Currently walruses are not allowerd in set literals and set comprehensions:
>>> {y := 4, 4**2, 3**3}
File "<stdin>", line 1
{y := 4, 4**2, 3**3}
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
but they should be allowed as well per PEP 572.
(cherry picked from commit b0aba1fcdc)
Co-authored-by: Pablo Galindo <Pablogsal@gmail.com>
* Implement running the parser a second time for the errors messages
The first parser run is only responsible for detecting whether
there is a `SyntaxError` or not. If there isn't the AST gets returned.
Otherwise, the parser is run a second time with all the `invalid_*`
rules enabled so that all the customized error messages get produced.
(cherry picked from commit bca7014032)
This program can segfault the parser by stack overflow:
```
import ast
code = "f(" + ",".join(['a' for _ in range(100000)]) + ")"
print("Ready!")
ast.parse(code)
```
the reason is that the rule for arguments has a simple recursion when collecting args:
args[expr_ty]:
[...]
| a=named_expression b=[',' c=args { c }] {
[...] }.
(cherry picked from commit 4a97b1517a)
Co-authored-by: Pablo Galindo <Pablogsal@gmail.com>
`GET_INVALID_TARGET` might unexpectedly return `NULL`, which if not
caught will cause a SEGFAULT. Therefore, this commit introduces a new
inline function `RAISE_SYNTAX_ERROR_INVALID_TARGET` that always
checks for `GET_INVALID_TARGET` returning NULL and can be used in
the grammar, replacing the long C ternary operation used till now.
(cherry picked from commit 6c4e0bd974)
Automerge-Triggered-By: @pablogsal
* bpo-40334: Produce better error messages on invalid targets (GH-20106)
The following error messages get produced:
- `cannot delete ...` for invalid `del` targets
- `... is an illegal 'for' target` for invalid targets in for
statements
- `... is an illegal 'with' target` for invalid targets in
with statements
Additionally, a few `cut`s were added in various places before the
invocation of the `invalid_*` rule, in order to speed things
up.
Co-authored-by: Pablo Galindo <Pablogsal@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 01ece63d42)
The error message, generated for a non-parenthesized generator expression
in function calls, was still the generic `invalid syntax`, when the generator expression wasn't appearing as the first argument in the call. With this patch, even on input like `f(a, b, c for c in d, e)`, the correct error message gets produced.
(cherry picked from commit ae14583302)
Co-authored-by: Lysandros Nikolaou <lisandrosnik@gmail.com>
This commit fixes the new parser to disallow invalid targets in the
following scenarios:
- Augmented assignments must only accept a single target (Name,
Attribute or Subscript), but no tuples or lists.
- `except` clauses should only accept a single `Name` as a target.
Co-authored-by: Pablo Galindo <Pablogsal@gmail.com>
This commit fixes SyntaxError locations when the caret is not displayed,
by doing the following:
- `col_number` always gets set to the location of the offending
node/expr. When no caret is to be displayed, this gets achieved
by setting the object holding the error line to None.
- Introduce a new function `_PyPegen_raise_error_known_location`,
which can be called, when an arbitrary `lineno`/`col_offset`
needs to be passed. This function then gets used in the grammar
(through some new macros and inline functions) so that SyntaxError
locations of the new parser match that of the old.
