The first line of generic/563.out is wrong, the number should be
563, not 011. This mismatch will always cause testing fail.
Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
We did not consistently remove trailing dot from umount output which
can presumably lead to false failures with particular versions of
util-linux. Make sure all umount output is properly filtered.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Instead of faking output for the case of XFS with quotas, just use a
different output file with appropriate output.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
The test gives false failure on ext2 filesystem as 64k file already
has indirect block and so space usage does not exactly match
expectation.
The test really needs to verify only whether quota accounting got
reenabled so just test using creating another empty file which is
not prone to these problems.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Test generic/382 depends on filesystem allocating exactly 30M of blocks
when writing 30M file. This is not true for some filesystems - e.g. for
ext2 due to indirect blocks - while leads to false positive failures.
In this case, the test is not actually interested in comparing exact
usage, rather in verifying the ability to write 30M worth of data. So
instead of comparing 'xfs_quota report' output, just depend on detecting
error when writing files.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Filesystems without journal can happily mount unrecovered filesystem
read-only which confuses this test. Handle this by providing
different expected output for filesystems without journal.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Verify that both full and incremental send operations can issue
clone operations when a file has extents that are shared with itself
(at different offsets of course).
This currently fails on btrfs but is addressed by a patch for the
kernel titled:
"Btrfs: send, allow clone operations within the same file"
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Making many small holes in 10M test file seems not very
helpful for test coverage and it takes too much time on
creating test files. In order to improve test speed we
adjust test file size to (10 * iosize) for iosize aligned
hole files and meanwhile add more test patterns for small
random holes and small empty file.
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@mykernel.net>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
With a recent change to xfs_io[1], the fsxattr.xflags output line
has added another flag column, so xfs/207 starts failing.
Rather than testing for an exact set of flags, test whether the
specific flag we are interested in is set or unset.
[1] xfs_io/lsattr: expose FS_XFLAG_HASATTR flag
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bill O'Donnell <billodo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
generic/317 will fail because execvp(cmd) is executed without permission,
where cmd is '$here/src/lstat64 $file', which is called by
$here/src/nsexec -s -U -M "0 $qa_user_id 1000" -G "0 $qa_user_id 1000"\
$here/src/lstat64 $file
So, you will see following output:
From user_ns
...
+execvp: Permission denied
nsexec runs the instruction '$here/src/lstat64 $file' as a regular user,
the regular user may not have permission to access path in '$here'.
Actually, it has been fixed in 4818302fbf ("xfstests: generic/317 use
relative paths..."), which then been modified by b7cecbea22 ("fstests:
Add path $here before src/<file>").
Fixes: b7cecbea22 ("fstests: Add path $here before src/<file>")
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
There are some testcases use below two kind of commands to get file
size, generalize the second way as global function _get_filesize()
to simply codes.
1. ls -l $1 | $AWK_PROG '{print $5}'
2. stat -c %s $1
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Most of the fs-verity tests fail if the fs.verity.require_signatures
sysctl has been set to 1. Update them to set this sysctl to 0 at the
beginning of the test and restore it to its previous value at the end.
generic/577 intentionally sets this sysctl to 1. Make it restore the
previous value at the end of the test rather than assuming it was 0.
Also simplify _require_fsverity_builtin_signatures() to just check for
the presence of the file /proc/sys/fs/verity/require_signatures rather
than check whether the fs-verity keyring is listed in /proc/keys.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
There is ABBA deadlock bug in XFS between the AGI and AGF when
performing rename() with RENAME_WHITEOUT flag, and add this testcase
to make sure the rename() call works well.
Though this is a xfs-specific bug, the reproducer has no
xfs-specific part.
Signed-off-by: kaixuxia <kaixuxia@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Verify ciphertext for v2 encryption policies that use Adiantum to
encrypt file contents and file names.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Verify ciphertext for v2 encryption policies that use AES-128-CBC-ESSIV
to encrypt file contents and AES-128-CTS-CBC to encrypt file names.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Verify ciphertext for v2 encryption policies that use AES-256-XTS to
encrypt file contents and AES-256-CTS-CBC to encrypt file names.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Test non-root use of the fscrypt filesystem-level encryption keyring and
v2 encryption policies.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Add a basic test of the fscrypt filesystem-level encryption keyring and
v2 encryption policies.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Rename the helper functions that add/remove keys from the session
keyring, in order to distinguish them from the helper functions I'll
be adding to add/remove keys from the new filesystem-level keyring.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Add a stress test for fs-verity. This tests enabling fs-verity on
multiple files concurrently with concurrent readers on those files
(with reads occurring before, during, and after the fs-verity
enablement), while fsstress is also running on the same filesystem.
I haven't seen any failures from running this on ext4 and f2fs.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
The test case checks if btrfs can trim adjacent extents across
adjacent block groups boundary correctly.
The test case craft the following extents layout:
| BG1 | BG2 | BG3 |
Bytenr: X-8M X X+512M X+1G X+1G+128M
|//////|//////| | |//|
There is a long existing bug that, when btrfs is trying to trim the
range at [X+512M, X+1G+128M), it will only trim [X+512M, X+1G).
This test case is the regression test for this long existing bug.
It will verify the trimmed bytes by using loopback device backed up
by a file, and checking the bytes used by the file to determine how
many bytes are trimmed.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
xfsprogs prior to commit 2f9a125c3a39 ("xfsprogs: replace
pread64/pwrite64 by equivalent pread/pwrite") will see "pwrite64:
Text file busy" error. Just filter these "pwrite64"s to "pwrite"
with _filter_xfs_io_error.
Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Test if btrfs.ko sucessfully identifies and reports the missing
device, if the missed device contians no btrfs magic string.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Test if btrfs.ko sucessfully identifies and reports the missing
device, if the missed device contians someother btrfs.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Zorro Lang
Jan Kara
Filipe Manana
Chengguang Xu
Eric Sandeen
Darrick J. Wong
Zhihao Cheng
Chao Yu
Eric Biggers
kaixuxia
Qu Wenruo
Yang Xu
Anand Jain