backporting fixes so that garbage collection doesn't have to trigger
execution of arbitrary Python code just to figure out whether
an object has a __del__ method.
revision 2.164
date: 2002/10/29 18:36:40; author: gvanrossum; state: Exp; lines: +12 -13
Since properties are supported here, is possible that
instance_getattr2() raises an exception. Fix all code that made this
assumption.
Fix for SF bug 532646. This is a little simpler than what Neal
suggested there, based upon a better analysis (__getattr__ is a red
herring).
[This might be a 2.1 bugfix candidate we well, if people care]
and functions: we only need to call PyObject_ClearWeakRefs() if the weakref
list is non-NULL. Since these objects are common but weakrefs are still
unusual, saving the call at deallocation time makes a lot of sense.
There really isn't a good reason for instance method objects to have
their own __dict__, __doc__ and __name__ properties that just delegate
the request to the function (callable); the default attribute behavior
already does this.
The test suite had to be fixed because the error changes from
TypeError to AttributeError.
no backwards compatibility to worry about, so I just pushed the
'closure' struct member to the back -- it's never used in the current
code base (I may eliminate it, but that's more work because the getter
and setter signatures would have to change.)
As examples, I added actual docstrings to the getset attributes of a
few types: file.closed, xxsubtype.spamdict.state.
compatibility, this required all places where an array of "struct
memberlist" structures was declared that is referenced from a type's
tp_members slot to change the type of the structure to PyMemberDef;
"struct memberlist" is now only used by old code that still calls
PyMember_Get/Set. The code in PyObject_GenericGetAttr/SetAttr now
calls the new APIs PyMember_GetOne/SetOne, which take a PyMemberDef
argument.
As examples, I added actual docstrings to the attributes of a few
types: file, complex, instance method, super, and xxsubtype.spamlist.
Also converted the symtable to new style getattr.
descriptors for each attribute. The getattr() implementation is
similar to PyObject_GenericGetAttr(), but delegates to im_self instead
of looking in __dict__; I couldn't do this as a wrapper around
PyObject_GenericGetAttr().
XXX A problem here is that this is a case of *delegation*. dir()
doesn't see exactly the same attributes that are actually defined;
e.g. if the delegate is a Python function object, it supports
attributes like func_code etc., but these are not visible to dir(); on
the other hand, dynamic function attributes (stored in the function's
__dict__) *are* visible to dir(). Maybe we need a mechanism to tell
dir() about the delegation mechanism? I vaguely recall seeing a
request in the newsgroup for a more formal definition of attribute
delegation too. Sigh, time for a new PEP.
iterable object. I'm not sure how that got overlooked before!
Got rid of the internal _PySequence_IterContains, introduced a new
internal _PySequence_IterSearch, and rewrote all the iteration-based
"count of", "index of", and "is the object in it or not?" routines to
just call the new function. I suppose it's slower this way, but the
code duplication was getting depressing.
the base classes is not a classic class, and its class (the metaclass)
is callable, call the metaclass to do the deed.
One effect of this is that, when mixing classic and new-style classes
amongst the bases of a class, it doesn't matter whether the first base
class is a classic class or not: you will always get the error
"TypeError: metatype conflict among bases". (Formerly, with a classic
class first, you'd get "TypeError: PyClass_New: base must be a class".)
Another effect is that multiple inheritance from ExtensionClass.Base,
with a classic class as the first class, transfers control to the
ExtensionClass.Base class. This is what we need for SF #443239 (and
also for running Zope under 2.2a4, before ExtensionClass is replaced).
While not even documented, they were clearly part of the C API,
there's no great difficulty to support them, and it has the cool
effect of not requiring any changes to ExtensionClass.c.
an inappropriate first argument. Now that there are more ways for
this to fail, make sure to report the name of the class of the
expected instance and of the actual instance.
This introduces:
- A new operator // that means floor division (the kind of division
where 1/2 is 0).
- The "future division" statement ("from __future__ import division)
which changes the meaning of the / operator to implement "true
division" (where 1/2 is 0.5).
- New overloadable operators __truediv__ and __floordiv__.
- New slots in the PyNumberMethods struct for true and floor division,
new abstract APIs for them, new opcodes, and so on.
I emphasize that without the future division statement, the semantics
of / will remain unchanged until Python 3.0.
Not yet implemented are warnings (default off) when / is used with int
or long arguments.
This has been on display since 7/31 as SF patch #443474.
Flames to /dev/null.
