Test file A fsync after moving one other unrelated file B between
directories and fsyncing B's old parent directory before fsyncing
the file A. Check that after a crash all the file A data we fsynced
is available.
This test is motivated by an issue discovered in btrfs which caused
the file data to be lost (despite fsync returning success to user
space). That btrfs bug is fixed by the following linux kernel patch:
Btrfs: fix data loss in the fast fsync path
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This case tests truncate/collapse range race. If the race occurs, it
will trigger a BUG_ON(). And this kernel patch has fixed this race:
23fffa9 fs: move falloc collapse range check into the filesystem methods
Signed-off-by: Xiaoguang Wang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Xing Gu <gux.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
There're six test cases:
- mount at a nonexistent mount point
- mount a free loop device
- mount with a wrong fs type
- umount an symlink to device which is not mounted
- umount a path with too long name
- lazy umount a symlink
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Test extent pre-allocation (using fallocate) into a region that already has a
pre-allocated extent that ends beyond the file's size. Verify that if the fs
is unmounted immediately after, the file's size and content are not lost.
This is motivated by a minor issue found in btrfs where the second fallocate
wouldn't update the inode's i_size on disk, fixed by the following btrfs
patch: "Btrfs: add missing inode item update in fallocate()".
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
mkdir fails due to ENOSPC occasionally and will fail the whole test.
Redirect stdout and stderr to /dev/null.
Also fix the code style in _cleanup to use single tab.
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Explicitly fsync the file named 'hello' before checking its content.
This way there's only one expected result for all filesystems.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
There is no API documentation for RENAME_WHITEOUT. There is no
developer documentation for RENAME_WHITEOUT. There are not comments
in the overlayfs or ext4 implementation of RENAME_WHITEOUT.
Hence, this test simply tries to expose basic RENAME_WHITEOUT
behaviour from ext4 so we can reverse-engineer and verify
bug-for-bug renameat2(RENAME_WHITEOUT) ext4 compatibility.
Note: uses generic/078 just to keep out of the way of the 6-7 other
pending new tests.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This test is motivated by an fsync issue discovered in btrfs.
The issue was that the fsync log replay code did not remove xattrs that
were deleted before the inode was fsynced. The result was unexpected
and differed from xfs and ext3/4 for example.
The btrfs issue was fixed by the following linux kernel patch:
Btrfs: remove deleted xattrs on fsync log replay
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This test is motivated by an fsync issue discovered in btrfs.
The issue was that after adding a new hard link to an existing file
(one that was created in a past transaction) and fsync'ing the parent
directory of the new hard link, after the fsync log replay the file's
inode link count did not get its link count incremented, while the new
directory entry was visible.
Also, unlike xfs and ext4, new files under the directory we fsync were
not being written to the fsync log, nor were any child directories and
new files and links under the children directories. So this test verifies
too that btrfs has the same behaviour as xfs and ext4.
The btrfs issue was fixed by the following linux kernel patch:
Btrfs: fix metadata inconsistencies after directory fsync
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Many tests use dm_flakey to trigger log replay, but for filesystems that
don't support metadata journaling, this causes failures when it shouldn't.
(i.e. we can hardly test log replay if there is no log, and the subsequent
filesystem check will turn up errors).
For some tests they actually sync everything we care about, and find
inconsistencies elsewhere, but I erred on the side of simply not running
the test in most cases.
Tested-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
The test case passes 32K as the offset value to msync. This fails on machines
with 64K page size. Fix this by creating a larger file and passing offset
values which are multiples of 64K.
Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This testcase tests various corner cases with delayed extents and
pre-existing holes for finsert range functionality over different
types of extents.
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This testcase tests various corner cases with pre-existing holes
for finsert range functionality over different type of extents.
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This testcase tests various corner cases with delayed extents
for finsert range functionality over different type of extents.
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This test is motivated by an fsync issue discovered in btrfs.
The issue was that after punching a hole for a small range, which
affected only a partial page, an fsync operation would have no effect
at all. This was because for this particular case the btrfs hole
punching implementation did not update some btrfs specific inode
metadata that is required to determine if an fsync operation needs
to update the fsync log. For this to happen, it was also necessary
that in the transaction where the hole punching was performed, and
before the fsync operation, no other operation that modified the file
(or its metadata) was performed.
The btrfs issue was fixed by the following linux kernel patch:
Btrfs: add missing inode update when punching hole
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This test is motivated by an fsync issue discovered in btrfs.
The issue was that we could lose file data, that was previously
fsync'ed successfully, if we end up adding a hard link to our
inode and then persist the fsync log later via an fsync of other
inode for example. This is similar to my previous test, except
that in this test the inode that ends up losing data was created
(with some data) in a transaction different from the one we made
an fsync.
The btrfs issue was fixed by the following linux kernel patch:
Btrfs: fix fsync data loss after adding hard link to inode
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This test is motivated by an fsync issue discovered in btrfs.
The issue was that we could lose file data, that was previously
fsync'ed successfully, if we end up adding a hard link to our
inode and then persist the fsync log later via an fsync of other
inode for example.
The btrfs issue was fixed by the following linux kernel patch:
Btrfs: fix fsync data loss after adding hard link to inode
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This patch moves the generic testcases defined in xfs into tests/generic/.
xfs/085 -> generic/052
xfs/086 -> generic/054
xfs/087 -> generic/055
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This test is motivated by an fsync issue discovered in btrfs.
The steps to trigger the issue were:
1) remove an hard link from an inode with a large number of hard links;
2) add a new hard link;
3) add another hard link with the same name as the one removed in step 1;
4) fsync the inode.
These steps made the btrfs fsync log replay fail (with the -EOVERFLOW
error), making the filesystem unmountable, requiring the use of
btrfs-zero-log (it wipes the fsync log) in order to make the filesystem
mountable again (but losing some data/metadata).
The btrfs issue was fixed by the following linux kernel patches:
Btrfs: fix fsync when extend references are added to an inode
Btrfs: fix fsync log replay for inodes with a mix of regular refs and extrefs
This issue was present in btrfs since the extrefs (extend references)
feature was added (2012).
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This test is motivated by an fsync issue discovered in btrfs.
The issue in btrfs was that adding a new hard link to an inode that
already had a large number of hardlinks and fsync the inode, would
make the fsync log replay code update the inode with a wrong link count
(smaller than the correct value). This resulted later in dangling
directory index entries, after removing most of the hard links
(correct_value - wrong_value), that were visible to user space but it
was impossible to delete them or do any other operation on them (since
they pointed to an inode that didn't exist anymore, resulting in -ESTALE
errors).
The btrfs issue was fixed by the following linux kernel patch:
Btrfs: fix fsync when extend references are added to an inode
This issue was present in btrfs since the extrefs (extend references)
feature was added (2012).
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This test is motivated by an fsync issue discovered in btrfs.
The issue was that after fsyncing an inode that got its link count
decremented, and the new link count is greater than zero, after the
fsync log replay the inode's parent directory metadata became
inconsistent - it had a wrong i_size and dangling index entries which
prevented the directory from ever being removed (rmdir always failed
with -ENOTEMPTY, even if the directory had no more child inodes).
The btrfs issue was fixed by the following linux kernel patch:
Btrfs: fix directory inconsistency after fsync log replay
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Filipe Manana
Xiaoguang Wang
Eryu Guan
Dave Chinner
Eric Sandeen
Chandan Rajendra
Namjae Jeon
Jaegeuk Kim