In 2.5 the email version was bumped to 4.0.2 just before release but
after the maintenance branch was set up. The bump was not backported
to trunk, and 2.6 went out the door with a version number of 4.0.1.
I bumped this to 4.0.2 because of a behavior change, but that makes
it look the same as 2.5. So bump it again to 4.0.3.
base64 transfer-encoded payload *after* decoding it; it no longer does.
email had a special method in utils, _bdecode, specifically to do this,
so it must have served a purpose at some point, yet it is clearly wrong
per RFC. Fixed with Barry's approval, but no backport. Email package
minor version number is bumped, now version 4.0.1.
Patch by Joaquin Cuenca Abela.
Specifically, instead of raising a ValueError when there is a single tick in
the parameter, simply return that the entire string unquoted, with None for
both the charset and the language. Also, if there are more than 2 ticks in
the parameter, interpret the first three parts as the standard RFC 2231 parts,
then the rest of the parts as the encoded string.
Test cases added.
Original fewer-than-3-parts fix by Tokio Kikuchi.
Resolves SF bug # 1218081. I will back port the fix and tests to Python 2.4
(email 3.0) and Python 2.3 (email 2.5).
Also, bump the version number to email 4.0.1, removing the 'alpha' moniker.
SF bug #1403349 solution for email 3.0; some MUAs use the 'file' parameter
name in the Content-Distribution header, so Message.get_filename() should fall
back to using that. Will port to the Python 2.5 trunk.
Also, bump the email package version to 3.0.1 for eventual release. Of
course, add a test case too.
XXX Need to update the documentation.
caused by a self._input.readline() call that wasn't checking for the
NeedsMoreData marker.
msg_43.txt contains a message that illustrates the problem, when
email.message_from_*() is called. That interface uses the Parser API, which
splits reads into 8192 byte chunks. It so happens that for the test message,
the 8192 chunk falls inside a message/delivery-status, which is where in the
FeedParser the readline() call was that didn't check for NeedsMoreData.
I also added an assert to unreadline() so it'll be more evident if an attempt
to push back NeedsMoreData ever happens again.
Bump the email package version number.
Briefly (from the NEWS file):
- Updates for the email package:
+ All deprecated APIs that in email 2.x issued warnings have been removed:
_encoder argument to the MIMEText constructor, Message.add_payload(),
Utils.dump_address_pair(), Utils.decode(), Utils.encode()
+ New deprecations: Generator.__call__(), Message.get_type(),
Message.get_main_type(), Message.get_subtype(), the 'strict' argument to
the Parser constructor. These will be removed in email 3.1.
+ Support for Python earlier than 2.3 has been removed (see PEP 291).
+ All defect classes have been renamed to end in 'Defect'.
+ Some FeedParser fixes; also a MultipartInvariantViolationDefect will be
added to messages that claim to be multipart but really aren't.
+ Updates to documentation.
in some locales. This code simplifies the boundary algorithm to use
randint() which is what we wanted anyway.
Bump package version to 2.5.3.
Backport candidate for Python 2.2.3
