Currently we're checking file system consistency on TEST_DEV after every
successful test run even though the TEST_DEV might not even be used in
that test.
Fix it by introducing _require_test to for the test ti indicate that
it's about to use TEST_DEV.
Also add _require_test to the new script so that this requirement is a
default.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
There are about 198 tests which requires scratch_dev, but does not check
the file system consistency afterwards. Xfstests infrastructure does not
do it automatically, so fix it by running _check_scratch_fs() after
each test that _require_scratch.
Also remove all the _check_scratch_fs() calls that are not actually needed
and will be covered by the check script.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
If TEST_DEV or SCRATCH_DEV is symlink(mostly a lvm lv), a simple
basename is not enough, symlink should be followed.
This task is common enough, so introduce new helper functions and
replace all readlink calls in
ext4/305
generic/009
generic/019
generic/285
generic/312
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Number of helpers for checking xfs_io functionality is slowly
growing. But it's as easy to simply use _require_xfs_io_command()
directly and just specify the command we want to check. It will also
avoid the need to create helper every time we need to check a new
command in xfs_io.
Remove all the helpers and use _require_xfs_io_command() in the
tests.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Generic/009 fails when run on a file system that does not support byte range
zeroing. For example, an EOPNOTSUPP failure occurs when the test is run
on a pre-3.15 extent-mapped file system. The code in the test intended
to prevent this contains an apparent typo that results in a check for
fallocate() rather than zero range support.
Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This is based on xfs/242. This is very similar to ext4/001 however this
test has some tweaks to make it work test zero range on generic file
system. This includes turning off ext4 extents zeroout and disabling
the test for xfs on systems where PAGE_SIZE > 4096.
It is testing extent tree manipulation with fallocate zero range
operation.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Lukas Czerner
Eryu Guan
Eric Whitney