As recently suggested by Dave Chinner, make use of the new function
named _run_btrfs_util_prog() to run the btrfs util program.
Filipe David Borba Manana have cleaned up btrfs/030 and btrfs/034.
I have done the same for the rest ones.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Zhen <zhenzhang.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Make the test btrfs/025 not depend on the output of the btrfs tools
subvolume, send, receive and filesystem commands output. The output
of these commands has changed several times in the past, and it can
change again in the future. Therefore just test for failure/success
and not for the exact output on the success case.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
- expand shortened command names
- use $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG instead of 'btrfs'
- fix test 024 header number
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Test for an issue in btrfs send where it sent clone operations to user
space with a range (offset + length) that was not aligned with the block
size. This caused the btrfs receive command to send such clone operations
to the ioctl clone API, which would return -EINVAL errors to btrfs receive,
causing the receive command to abort immediately.
This corresponding btrfs linux kernel patch that fixes this issue is at:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3470401/
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
ZhangZhen
Filipe David Borba Manana
David Sterba