I added some new operatoins to fsstress, and it changed the total
number of test operstions.
xfs/068 use a fixed seed (-s) and number of operations (-n) to run
fsstress, to get fixed number of files and directories. Due to my
patches break these fixed things, so update its expected result in
golden image.
Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
xfs/068 use a fixed seed (-s) and number of operations (-n) to run
fsstress, to get fixed number of files and directories. But new
operations of fsstress will break this "fixed number". So update
it, after fsstress get new operations.
Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Oh my, I did a very bad thing - I wrote a new test to
check for xfsdump regressions, but did not create the
.out file with a known-good kernel.
This matches output from older, stable kernels, and is the
proper expected output. Sorry about that!
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This test creates a large-ish directory structure using
fsstress, and does a dump/restore to make sure we dump
all the files.
Without the fix for the regression caused by:
c7cb51d xfs: fix error handling at xfs_inumbers
we will see failures like:
-xfsrestore: 486 directories and 1590 entries processed
+xfsrestore: 30 directories and 227 entries processed
as it fails to process all inodes.
I think that existing tests have a much smaller set of files,
and so don't trip the bug.
I don't do a file-by-file comparison here, because for some
reason the diff output gets garbled; this test only checks
that we've dumped & restored the correct number of files.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Zorro Lang
Eric Sandeen