Last night I had xfstests running and after a while it hung at
shared/032 because I had reiser4progs installed and it was waiting
for input:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
mkfs -t reiser4 /dev/ram0
mkfs.reiser4 1.2.1
Format release: 4.0.2
Copyright (C) 2001-2005 by Hans Reiser, licensing governed by
reiser4progs/COPYING.
Block size 4096 will be used.
Linux 5.5.0-rc5-amd64 is detected.
Uuid 2006a590-832a-49f5-9317-cf91bf866dd7 will be used.
Reiser4 is going to be created on /dev/ram0.
(Yes/No):
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The patch below adds an option (cf. reiserfs the line above) so that
the test continues.
Curiously enough the test still "succeeds" for reiser{fs,4} (and jfs
too) because the userspace tools don't appear to have a routine to
check for "contains an existing filesystem", but that could be
addressed in a different patch.
Signed-off-by: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Calling src/<file> without path '$here' may cause the problem that
the file cannot be found.
For example, Running generic/192 with overlayfs(Let ubifs as base
fs) yields the following output:
generic/192 - output mismatch
QA output created by 192
sleep for 5 seconds
test
+./common/rc: line 316: src/t_dir_type: No such file or directory
delta1 is in range
delta2 is in range
...
When the use case fails, the call stack in generic/192 is:
local unknowns=$(src/t_dir_type $dir u | wc -l) common/rc
_supports_filetype common/rc
_overlay_mount common/overlay
_overlay_test_mount common/overlay
_test_mount common/rc
_test_cycle_mount generic/192
Before _test_cycle_mount() being invoked, generic/192 executed 'cd
/' to change work dir from 'xfstests-dev' to '/', so src/t_dir_type
was not found.
[Eryu: some tests run src/<file> as regular user, don't add $here
prefix in such case, as a regular user may have no search permission
on $here]
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Now that we run the test for all block device based file systems, there
is no reason to keep it out of generic.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Cgroupv2 writeback support can't be easily detected. But it is
kindof expected from block based file systems and can be easily
added, so just assume support and fail if it doesn't work.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Add _require_scratch_duperemove which validates that the file system
supports duperemove. This allows us to move three tests from shared/
to generic/. This means these tests will automatically adapt when
duperemove supports other file systems. Tests moved are:
shared/008 --> generic/559
shared/009 --> generic/560
shared/010 --> generic/561
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
The shared/006 uses _scratch_mkfs_sized to create a limited size
file system, and then creates inodes until it gets ENOSPC, and then
checks to make sure the file system is consistent. It then remounts
the file system, removes all of the files, and makes sure the file
system is consistent afterwards. This test was marked as only being
supported on ext[234] and xfs, and so it was in shared.
Now introduce a new _require_inode_limits() rule to run test on
filesystems that have a fixed inode number, then move the test to
generic.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
The tests shared/{001,003,004,272} test behaviour around the ext4's
journal. As such, they are pointless to run on ext2, and ext3 no
longer is in kernels newer than 4.3. (And most enterprise
distributions have been using ext4 to support the ext3 file system;
that capability has been around since 2.6.33.) So we can move these
tests out of shared and into the ext4 class of tests:
shared/001 --> ext4/036
shared/003 --> ext4/037
shared/004 --> ext4/038
shared/272 --> ext4/039
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
This test does some weird things with live filesystems -- it seems to be
validating the behavior of fstrim by comparing the filesystem's free
space map to holes in the file image that backs the filesystem.
However, this doesn't account for the fact that some filesystems
maintain in-core preallocations and/or can perturb the free space data
during unmount. This causes sporadic test failures when the two become
out of sync.
Therefore, make sure we unmount the filesystem before we start running
tools against the filesystem image file to eliminate the possibility of
changes to the free space map. This was found by running shared/298 on
xfs with a 1k block size.
cc: enwlinux@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Add support for btrfs in shared/298. Achieve this by introducing 2
new awk scripts that parse relevant btrfs structures and print holes.
Additionally modify the test to create larger - 3gb filesystem in the
case of btrfs. This is needed so that distinct block groups are used
for data and metadata.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
A test to perform reads/writes under various cgroups and verify that
I/Os are accounted properly according to cgroup aware writeback.
