In C++, it's an error to pass a string literal to a char* function
without a const_cast(). Rather than require every C++ extension
module to put a cast around string literals, fix the API to state the
const-ness.
I focused on parts of the API where people usually pass literals:
PyArg_ParseTuple() and friends, Py_BuildValue(), PyMethodDef, the type
slots, etc. Predictably, there were a large set of functions that
needed to be fixed as a result of these changes. The most pervasive
change was to make the keyword args list passed to
PyArg_ParseTupleAndKewords() to be a const char *kwlist[].
One cast was required as a result of the changes: A type object
mallocs the memory for its tp_doc slot and later frees it.
PyTypeObject says that tp_doc is const char *; but if the type was
created by type_new(), we know it is safe to cast to char *.
number. This accounts for the 2 refcount leaks per test_complex run
Michael Hudson discovered (I figured only I would have the stomach to
look for leaks in floating-point code <wink>).
constructor, when passed a single complex argument, returns the
argument unchanged. This should be done only for the complex base
class; a complex subclass should of course cast the value to the
subclass in this case.
The fix also revealed a segfault in complex_getnewargs(): the argument
for the Py_BuildValue() format code "D" is the *address* of a
Py_complex struct, not the value. (This corroborated by the API
documentation.)
I expect this needs to be backported to 2.2.3.
types. The special handling for these can now be removed from save_newobj().
Add some testing for this.
Also add support for setting the 'fast' flag on the Python Pickler class,
which suppresses use of the memo.
comments everywhere that bugged me: /* Foo is inlined */ instead of
/* Inline Foo */. Somehow the "is inlined" phrase always confused me
for half a second (thinking, "No it isn't" until I added the missing
"here"). The new phrase is hopefully unambiguous.
Complex numbers implement divmod() and //, neither of which makes one
lick of sense. Unfortunately this is documented, so I'm adding a
deprecation warning now, so we can delete this silliness, oh, around
2005 or so.
Bugfix candidate (At least for 2.2.2, I think.)
Konrad was too kind. Not only did it raise an exception, the specific
exception it raised made no sense. These are old bugs in complex_pow()
and friends:
1. Raising 0 to a negative power isn't a range error, it's a domain
error, so changed c_pow() to set errno to EDOM in that case instead
of ERANGE.
2. Changed complex_pow() to:
A. Used the Py_ADJUST_ERANGE2 macro to try to clear errno of a spurious
ERANGE error due to underflow in the libm pow() called by c_pow().
B. Produced different exceptions depending on the errno value:
i) For errno==EDOM, raise ZeroDivisionError instead of ValueError.
This is for consistency with the non-complex cases 0.0**-2 and
0**-2 and 0L**-2.
ii) For errno==ERANGE, raise OverflowError.
Bugfix candidate.
