowerdir with other mount upperdir/workdir
Add test for moving layer into another after mount.
Overlapping layers on mount or lookup results in ELOOP.
Overlapping lowerdir with other mount upperdir/workdir
result in EBUSY.
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Some valid test cases about fsck.overlay may be not valid enough now,
they lose the impure xattr on the parent directory of the simluated
redirect directory, and lose the whiteout which use to cover the origin
lower object. Then fsck.overlay will fix these two inconsistency which
are not those test cases want to cover, thus it will lead to
fsck.overlay return FSCK_NONDESTRUCT instead of FSCK_OK. Fix these by
complement the missing overlay related features.
Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
fsck.overlay should return correct exit code to show the file system
status after fsck, instead of return 0 means consistency and !0 means
inconsistency or something bad happened.
Fix the following three exit code after running fsck.overlay:
- Return FSCK_OK if the input file system is consistent,
- Return FSCK_NONDESTRUCT if the file system inconsistent errors
corrected,
- Return FSCK_UNCORRECTED if the file system still have inconsistent
errors.
This patch also add a helper function to run fsck.overlay and check
the return value is expected or not.
[amir] rename helper to _overlay_fsck_expect, split define of FSCK_*
to a seprate path.
Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
When call _scratch_remount for cifs , it always requires to input
password. This will make generic/306 generic/452 failed because
cifs remount failed.
Signed-off-by: Xiaoli Feng <xifeng@redhat.com>
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Overlayfs might copy up data of file on first write of file (and
not necessarily upon open of file). So call falloc file opened
with O_RDWR and after that data must have been copied up.
[Eryu: add _require_xfs_io_command "falloc" to make sure underlying
fs have fallocate(2) support]
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
overlay/061 is currently the only overlay test that is expected to
fail on upstream kernel.
It is a flavor of test overlay/016 with mread in stead of pread.
The ro/rw inconsistencies related to file read()/write() API were
fixed with stacked file operations in v4.19, but the ro/rw
inconsistencies related to shared mmap read/write remain to be
fixed.
The test currently checks cache coherency between mmap read and file
write(), but this sort of cache coherency is a Linux implementation
detail not a requirement of the API.
Instead of mread vs. pwrite, check consistency of mread vs. mwrite
to shared mmap, which is required by the MMAP_SHARED API.
Because we can, perform the test on shared memory that maps files
that are already close and check also that mwrite after file is
closed is persistent. This adds test coverage for future overlayfs
writeback code.
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Extend test 064 to check security.capability xattr is not lost over
copy-up of a metadata only file. This requires mounting overlay with
option metacopy=on and first trigger metadata only copy-up and then
trigger data copy-up.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Make sure file capabilities are not lost over copy-up when file is
opened for WRITE but nothing is actually written to it.
Following commit introduced regression where if a lower file with
CAP_SETUID is opened for writing, and capability is cleared over copy up.
bd64e57586d3 ("ovl: During copy up, first copy up metadata and then data")
A later kernel patch will fix it. This test will help avoid introducing
such regressions again.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
There's a bug in the overlayfs implementation starting from the very
first merged version that may cause an Oops of various forms if a
directory is created over a whiteout dentry, but the actual whiteout
on the upper layer was removed to the directory creation.
Reported by: kaixuxia <xiakaixu1987@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
This test is for a regression that was introduced in kernel v4.17 by
commit 8b58924ad55c ("ovl: lookup in inode cache first when decoding
lower file handle").
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
overlay/016 tests two cases of ro/rw fd data inconsistecies -
one using pread and one using mmap read (i.e. mread).
The first case now passes with stacked overlay file operations
patch set merged. The second case will still fail.
By splitting the two test cases we get one regression test for
the common case of ro/rw fd data inconsistecy with pread and
one test to track the remaining non-standard behavior of
overlayfs w.r.t mmap.
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
When getfattr dumps values of all extended attributes (-d option),
it doesn't print empty extended attributes. e.g: user.name. But from
attr-2.4.48 this behavior is changed, new getfattr prints
user.name="".
The {=""} will break the golden image, so filter the redundant =""
at the end if it has.
Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Multiple origin references to the same lower file from upper files
that are not hardlinks will falsely return the same st_ino/st_dev
for two different overlay files and will cause 'diff' to falsely
report that content of files is the same when it is not.
This test checks that overlayfs detects and fails lookup of a
multiply referenced origin.
The check for multiply referenced origin was a by-product of kernel
commit 31747eda41ef ("ovl: hash directory inodes for fsnotify")
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
These tests check for constant inode number on copy up with
nonsamefs layer configuration. This problem is fixes only when
opting-in with the xino=on mount option, so let the tests enable the
mount option on new kernels and notrun on old kernels.
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
This test renames a merge directory so it needs to enable
redirect_dir feature, which is not enabled by default.
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
_overlay_check_scratch_dirs needs to base scratch fs to be mounted,
so only unmount overlay before check.
Remove redundant definition of upperdir/workdir path, which also
uses hardcoded path instead of the config vars OVL_UPPER/OVL_WORK.
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Current test expects test_lower to fail with:
truncate(test_lower) should have failed
While it is sort of okay to fail like that (the above expectation
basically acknowledges this weirdness in the overlayfs
implementation), it is by no means the only correct behavior: it is
also correct for the test to succeed (i.e. truncation fails with
ETXTBSY).
So add an option to t_truncate_self.c that allows both success and
failure, but obviously not SIGSEGV, which is what a we'd get in a
real failure mode.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Test program expects only immutable on lower layer (test failure),
but does not expect the immutable file to be on the upper layer.
The later case is actually what *should* happen, except overlayfs
didn't properly implement this case yet (but is now in the works).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
When opening a non-dir by file handle and the decoded inode/dentry
are not in cache, the resulting dentry is "disconnected" (i.e. unknown
path). This is a common case that is already covered by previous tests.
This test covers the case of decoding an overlay file handle, while a
disconnected dentry is still in cache.
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Typically, when following absolute redirect, if an opauqe dentry is
found, lookup in further lower directories is stopped. But if a child
dentry has another absolute redirect, then lookup in further lower
layers should continue.
Say, following is example setup.
upper: /redirect (redirect=/a/b/c)
lower1: /a/[b]/c ([b] is opaque) (c has absolute redirect=/a/b/d/)
lower0: /a/b/d/foo
"redirect" directory in upper should merge with lower1:/a/b/c/ and
lower0:/a/b/d/, despite lower1:/a/b/ being opaque.
This example and kernel fix has come from Amir Goldstein. I am just
putting a test for it to make sure its not broken down the line.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>