Finishing xfs/132 left a shutdown scratch fs and the test harness
didn't unmount the fs(because we told it not to check the fs) so the
test harness called by subsequent xfs/133 tried to "test -d
$SCRATCH_MNT" and received the IO error from the dead fs.
i.e. Running xfs/132 and xfs/133 together got the following error:
------------------------------------------------------------
...
xfs/132 1s ... 1s
xfs/133 1s ... [failed, exit status 1] - output mismatch (see /var/lib/xfstests/results//xfs/133.out.bad)
...
QA output created by 133
-Format and mount
-Corrupt filesystem
-Remount, try to append
-Write did not succeed (ok).
+SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/sda11 is mounted but not on SCRATCH_MNT=common/config: - aborting
+Already mounted result:
+/dev/sda11 /mnt/xfstests/scratch
...
------------------------------------------------------------
Even if we don't check fs, the test harness is supposed to unmount
fs and return an initial state before running the next test.
Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Swap files cannot have holes, and they must at least two pages.
swapon(8) and mkswap(8) have stricter restrictions, so add versions
of those commands without any restrictions.
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Similar to generic/356 that makes sure we can't dedupe an active
swapfile.
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Commit 8c96cfbfe5 ("generic/35[67]: disable swapfile tests on
Btrfs") disabled the swapfile tests on Btrfs because it did not
support swapfiles at the time. Now that we're adding support, we
want these tests to run, but they don't. _require_scratch_swapfile
always fails for Btrfs because swapfiles on Btrfs must be set to
nocow. After fixing that, generic/356 and generic/357 fail for the
same reason. After fixing _that_, both tests still fail because we
don't allow reflinking a non-checksummed extent (which nocow
implies) to a checksummed extent.
Add a helper for formatting a swap file which does the chattr, and
chattr the second file, which gets these tests running on kernels
supporting Btrfs swapfiles.
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
I'm going to add a bunch of tests for swap files, so create a group
for them and add the existing tests.
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
The comment about the dmerror switcheroo is hard to understand and
wrong. Fix both problems by rewriting it.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
generic/490 fails because cleanup tries to delete . and .. since $tmp
is left unset, and so "rm -f $tmp.*" does nothing useful. Instead
define $tmp and delete temp files created by seek_sanity_test.
[Eryu: define $tmp and remove $tmp.* too on cleanup]
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
The golden image of some cases (e.g: generic/305 generic/326
generic/327 generic/328 xfs/214 xfs/330 and xfs/440) depend on the
output of repquota() function.
When it reports multi-users, we can't control the order of lines,
then always hit failures likes:
...
Create the original files
-root 3072 0 0
nobody 0 0 0
fsgqa 0 0 0
+root 3072 0 0
...
So sort the lines to make sure it won't break the golden image.
Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
From Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>:
"From earlier discussions, In between errors of a direct I/O cannot
be handled correctly and may need a lot of tracking that it is not
worth performing.
It would be better to drop this test case and add in the documentation
that a direct I/O error could mean that the write() may or may not have
occurred and underlying data may be inconsistent."
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Currently the only test in group 'thin' is 347. On some recent
kernels tests that use dm-thin causing kernel crashes, so it's useful
to be able to be exclude all tests that use dm-thin.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Control characters (such as backspace, used in progress reports by
mkfs.ext4, for example) can make Python's XML parsers choke, claiming
that it is an invalid XML document.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Add proper requires for getcap and setcap tools to tests that need
them. Also define standard variables GETCAP_PROG and SETCAP_PROG.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
This tests the online label ioctl that btrfs has, which has been
recently proposed for XFS.
To run, it requires an updated xfs_io with the label command and a
filesystem that supports it
A slight change here to _require_xfs_io_command as well, so that
tests which simply fail with "Inappropriate ioctl" can be caught in
the common case.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
_qmount_options didn't properly replace ext[34] journalled quotas
mount options. As such the mount option string got garbled and the
test (e.g. generic/379) failed.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Project quota can work for ext2 & ext3 the same way as for ext4.
Handle them properly as currently the tests just fail because of
unknown prjquota mount option. After this patch, tests will be "not
run" because ext4 driver refuses to use project quota mount options
for "old" fs types.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
With ext4, this leads to freeze proection bypass WARN_ON in
ext4_journal_check_start.
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
ext4 had a bug for files with indirect extents where it wrongly
reported a size of a hole in some cases and thus SEEK_DATA
implementation could skip some data in a file. Test for that. The
problem is fixed by patch "ext4: Fix hole length detection in
ext4_ind_map_blocks()".
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Test that xattrs are not lost after calling fsync multiple times
with a filesystem commit in between the fsync calls.
This test is motivated by a bug found in btrfs which is fixed by a
patch for the linux kernel titled:
Btrfs: fix xattr loss after power failure
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Test case for superblock shrinkers running while the filesystem is
being set up and/or torn down and tripping over inconsistent state.
Signed-Off-By: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Btrfs has a bug where we can prematurely ENOSPC if we have lots of
orphaned files, i.e., deleted files which are still open. Add a test
which repeatedly creates and deletes a file while keeping all of the
file descriptors open. This should succeed but doesn't on Btrfs
without the fix.
[Eryu: use multi_open_unlink command to keep files open & unlinked
instead of shell scripts]
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
When test on large SCRATCH_DEV, growing a small XFS to huge size is
a horrible thing (e.g grow 128M to 500T) and it doesn't add any more
test coverage. So skip this kind of tests if LARGE_SCRATCH_DEV is
yes.
Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Xiao Yang
Omar Sandoval
Darrick J. Wong
Theodore Ts'o
Zorro Lang
Jan Kara
Eric Sandeen
Amir Goldstein
Filipe Manana
Dave Chinner