The check script requires that it be run as root, so adding
individualized checks for this in each teat is not needed.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This makes it clear when we are using "mount ; umount" versus "mount
-o remount" for most file systems. The reason for this distinction is
(a) tests may want to test the difference between what happens on the
remount versus the munt paths, (b) with tmpfs, "mount ; umount" will
cause the contents of all of the files to disappear which makes many
tests sad, and (c) some mount options may not be changed using "mount
-o remount".
Currently _scratch_mount performs "_scratch_mount ; _scratch_umount"
so mechnically rename this function to _scratch_cycle_mount. This was
done mechnically using the script fragment:
git grep "_scratch_remount" | \
awk -F: '{print $1}' | sort -u | \
xargs sed -i 's/_scratch_remount/_scratch_cycle_mount/g'
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Test extent pre-allocation (using fallocate) into a region that already has a
pre-allocated extent that ends beyond the file's size. Verify that if the fs
is unmounted immediately after, the file's size and content are not lost.
This is motivated by a minor issue found in btrfs where the second fallocate
wouldn't update the inode's i_size on disk, fixed by the following btrfs
patch: "Btrfs: add missing inode item update in fallocate()".
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Theodore Ts'o
Filipe Manana