This is a generic test, but not all commonly used local filesystems
support cgroup aware writeback at the moment (i.e., XFS). Therefore,
this test currently requires ext4 or btrfs for the time being.
The common/cgroup2 file is copied from a separate cgroup related
patch from Shaohua Li that never made it upstream.
Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Some tests that use dmflakey to test filesystem consistency after a power
failure are in the 'log' group while others are not. So fix the
incosistency and put them all under the 'log' group.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
When test on large fs (--large-fs), xfstests preallocates a large
file in SCRATCH_MNT/ at first. Duperemove will take too long time
to deal with that large file (many days on 500T XFS). So move
working directory to a sub-dir underlying $SCRATCH_MNT/.
Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
When getfattr dumps values of all extended attributes (-d option),
it doesn't print empty extended attributes. e.g: user.name. But from
attr-2.4.48 this behavior is changed, new getfattr prints
user.name="".
The {=""} will break the golden image, so filter the redundant =""
at the end if it has.
Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Run several duperemove processes with fsstress on same directory at
same time. Make sure the race won't break the fs or kernel.
Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
This case does dedupe on a dir, then copy the dir to next dir.
Dedupe the next dir again, then copy this dir to next again, and
dedupe again ... At the end, verify the data in the last dir is
still same with the first one.
Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Duperemove is a tool for finding duplicated extents and submitting
them for deduplication, and it supports XFS. This case trys to
verify the integrity of XFS after running duperemove.
Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Abstract calls to xfs_info into $XFS_INFO_PROG like we do for all
other xfs utilities.
[Eryu: require xfs_info to be present if FSTYP is xfs]
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Previously _scratch_mount didn't check the mount status and most
tests continue to run even if the mount failed (unless test checks
for the mount status explicitly). This would result in running tests
on the underlying filesystem (usually rootfs) and implicit test
failures, and such failures can be annoying and are usually hard to
debug.
Now _fail test by default if _scratch_mount failed and introduce
_try_scratch_mount for tests that need to check mount results
themselves.
Suggested-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
shared/272 fails with kernels v4.15-rc1 and beyond when you are
mounted with DAX:
shared/272 [failed, exit status 1] - output mismatch (see
/root/project/xfstests/results//shared/272.out.bad)
--- tests/shared/272.out 2015-12-05 13:12:17.038257578 -0700
+++ /root/project/xfstests/results//shared/272.out.bad 2018-01-17
15:37:18.581631116 -0700
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
QA output created by 272
Switch data journalling mode. Silence is golden.
-Check filesystem
+/usr/bin/chattr: Device or resource busy while setting flags on
/mnt/xfstests_scratch/file.1
...
(Run 'diff -u tests/shared/272.out
/root/project/xfstests/results//shared/272.out.bad' to see the entire
diff)
This is expected. The following kernel commit:
commit e9072d859df3 ("ext4: prevent data corruption with journaling + DAX")
makes "chattr +j", which is attempting to turn on data journaling,
return -EBUSY if the ext4 DAX mount option is in use. This was done
to prevent the data corruption shown in xfstest ext4/030, added by
this xfstests commit:
commit 750a24e99e ("ext4: test for DAX + journaling corruption")
So, just skip shared/272 if the DAX mount option is in use.
Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
This is obviously wrong and makes ./check -r skip over tests on ext4
with "ext4 on $DEV not configured with metadata journaling".
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
The ACL test shared/051 was very similar to generic/099 which was not
being run and was just removed; most likely the script was copy+pasted
at some point. Since shared/051 has been getting maintained+run and is
not really XFS and UDF-specific, move it to generic, reusing the old
number of 099. One change was required for it to work on other
filesystems: the output of 'find' must be sorted.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
If the kernel bug has been fixed, stat command fails to get i_size
and reports "Structure needs cleaning". So we use debugfs -R "stat"
instead of stat command to make sure debugfs sets negative i_size.
These cases have been broken by commit 0e13e40b24 ("shared/005,7:
make sure debugfs sets negative i_size").
Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
shared/005 and shared/007 work abnornamlly on RHEL6.8GA and
RHEL6.9Beta because debugfs fails to set i_size to -1 or -512
and reports "exceeds field size maximum". When debugfs fails
to set a negative i_size, we can skip these cases which don't
trigger the kernel bug.
Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>