Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dave Chinner c941f156e9 common: don't check scratch dev on all tests
Some tests deliberately corrupt  scratch devices and so will fail
the post-test check. Add a "_require_scratch_nocheck" helper
function for such tests to avoid false test failure detection.

Also, ensure that _notrun cleans up the trigger for the post-test
checks. Otherwise the next test to run may try to validate the
scratch/test devices even though they are not used by the test.

Further, _check_xfs_filesystem() causes check to exit if it finds a
corruption. This is extremely annoying as it terminates the entire
test run rather than just reporting that the test fails. Hence add
an "iam != check" test before exiting so that calls from tests will
cause the test to fail, but calls from check won't cause the harness
to exit.

There are still some tests that fail the scratch check, these are
not obvious test failures and so need further investigation to
determine the cause of the failures.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
2014-09-08 20:48:45 +10:00
Lukas Czerner ab1d756fe1 common: Check the file system consistency on SCRATCH_DEV
There are about 198 tests which requires scratch_dev, but does not check
the file system consistency afterwards. Xfstests infrastructure does not
do it automatically, so fix it by running _check_scratch_fs() after
each test that _require_scratch.

Also remove all the _check_scratch_fs() calls that are not actually needed
and will be covered by the check script.

Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
2014-08-13 11:01:04 +10:00
Lukas Czerner 3128e9c55d generic/321, 322: do not remove lost+found
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
2014-01-20 12:48:33 +11:00
Josef Bacik 640d1e1e16 generic: add new test for fsync() on directories
Btrfs had some issues with fsync()'ing directories and fsync()'ing
after renames.  These three new tests cover the 3 different issues
we were seeing.  This breaks out the dmflakey stuff into a common
helper to be shared between generic/311 and this new test.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
2013-12-03 10:29:36 +11:00