because the test file, msg_26.txt which has \r\n line endings, was
getting munged by cvs, which knows to do line ending conversions for
text files. But we want \r\n to be preserved on all platforms, so we
cvs admin'd the file to be -kb (binary), which means we have to open
the file in binary mode to preserve these line ends. Hopefully this
will be the end of the thrashing on this issue (but probably not).
Test passes on *nix now, and Tim confirms it passes on Windows. We'll
leave it to Jack to test MacOS.
is passed straight through to the unicode() and ustr.encode() calls.
I think it's the best we can do to address the UnicodeErrors in badly
encoded headers such as is described in SF bug #648119.
file, needed because some binary distros (read RPMs) don't include the
test module in their standard Python package. This eliminates an
external dependency and closes SF bug # 650441.
binary distros (read RPMs) don't include the test module in their
standard Python package. This eliminates an external dependency and
closes SF bug # 650441.
where in lax parsing, the first non-header line after a header block
(e.g. the first line not containing a colon, and not a continuation),
can be treated as the first body line, even without the RFC mandated
blank line separator.
rfc822 had this behavior, and I vaguely remember problems with this,
but can't remember details. In any event, all the tests still pass,
so I guess we'll find out. ;/
This patch works by returning the non-header, non-continuation line
from _parseheader() and using that as the first header line prepended
to fp.read() if given. It's usually None.
We use this approach instead of trying to seek/tell the file-like
object.
multipart/digest isn't a message/rfc822. This is legal, but counter
to recommended practice in RFC 2046, $5.1.5.
The fix is to look at the content type after setting the default
content type. If the maintype is then message or multipart, attach
the parsed subobject, otherwise use set_payload() to set the data of
the other object.
