The mount options uqnoenforce and qnoenforce no longer cause 'usrquota'
to be emitted in /proc/mounts, so there is a regression in xfs/513. Fix
it by using proper output option uqnoenforce.
You'll need kernel commit 237d7887ae72 ("xfs: show the proper user
quota options") to pass the test.
[Eryu: add kernel commit info in commit log]
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
fstests only supports Linux, so get rid of this unnecessary predicate.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
The minimum accepted allocsize mount option value is page size, which
causes the particular test to fail in architectures where page size >
block size. Fix it by basing the value on the platform page size rather
than the block size as obtained from mkfs. In addition add a filter so
that different values can be used without breaking the golden output.
Signed-off-by: Anthony Iliopoulos <ailiopoulos@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
XFS is changing to suit the new mount API, so add this case to make
sure the changing won't bring in regression issue on xfs mount
option parse phase, and won't change some default behaviors either.
Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Kaixu Xia
Darrick J. Wong
Anthony Iliopoulos
Zorro Lang