For tests that only overwrite part of a file, only consider the number
of extents in the *rewritten* blocks when deciding if the FS
fragmentation performance is satisfactory.
(Also slip in a fix for xfs/127 so that it formats correctly when we
specify big blocksizes via MKFS_OPTIONS.)
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This test is only valid for CRC enabled XFS, and test fails with
MKFS_OPTIONS="-m crc=0" being set (no mount failure detected).
Fix it by adding _require_scratch_xfs_crc, which ensures scratch device
has CRC support and enabled.
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Extend _require_xfs_io_command so that we can pass it a command line
argument to look for, and then use new capabililty in the relevant
tests to ensure that bmap knows how to dump CoW fork contents (bmap -c)
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
When default quota is set, all different quota types inherits the
same default value, include group quota. So if a user quota limit
larger than the default user quota value, it will still be limited
by the group default quota value.
An upstream patch for this bug:
xfs: Split default quota limits by quota type
Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
The check script requires that it be run as root, so adding
individualized checks for this in each teat is not needed.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This makes it clear when we are using "mount ; umount" versus "mount
-o remount" for most file systems. The reason for this distinction is
(a) tests may want to test the difference between what happens on the
remount versus the munt paths, (b) with tmpfs, "mount ; umount" will
cause the contents of all of the files to disappear which makes many
tests sad, and (c) some mount options may not be changed using "mount
-o remount".
Currently _test_mount performs "_test_mount ; _test_umount"
so mechnically rename this function to _test_cycle_mount. This was
done mechnically using the script fragment:
git grep -E "_test_remount" | \
awk -F: '{print $1}' | sort -u | grep -v tests/xfs/189 \
xargs sed -i 's/_test_remount/_test_cycle_mount/g'
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This makes it clear when we are using "mount ; umount" versus "mount
-o remount" for most file systems. The reason for this distinction is
(a) tests may want to test the difference between what happens on the
remount versus the munt paths, (b) with tmpfs, "mount ; umount" will
cause the contents of all of the files to disappear which makes many
tests sad, and (c) some mount options may not be changed using "mount
-o remount".
Currently _scratch_mount performs "_scratch_mount ; _scratch_umount"
so mechnically rename this function to _scratch_cycle_mount. This was
done mechnically using the script fragment:
git grep "_scratch_remount" | \
awk -F: '{print $1}' | sort -u | \
xargs sed -i 's/_scratch_remount/_scratch_cycle_mount/g'
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
xfs/133 and xfs/138 use too much code to do "return value" check,
it's not necessary. For the code can be more readable and clear,
I change "return value" check to golden image check.
Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Since 'quick' tests are supposed to run in < 15s, kick out the ones
that can't finish that soon even on fast storage.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Ensure that we can CoW the source file when the source file consists
of a range of mixed block types and there's a cowextsize hint set.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Christoph Hellwig discovered that the kernel crashed trying to free
the refcount btree per-ag reservation on a ro mount (because we don't
create the reservation except for rw mounts and ro->rw remounts). So,
test this to make sure we never do that again. :)
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Use the extent size hint to force leftover CoW reservations then
crash the filesystem to see how recovery works.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Perform copy-on-writes at random offsets to stress the CoW allocation
system. Assess the effectiveness of the extent size hint at
combatting fragmentation via unshare, a rewrite, and no-op after the
random writes.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Create a couple of XFS-specific tests -- one to check that growing
and shrinking the refcount btree works and a second one to check
what happens when we hit maximum refcount.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Fix style problems such as unnecessary use of quotes, add helper
variables to reduce visual clutter, and other minor fixes to make the
first batch of tests more closely resemble the second round tests.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>