When I run xfs/191 with upstream xfsprogs, I get the following
errors because mkfs.xfs binary has changed a lot(use loop device
to avoid stripe alignment affect).
-------------------------
pass -n size=2b /dev/loop0
pass -d agsize=8192b /dev/loop0
pass -d agsize=65536s /dev/loop0
pass -d su=0,sw=64 /dev/loop0
pass -d su=4096s,sw=64 /dev/loop0
pass -d su=4096b,sw=64 /dev/loop0
pass -l su=10b /dev/loop0
fail -n log=15 /dev/loop0
fail -r rtdev=/mnt/xfstests/test/191-input-validation.img /dev/loop0
fail -r size=65536,rtdev=/mnt/xfstests/test/191-input-validation.img /dev/loop0
fail -i log=10 /dev/loop
--------------------------
"pass -d su=0,sw=64 /dev/loop0", expect fail, this behavior has been
fixed by commit 16adcb88(mkfs: more sunit/swidth sanity checking).
"fail -n log=15 /dev/sda11" "fail -i log=10 /dev/sda11", expect pass,
this option has been removed since commit 2cf637c(mkfs: remove
logarithm based CLI option).
"fail -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg /dev/sda11" "fail -r rtdev=$fsimg
/dev/sda11" works well if we disable reflink, fail if we enable
reflink. It fails because reflink was not supported in realtime
devices since commit bfa66ec(mkfs: don't create realtime filesystems
with reflink enabled).
Since xfsprogs v4.15.0-rc1(commit 68344ba0f mkfs: introduce default
configuration structure), we have deault sectorsize and blocksize.
So some cases without 's' or 'b' suffix trun into pass.
Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
The minimum accepted allocsize mount option value is page size, which
causes the particular test to fail in architectures where page size >
block size. Fix it by basing the value on the platform page size rather
than the block size as obtained from mkfs. In addition add a filter so
that different values can be used without breaking the golden output.
Signed-off-by: Anthony Iliopoulos <ailiopoulos@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Create a helper to run xfs_admin on the scratch device, then
refactor all tests to use it.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
The test currently assumes a file system block size of 4k. It will
work just fine on any user-specified block size, though.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
A handful of minor changes went into xfs_repair output in the
last push, so add a few more filters and change the resulting
expected output.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
This allows us to run all those tests which simulate disk failures
using dmerror.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
When I test this case(default lsunit 256k), this case will fail,
as below:
cycle: 1 version: 2 lsn: 1,0 tail_lsn: 1,0
length of Log Record: 258048 prev offset: -1 num ops: 1
...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
extended-header: cycle: 1
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
...
It reports this info because xfs_logprint only read 32k header every time, so it
needs to read more times. We can filter this useless info.
common/log also has _filter_logprint function. only library function is
prefixed with "_", remove '_'.
Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
XFS is changing to suit the new mount API, so add this case to make
sure the changing won't bring in regression issue on xfs mount
option parse phase, and won't change some default behaviors either.
Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
`seq X Y` will print all numbers between X and Y, including Y. Since
inode chunks contain inodes numbered from X to X+63, we need to set the
loop variables correctly.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
If we can't create the 60T sparse image for testing repair on a large fs
(such as when running on 32-bit), don't bother running the rest of the
test. This requires the actual truncate(1) command, because it returns
nonzero if the system call fails.
[Eryu: the original bug was introduced by me when committing the
original patch, which was a correct fix. Sorry about that.. ]
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
xfsprogs 5.4 prints "Discarding..." if the disk supports the trim
command. Filter this out of the output because xfs_info and friends
won't print that out.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
If we can't create the 60T sparse image for testing repair on a large fs
(such as when running on 32-bit), don't bother running the rest of the
test.
[Eryu: use xfs_io instead of truncate]
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Due to the unique structure of xfs/279 running _get_scsi_debug_dev from
a backtick from inside subshell, the "could not get scsi_debug device"
checks do not actually stop the test when modprobe scsi_debug fails.
Therefore, check the value of SCSI_DEBUG_DEV from the subshell and
_notrun the test if we couldn't get memory.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Skip this test we can't create the large sparse file needed to test
overflows.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Add disk dquot structures to the check list now that we killed the
typedef.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Test that removing the SGI_ACL_FILE attr also removes the cached ACL
used for access control checking.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
The ability to use a mounted device node as the primary argument
to xfs_growfs was added back in with:
7e8275f8 xfs_growfs: allow mounted device node as argument
because it was an undocumented behavior that some userspace depended on.
This test exercises that functionality.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
This reverts commit 37520a314b.
This commit has been reported to regress, at least, xfs/139 and
btrfs/09[58]. Let's revert it for now.
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Yang Xu reported a test failure in xfs/148 that I think comes from
extended attributes being returned in a different order than they were
set. Since order isn't important in this test, sort the output to make
it consistent.
Reported-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.ky@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
After this test is passed, checking filesystems will execute. Then
xfs_logprint will be failed and xfs_repair will take a long time
because there is not really creating the file system in this test
and wipefs executes before this test. So there is no need checking
filesystems.
Signed-off-by: Baihua Lu <lubaihua0331@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
With a recent change to xfs_io[1], the fsxattr.xflags output line
has added another flag column, so xfs/207 starts failing.
Rather than testing for an exact set of flags, test whether the
specific flag we are interested in is set or unset.
[1] xfs_io/lsattr: expose FS_XFLAG_HASATTR flag
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bill O'Donnell <billodo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Yang Xu
Anthony Iliopoulos
Darrick J. Wong
Jeff Moyer
Eric Sandeen
Theodore Ts'o
Zorro Lang
Christoph Hellwig
Eryu Guan
Kusanagi Kouichi
Baihua Lu