Now that we run the test for all block device based file systems, there
is no reason to keep it out of generic.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Add _require_scratch_duperemove which validates that the file system
supports duperemove. This allows us to move three tests from shared/
to generic/. This means these tests will automatically adapt when
duperemove supports other file systems. Tests moved are:
shared/008 --> generic/559
shared/009 --> generic/560
shared/010 --> generic/561
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
The shared/006 uses _scratch_mkfs_sized to create a limited size
file system, and then creates inodes until it gets ENOSPC, and then
checks to make sure the file system is consistent. It then remounts
the file system, removes all of the files, and makes sure the file
system is consistent afterwards. This test was marked as only being
supported on ext[234] and xfs, and so it was in shared.
Now introduce a new _require_inode_limits() rule to run test on
filesystems that have a fixed inode number, then move the test to
generic.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
The tests shared/{001,003,004,272} test behaviour around the ext4's
journal. As such, they are pointless to run on ext2, and ext3 no
longer is in kernels newer than 4.3. (And most enterprise
distributions have been using ext4 to support the ext3 file system;
that capability has been around since 2.6.33.) So we can move these
tests out of shared and into the ext4 class of tests:
shared/001 --> ext4/036
shared/003 --> ext4/037
shared/004 --> ext4/038
shared/272 --> ext4/039
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
A test to perform reads/writes under various cgroups and verify that
I/Os are accounted properly according to cgroup aware writeback.
This is a generic test, but not all commonly used local filesystems
support cgroup aware writeback at the moment (i.e., XFS). Therefore,
this test currently requires ext4 or btrfs for the time being.
The common/cgroup2 file is copied from a separate cgroup related
patch from Shaohua Li that never made it upstream.
Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Some tests that use dmflakey to test filesystem consistency after a power
failure are in the 'log' group while others are not. So fix the
incosistency and put them all under the 'log' group.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Run several duperemove processes with fsstress on same directory at
same time. Make sure the race won't break the fs or kernel.
Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
This case does dedupe on a dir, then copy the dir to next dir.
Dedupe the next dir again, then copy this dir to next again, and
dedupe again ... At the end, verify the data in the last dir is
still same with the first one.
Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Duperemove is a tool for finding duplicated extents and submitting
them for deduplication, and it supports XFS. This case trys to
verify the integrity of XFS after running duperemove.
Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
The ACL test shared/051 was very similar to generic/099 which was not
being run and was just removed; most likely the script was copy+pasted
at some point. Since shared/051 has been getting maintained+run and is
not really XFS and UDF-specific, move it to generic, reusing the old
number of 099. One change was required for it to work on other
filesystems: the output of 'find' must be sorted.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Craft a malicious filesystem image with a negative inode size,
then try to trigger a kernel DoS by appending data to the file.
Ideally this should trigger verifier errors instead of hanging.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Once upon a time, ext4 encounter NULL pointer dereference under this
situaiton due to jump to a wrong label. Part of this commit fixed
this Oops:
744692d ext4: use ext4_get_block_write in buffer write
We can also run this test on ext2/3.
This case is based on a script from Monakhov Dmitriy @ openvz.
Cc: Monakhov Dmitriy <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Xiong Zhou <xzhou@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This test is motivated by an issue found in btrfs.
It test that after syncing the filesystem, adding many xattrs to a file,
syncing the filesystem again, writing to the file and then doing a fsync
against that file, all the xattrs still exists after a power failure.
That is, after the fsync log/journal is replayed, the xattrs still exist
and with the correct values.
The btrfs issue is fixed by the patch titled:
"Btrfs: fix fsync xattr loss in the fast fsync path"
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
ext4 should hold i_mutex when truncating orhpan inodes, or a WARNING
would be triggered. This commit fixed this issue.
721e3eb ext4: lock i_mutex when truncating orphan inodes
Though it's an ext4 specific issue, there's no harm to test on ext2/3
too, as debugfs is used to set orphan inode list.
This test is based on a script from Lukas Czerner.
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
The test shared/243 really is ext4 specific even though currently we
would run it on other file systems as well, it would not actually do any
testing.
So move it to ext4 specific directory and rename it to 002.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
There are couple of tests in shared directory which really should be
made generic, so move it. It is mostly collapse range tests, which
really can be generic to make super we test every file system which adds
collapse range support.
Here is what we're moving in this commit.
shared/001 -> generic/021
shared/002 -> generic/022
shared/003 -> generic/012
shared/004 -> generic/016
shared/005 -> generic/017
shared/218 -> generic/018
shared/305 -> generic/019
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Test fs by using up all inodes and check fs.
Also a regression test for xfsprogs commit
d586858 xfs_repair: fix sibling pointer tests in verify_dir2_path()
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
We execute collapse range multiple times on same file. Each
collapse range call collapses a single alternate block. After the
test execution, file will be left with 80 blocks and as much number
of extents. We also check for file system consistency after the
completion.
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
shared/004 tries to test various corner cases with delayed extents
and pre-existing holes for fcollapse range functionality over
different type of extents.
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com>
shared/003 tries to test various corner cases with pre-existing holes
for fcollapse range functionality over different type of extents.
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com>
shared/002 tries to test various corner cases with delayed extents
for fcollapse range functionality over different type of extents.
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
These are tests that are shared between multiple filesystems (moved
to shared), and udf/btrfs/ext4 specific tests, moved to appropriate
directories.
I created the "shared" directory to indicate tests that are not
truly generic, but also not filesystem specific. They might rely on
a feature that is only implmented in a few filesystems and so can't
be truly generic.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Phil White <pwhite@sgi.com>
[rjohnston@sgi.com reworked for TOT changes]
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
Christoph Hellwig
Theodore Ts'o
Brian Foster
Filipe Manana
Zorro Lang
Eric Biggers
Darrick J. Wong
Guangwen Feng
Xiong Zhou
Eryu Guan
Lukas Czerner
Namjae Jeon
Dave Chinner