This makes it clear when we are using "mount ; umount" versus "mount
-o remount" for most file systems. The reason for this distinction is
(a) tests may want to test the difference between what happens on the
remount versus the munt paths, (b) with tmpfs, "mount ; umount" will
cause the contents of all of the files to disappear which makes many
tests sad, and (c) some mount options may not be changed using "mount
-o remount".
Currently _scratch_mount performs "_scratch_mount ; _scratch_umount"
so mechnically rename this function to _scratch_cycle_mount. This was
done mechnically using the script fragment:
git grep "_scratch_remount" | \
awk -F: '{print $1}' | sort -u | \
xargs sed -i 's/_scratch_remount/_scratch_cycle_mount/g'
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Replace every explicit mount/umount of scratch or test devices with
helper functions. This allows the next patch to add in hooks to these
functions in order to set up & tear down overlayfs on every mount/umount
(also adds _test_unmount(), which didn't exist prior)
[Eryu Guan rebased the patch agains latest master and replaced more
mount/umount with helpers]
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
For historical reasons beyond my knowledge xfstests tries to abuse the
scratch device as test device for nfs and udf. Because not all test
have inherited the right usage of the _setup_testdir and _cleanup_testdir
helpers this leads to lots of unessecary test failures.
Remove the special casing, which gets nfs down to a minimal number of
failures.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Sugned-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Current numbering is inheried from the single testsuite series. There
are only 6 btrfs-specific tests and it makes more sense to start adding
new ones at a more natural place than 300-something. There's no overlap
with the old and new numbers and I hope there' will be no confusion when
referencing them.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
Dave Chinner
Theodore Ts'o
Eric Sandeen
Wang Shilong
Christoph Hellwig
David Sterba