Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Zhao Lei 7a1ad744f2 common: fix "utility required warning" with empty utility name
In generic/019, if we hadn't install fio, we will get following output:

 generic/019      [not run]  utility required, skipped this test <- *
 Not run: generic/019
 Passed all 0 tests

When fio is not installed, "$FIO_PROG" is set to blank, and
_require_fio() call _require_command() with none arguments.

This patch fixed all misuse of _require_command(), add 2nd argument
to let _require_command() output right message, and add quotes to
first argument to avoid argument shifting.

Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
2015-03-18 15:00:23 +11:00
Filipe David Borba Manana 6fcbf5898c btrfs/004: fix failure with inlined file extents
Files that consist of an inline extent, have the corresponding
data in the filesystem btree and not on a dedicated extent. For
such extents filefrag (fiemap) will report a physical location
of 0 for that extent and set the 'inline' flag.

The btrfs inspect-internal logical-resolve command will cause a
lookup in the extent tree for the extent address we give it as
an argument, which fails with errno ENOENT if it is 0.

This error didn't happen always, as the test uses fsstress to
generate a random filesystem, which needed to generate at least
one file that could be inlined (content less than 4018 bytes).

Example, taken from results/btrfs/004.full:

   # filefrag -v /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1/snap1/p0/de/d1b/dcb/fb1
   Filesystem type is: 9123683e
   File size of /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1/snap1/p0/de/d1b/dcb/fb1 is 3860 (1 block of 4096 bytes)
    ext:     logical_offset:        physical_offset: length:   expected: flags:
      0:        0..    4095:          0..      4095:   4096:             not_aligned,inline,eof
      1:      280..     344:      35190..     35254:     65:          1: eof
   /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1/snap1/p0/de/d1b/dcb/fb1: 2 extents found
   after filter: 0#0#0 0#0#0
   # stat -c %i /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1/snap1/p0/de/d1b/dcb/fb1
   403
   # /home/fdmanana/git/hub/btrfs-progs/btrfs inspect-internal logical-resolve -P 0 /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1
   ioctl ret=-1, error: No such file or directory

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
2014-04-22 10:46:41 +10:00
Filipe David Borba Manana 73d944303a btrfs/004: fix filefrag filter for files with 1 block only
If the file consists of a single block, then filefrag mentions
'1 block of ...', and the filter expected 'blocks of ...'.

Example:

$ echo qwerty > foobar
$ filefrag -v foobar
Filesystem type is: ef53
File size of foobar is 7 (1 block of 4096 bytes)
 ext:     logical_offset:        physical_offset: length:   expected: flags:
   0:        0..       0:          0..         0:      1:             unknown,delalloc,eof
foobar: 1 extent found

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
2014-04-22 10:46:34 +10:00
ZhangZhen f7f9492e5c btrfs: cleanup tests 004, 007, 022 and 025
As recently suggested by Dave Chinner, make use of the new function
named _run_btrfs_util_prog() to run the btrfs util program.
Filipe David Borba Manana have cleaned up  btrfs/030 and btrfs/034.
I have done the same for the rest ones.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Zhen <zhenzhang.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
2014-03-13 15:17:44 +11:00
Wang Shilong 617252fc09 btrfs/004: fix to make test really work
So I was wondering why test 004 could pass my previous wrong
kernel patch while it defenitely should not.

By some debugging, i found here perl script is wrong, we did not
filter out anything and this unit test did not work acutally.so
it came out we will never fail this test.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
2014-02-18 21:18:16 +11:00
David Sterba 1ed9046c3f xfstests: clean command names in btrfs tests
- expand shortened command names
- use $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG instead of 'btrfs'
- fix test 024 header number

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
2014-01-24 12:06:14 +11:00
David Sterba aab6d4e47d xfstests: renumber existing btrfs tests to start with 1
Current numbering is inheried from the single testsuite series. There
are only 6 btrfs-specific tests and it makes more sense to start adding
new ones at a more natural place than 300-something. There's no overlap
with the old and new numbers and I hope there' will be no confusion when
referencing them.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
2013-08-13 16:16:27 -05:00