A test case to verify if the given raid option for the
metadata and data are actually created.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
We have no tests for testing qgroups, so we have no way of knowing
if our changes are breaking qgroups at all. Get the ball rolling
with some basic functionality tests, these just make sure we can
enable quotas and do rescan and get sane values back, as well as
make sure the limiting stuff works properly.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
For historical reasons beyond my knowledge xfstests tries to abuse the
scratch device as test device for nfs and udf. Because not all test
have inherited the right usage of the _setup_testdir and _cleanup_testdir
helpers this leads to lots of unessecary test failures.
Remove the special casing, which gets nfs down to a minimal number of
failures.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Sugned-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
The test aims to trigger snapshot-aware defrag path in write endio by
running balance, which is not expected and leads to a crash.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
btrfs replace on readonly fs should not be allowed.
Regression test case for commit:
bbb651e Btrfs: don't allow the replace procedure on read only filesystems
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
There was a problem with send trying to overwrite a file that wasn't actually
the same. This is a test to check this particular case where receive fails when
it should succeed properly. I tested this to verify it fails without my fix and
passes with my fix.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
I've been periodically failing btrfs/003 because my box sometimes takes a little
longer to unregister the device when we remove it and so the output from btrfs
dev show doesn't match what we are wanting since it still sees the device. To
fix this just stat and sleep if we still see the device node and only continue
once udev or whatever actually removes the device node so that we don't get
random failures.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
I noticed this test was hanging because mkfs.ext4 wanted to make sure it was ok
to mkfs an entire device. We need -F so it doesn't ask this question. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
We changed btrfs device add to check and see if there is an existing fs on the
device we are adding, so you now have to do -f if you want to do this. In order
to get around checking to see if we have this version of btrfs-progs just wipefs
the device we're adding to make sure the device add will pass no matter which
version of btrfs-progs you have. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
A user reported a regression where we could no longer rename a subvolume into
another subvolume. This is a test case to do just that to make sure we don't
regress on this again.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
We had a regression where you couldn't snapshot a file system if you mounted it
ro and then remounted it rw. This is a test that does just that to make sure we
don't have this problem again. I ran the test without the fix and it blew up,
and then applied the fix and verified that it passed. Thanks,
Reviewed-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
I recently added a patch to avoid sending holes with btrfs send, but I screwed
it up by not sending a hole when we did a hole punch. This is an xfstest
version of the test I wrote to show that I had a bug and to verify I was fixing
it properly. This test properly fails with my old patch and passes with my good
patch. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
This test doesn't need the scratch dev pool and it also doesn't call
_require_scratch_dev_pool, so just kick out the scratch dev pool part of the
test. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
We had a regression where you couldn't snapshot a file system if
you mounted it ro and then remounted it rw. This is a test that
does just that to make sure we don't have this problem again. I
ran the test without the fix and it blew up, and then applied the
fix and verified that it passed.
[rjohnston: renumbered test]
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
Originally, when executing "btrfs balance" right after
"btrfs subvolume snaphot" & "btrfs subvolume delete",
a kernel BUG arises.
This problem is caused by the patch:
[PATCH 1/2] Btrfs: fix for patch "cleanup: don't check
the same thing twice"
The commit id: 48475471728f060bfd2e686f592ef208d3ba8b7d
(in kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git)
handled by the patch:
[PATCH 2/3] Btrfs: fix oops caused by the space balance
and dead roots
[rjohnston: change test number to 14]
Signed-off-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
We had a regression where we were not copying csums properly when balancing a
prealloc extent. Unfortunately the way this showed up the most was with the
csum simply missing, which doesn't result in an error to userspace. So I've
copied what generic/310 does and check dmesg for csum errors when the test
starts and then compare that count to the csum errors after the test finishes to
see if there was a problem. This approach caught the error without my fix, and
then passed fine with my fix in place but with the previous errors still in
dmesg. Thanks,
[rjohnston: changed test number to 13]
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
We were actually testing this improperly, there was a bug in the set default
code so we weren't actually honoring the 0 subvolid properly. To fix this we
need to get the subvolid for the subvol we want to set as the default and use
that in the command. With this patch we now pass again with the fix for the 0
subvolid. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
Josef noticed that using /dev/zero to generate most of the test
data doesn't work if someone overrides the mount options to
enable compression. The test that performs a cancellation failed
because the replace operation was already finished when the
cancel request was executed.
Since /dev/urandom is too slow to generate multiple GB, the
way how the filesystem data is generated is completely changed
with this patch. Now /dev/urandom is used to generate one 1MB
file and this file is copied up to 2048 times. /dev/zero is no
longer used.
The runtime of the test is about the same as before. Compression
works now, online duplication will again cause issues, but
we don't have online duplication today.
Reported-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Reviewed-by: Jan Schmidt <list.xfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
Turns out btrfs-convert broke on July 3, and lo! we
do not have a regression test, and now we have one,
and there was much rejoicing.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
This test performs btrfs device replace tests with all possible profiles
(single/dup/mixed/raid0/raid1/raid10), one round with the '-r' option
to 'btrfs replace start' and one round without this option. The
cancelation is tested only once and with the dup/single profile for
metadata/data.
This test takes 181 seconds on my SSD equiped test box and 237s on
spinning disks. Almost all the time is spent when the filesystem is
populated with test data. The replace operation itself takes less than
a second for all the tests, except for the test that is marked as
'thorough' which will run for about 8 seconds on my test box.
The amount of tests done depends on the number of devices in the
SCRATCH_DEV_POOL. For full test coverage, at least 5 devices should
be available (e.g. 5 partitions). With less than 2 entries in
SCRATCH_DEV_POOL, the test is not executed.
The source and target devices for the replace operation are arbitrarily
chosen out of SCRATCH_DEV_POOl. Since the target device mustn't be
smaller than the source device, the requirement for this test is that
all devices have _exactly_ the same size. If this is not the case, the
test terminates with _notrun.
To check the filesystems after replacing a device, a scrub run is
performed, a btrfsck run, and finally the filesystem is remounted.
This commit depends on my other commit:
"xfstest: don't remove the two first devices from SCRATCH_DEV_POOL"
[rjohnston: renumbered to btrfs/011]
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
One problem was the output of "uniq -c" which added spaces depending
on the size of the count value (e.g. one space less for 10+ devices).
The second problem was that "btrfs fi show" was doing the same:
"devid %4llu size %s used %s path %s".
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
Since common/config is executed twice, if SCRATCH_DEV_POOL is configured
via the environment, the current code removes the first device entry twice
which means that you lose the second device for the test.
The fix is to not remove anything from SCRATCH_DEV_POOL anymore.
That used to be done (I can only guess) to allow to pass the
SCRATCH_DEV_POOL as an argument to _scratch_mkfs. Since _scratch_mkfs adds
the SCRATCH_DEV, the pool mustn't contain that device anymore.
A new function _scratch_pool_mkfs is introduced that does the expected
thing.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
This is to test whether snapshot-aware defrag can work well on partial extents.
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
This test failed for me with output from 'btrfs balance':
QA output created by 003
+Done, had to relocate 4 out of 4 chunks
+Done, had to relocate 5 out of 5 chunks
Silence is golden
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
Anand Jain
Josef Bacik
Christoph Hellwig
Liu Bo
Eryu Guan
Gui Hecheng
Stefan Behrens
Eric Sandeen