The check script requires that it be run as root, so adding
individualized checks for this in each teat is not needed.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This makes it clear when we are using "mount ; umount" versus "mount
-o remount" for most file systems. The reason for this distinction is
(a) tests may want to test the difference between what happens on the
remount versus the munt paths, (b) with tmpfs, "mount ; umount" will
cause the contents of all of the files to disappear which makes many
tests sad, and (c) some mount options may not be changed using "mount
-o remount".
Currently _scratch_mount performs "_scratch_mount ; _scratch_umount"
so mechnically rename this function to _scratch_cycle_mount. This was
done mechnically using the script fragment:
git grep "_scratch_remount" | \
awk -F: '{print $1}' | sort -u | \
xargs sed -i 's/_scratch_remount/_scratch_cycle_mount/g'
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This commit makes use of the new _filter_xfs_io_blocks_modified filtering
function to print information in terms of file blocks rather than file
offset.
Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This is a test to verify that the btrfs ioctl clone operation is
able to clone extents of a file to different positions of the file,
that is, the source and target files are the same. Existing tests
only cover the case where the source and target files are different.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Theodore Ts'o
Chandan Rajendra
David Disseldorp
Filipe David Borba Manana