This commit adds a test to verify constant d_ino feature. The
following scenarios are checked,
- Parent's (i.e. "..") d_ino must always be calculated because a
pure dir can be residing inside a merged dir.
- d_ino for "." must always be calculated because the present
directory can have a copy-up origin.
- Verify d_ino of '.' and '..' before and after dir becomes impure.
While at it also verify if trusted.overlay.impure xattr is
set/reset appropriately and invalidation of readdir cache.
- Verify copied up file's (inside a impure dir) d_ino.
- Verify d_ino values corresponding to "." and ".." entries of a
pure lower dir.
- Verify d_ino of ".." entry of a merged dir.
- Verify pure lower residing in dir which has another lower layer
Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
- Upper/lower mismatch
- Index/upper mismatch
With index=on, lowerdir and upperdir are verified using a file
handle stored in trusted.overlay.origin xattr in upperdir and
indexdir.
Failure to verify lowerdir/upperdir on mount results in ESTALE.
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Overlayfs hardlink test are expected to fail if overlayfs does not
support the inodes index feature, so don't un them if kernel does
not support the feature.
If the feature is supported, enable it with the index=on mount option
for the hardlink tests, regardless of the build time default determined
by kernel config option CONFIG_OVERLAY_FS_INDEX.
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Overlayfs is often used to mount several mounts that share a single
lower dir, but every overlayfs mount should have its own private
upperdir and private workdir.
Overlayfs mount on kernel <= v4.12 does not check if upper/work dirs
are currently in-use by another overlayfs mount on the system and bad
things can happen with such configuration.
Expect EBUSY when trying to mount overlay when:
- Upper dir is in-use by another overlay mount
- Work dir is in-use by another overlay mount
This test does not depend on the overlay index feature.
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Verify that overlay is mounted read-only and that it cannot
be remounted rw.
- Mount with no upper dir
- Failure to create work dir
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Add tests overlay/022 and overlay/024 to overlay/mount test group.
These tests check behavior of overlay mount cases.
Cc: Xiong Zhou <xzhou@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
When overlayfs is configured with CONFIG_OVERLAY_FS_INDEX=y,
workdir from previous overlay mount cannot be reused in a new
overlay mount that uses a different upper dir.
Fix the test to use a different workdir when mounting with a
different upper dir.
This change has not effect on older kernels and overlay
configured without CONFIG_OVERLAY_FS_INDEX.
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
nlink of overlay inode could be dropped indefinitely by adding
un-accounted lower hardlinks underneath a mounted overlay and
trying to remove them.
The simplest way to understand this test is this:
Imagine that you have a tool (e.g. xfs_db) with which you can add
hardlinks, without changing the value of nlink stored on-disk for
the inode. This is exactly what this test does when it adds lower
hardlinks underneath a mounted overlay.
Commit 5f8415d6b87e ("ovl: persistent overlay inode nlink for
indexed inodes") fixes this issue, although the issue was never
exposed in any released kernel.
With overlayfs indexed copy up and without the fix, the test
triggers WARN_ON(inode->i_nlink == 0) in drop_link().
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
nlink of overlay inode should account for the union of lower
and upper hardlinks.
persistent overlay union nlink is stored in an extended attribute
on the upper inode.
In order to test persistent overlay nlink accounting, the test is
repeated with both warm and cold dentry/inode cache.
[eguan: add comments on what fields report_nlink prints]
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Two tasks make a modification concurrently on two hardlinks of a
large lower inode. The copy up should be triggered by one of the
tasks and the other should be waiting for copy up to complete. Both
copy up targets should end up being upper hardlinks and both
metadata changes should be visible in both hardlinks.
With kernel <= v4.12, hardlinks are broken on copy up, meaning that
copy up is performed independetly and the resulting upper copy up
targets each have only one of the the metadata changes visible.
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Test that when two lower hardlinks are copied up, they end up
as two upper hardlinks of the same upper inode.
Drop caches before copy up so there is no knowledge of the
copied up hardlink in inode/dcache.
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
This test checks if overlayfs hardlinks are preserved across
copy up. Check if they are preserved also after copy up and
mount cycle.
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
diff may skip comparing content of files with identical st_ino/st_dev.
Overlayfs stat(2) may return same st_dev/st_ino for hardlink copy ups,
but it does not mean that read(2) will return the same content.
Convert the test to output hardlink files content to golden output
instead of using diff.
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Use helpers to records and check inode numbers so we can repeat
the same test after each hardlink copy up and mount cycle.
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
In overlay/031, it only cover the test case of whiteouts in
origined upper dir. This patch add two cases cover the other
two situations:
1) Lower origined dir have whiteouts;
2) Both upper and lower origined dirs have whiteouts (although
this case is pass now, still add this to cover all three kinds
of situations).
Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Factor out helper for create an leftover whiteout,
this is common to repeat test of whiteout check in
different underlaying directories.
Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
The unmerged and impure upper directories may contain invalid
whiteouts when we umount && modify lowerdir(e.g. clean up dir) and
remount overlay. This may lead to whiteouts exposure and rmdir
failure.
This case test impure dir's whiteouts check in ovl_iterate() and
ovl_remove_xxx().
Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Currently hardlinks do not preserve the inode number across copy up,
so hardlinks did not participate in this test so far.
Stay honest and let the test verify what is was meant to verify and
let it fail because of the fact that hardlinks inode numbers are not
constant across copy up.
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
'find -ino' is this test was supposed to filter files by inode
number that was recorded with 'ls -i' to compare st_ino returned by
stat(2) with d_ino returned by getdents64(2).
It turns out that on some systems, 'find -ino' uses stat(2) for
filtering by inode number, which is not what we want.
Use the auxiliary program t_dir_type to filter files by inode number
instead.
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Overlayfs directory inodes are constant across copy up,
but not persistent on mount cycle.
Compare the inode numbers before and after mount cycle.
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
The test verifies constant inode number after copy up.
Verify that inode number remains constant also after rename
and drop caches (when overlayfs needs to find the lower
inodes in another location).
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Use helpers to records and check inode numbers so we can repeat
the same test after rename and mount cycle.
Suggested-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Align all comments to the term 'constant inode numbers' and
explain why hardlinks are excluded from this test.
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Chandan Rajendra
Amir Goldstein
zhangyi (F)