svn+ssh://pythondev@svn.python.org/python/trunk
........
r75570 | antoine.pitrou | 2009-10-20 23:29:37 +0200 (mar., 20 oct. 2009) | 6 lines
Issue #1722344: threading._shutdown() is now called in Py_Finalize(), which
fixes the problem of some exceptions being thrown at shutdown when the
interpreter is killed. Patch by Adam Olsen.
........
svn+ssh://pythondev@svn.python.org/python/trunk
........
r74841 | thomas.wouters | 2009-09-16 14:55:54 -0500 (Wed, 16 Sep 2009) | 23 lines
Fix issue #1590864, multiple threads and fork() can cause deadlocks, by
acquiring the import lock around fork() calls. This prevents other threads
from having that lock while the fork happens, and is the recommended way of
dealing with such issues. There are two other locks we care about, the GIL
and the Thread Local Storage lock. The GIL is obviously held when calling
Python functions like os.fork(), and the TLS lock is explicitly reallocated
instead, while also deleting now-orphaned TLS data.
This only fixes calls to os.fork(), not extension modules or embedding
programs calling C's fork() directly. Solving that requires a new set of API
functions, and possibly a rewrite of the Python/thread_*.c mess. Add a
warning explaining the problem to the documentation in the mean time.
This also changes behaviour a little on AIX. Before, AIX (but only AIX) was
getting the import lock reallocated, seemingly to avoid this very same
problem. This is not the right approach, because the import lock is a
re-entrant one, and reallocating would do the wrong thing when forking while
holding the import lock.
Will backport to 2.6, minus the tiny AIX behaviour change.
........
svn+ssh://pythondev@svn.python.org/python/trunk
........
r75223 | benjamin.peterson | 2009-10-03 15:23:24 -0500 (Sat, 03 Oct 2009) | 1 line
#7050 fix a SystemError when using tuple unpacking and augmented assignment
........
svn+ssh://pythondev@svn.python.org/python/trunk
........
r73750 | benjamin.peterson | 2009-07-01 19:45:19 -0400 (Wed, 01 Jul 2009) | 1 line
small optimization: avoid popping the current block until we have to
........
svn+ssh://pythondev@svn.python.org/python/trunk
........
r72487 | jeffrey.yasskin | 2009-05-08 17:51:06 -0400 (Fri, 08 May 2009) | 7 lines
PyCode_NewEmpty:
Most uses of PyCode_New found by http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=PyCode_New
are trying to build an empty code object, usually to put it in a dummy frame
object. This patch adds a PyCode_NewEmpty wrapper which lets the user specify
just the filename, function name, and first line number, instead of also
requiring lots of code internals.
........
r72488 | jeffrey.yasskin | 2009-05-08 18:23:21 -0400 (Fri, 08 May 2009) | 13 lines
Issue 5954, PyFrame_GetLineNumber:
Most uses of PyCode_Addr2Line
(http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=PyCode_Addr2Line) are just trying to get
the line number of a specified frame, but there's no way to do that directly.
Forcing people to go through the code object makes them know more about the
guts of the interpreter than they should need.
The remaining uses of PyCode_Addr2Line seem to be getting the line from a
traceback (for example,
http://www.google.com/codesearch/p?hl=en#u_9_nDrchrw/pygame-1.7.1release/src/base.c&q=PyCode_Addr2Line),
which is replaced by the tb_lineno field. So we may be able to deprecate
PyCode_Addr2Line entirely for external use.
........
r72879 | jeffrey.yasskin | 2009-05-23 19:23:01 -0400 (Sat, 23 May 2009) | 14 lines
Issue #6042:
lnotab-based tracing is very complicated and isn't documented very well. There
were at least 3 comment blocks purporting to document co_lnotab, and none did a
very good job. This patch unifies them into Objects/lnotab_notes.txt which
tries to completely capture the current state of affairs.
I also discovered that we've attached 2 layers of patches to the basic tracing
scheme. The first layer avoids jumping to instructions that don't start a line,
to avoid problems in if statements and while loops. The second layer
discovered that jumps backward do need to trace at instructions that don't
start a line, so it added extra lnotab entries for 'while' and 'for' loops, and
added a special case for backward jumps within the same line. I replaced these
patches by just treating forward and backward jumps differently.
........
